Eraydin Şahizer, Avşar Gülçin
Şahizer Eraydin, PhD, RN, Nursing Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Gaziosmanpaşa University, Tokat, Turkey. Gülçin Avşar, PhD, RN, Faculty of Nursing, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2018 Mar/Apr;45(2):123-130. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000405.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of foot exercises on wound healing in type 2 diabetic patients with a diabetic foot ulcer.
Prospective, randomized controlled study.
Sixty-five patients from an outpatient clinic with grade 1 or 2 ulcers (Wagner classification) who met study criteria agreed to participate; 60 patients completed the study and were included in the final analysis. Subjects were followed up between February 2014 and June 2015.
Subjects were recruited by the researchers in the clinics where they received treatment. Subjects were randomly allocated to either the control or intervention group. Data were collected using investigator-developed forms: patient information form and the diabetic foot exercises log. Patients in the intervention group received standard wound care and performed daily foot exercises for 12 weeks; the control group received standard wound care but no exercises. The ulcers of the patients in both the intervention and control groups were examined and measured at the 4th, 8th, and 12th weeks. The groups were compared in terms of the ulcer size and depth. To analyze and compare the data, frequency distribution, mean (standard deviation), variance analysis, and the independent samples t test and the χ test were used.
The mean ulcer areas were 12.63 (14.43), 6.91 (5.44), 4.30 (3.70), and 3.29 (3.80) cm (P < .05) in the study intervention group, and 24.67 (20.70), 24.75 (20.84), 20.33 (20.79), and 18.52 (21.49) cm in the control group in the 4th, 8th, and 12th weeks, respectively. Significant differences were found between diabetic foot ulcer sizes in the study intervention group in the 4th and 12th weeks compared to beginning baseline (P ≤ .05). However, only the 12th week was different from the beginning in the control group (P = .000). The mean depths of the ulcers were 0.56 (0.85), 0.42 (0.68), 0.36 (0.50), and 0.28 (0.38) cm in the study intervention group (P < .05) and 0.61 (0.84), 0.82 (1.07), 0.83 (1.21), and 0.80 (1.26) cm in the control group, respectively, at the baseline, and at the 4th, 8th, and 12th weeks, respectively (P = .000).
The ulcer areas decreased significantly in the study intervention group compared to the control group during the 3 follow-up measurements. An important finding in this study was the DFU area decreased more in those who exercised more. Findings suggests foot exercises should be included in the treatment plan when managing patients with diabetic foot ulcers.
本研究旨在探讨足部锻炼对2型糖尿病足溃疡患者伤口愈合的影响。
前瞻性随机对照研究。
来自门诊的65例符合研究标准的1级或2级溃疡(瓦格纳分级)患者同意参与研究;60例患者完成研究并纳入最终分析。研究对象在2014年2月至2015年6月期间接受随访。
研究人员在患者接受治疗的诊所招募研究对象。将研究对象随机分为对照组和干预组。使用研究人员自行设计的表格收集数据:患者信息表和糖尿病足部锻炼日志。干预组患者接受标准伤口护理,并进行为期12周的每日足部锻炼;对照组接受标准伤口护理但不进行锻炼。在第4、8和12周对干预组和对照组患者的溃疡进行检查和测量。比较两组溃疡的大小和深度。为分析和比较数据,使用了频率分布、均值(标准差)、方差分析、独立样本t检验和χ检验。
研究干预组在第4、8和12周时溃疡平均面积分别为12.63(14.43)、6.91(5.44)、4.30(3.70)和3.29(3.80)平方厘米(P <.05),对照组分别为24.67(20.70)、24.75(20.84)、20.33(20.79)和18.52(21.49)平方厘米。与基线相比,研究干预组在第4周和第12周时糖尿病足溃疡大小存在显著差异(P≤.05)。然而,对照组仅在第12周与开始时不同(P =.000)。研究干预组溃疡平均深度在基线时为0.56(0.85)厘米,第4、8和12周时分别为0.42(0.68)、0.36(0.50)和0.28(0.38)厘米(P <.05),对照组在基线时为0.61(0.84)厘米,第4、8和12周时分别为0.82(1.07)、0.83(1.21)和0.80(1.26)厘米(P =.000)。
在3次随访测量中,研究干预组的溃疡面积相比对照组显著减小。本研究的一个重要发现是锻炼较多的患者糖尿病足溃疡面积减小得更多。研究结果表明,在治疗糖尿病足溃疡患者时,应将足部锻炼纳入治疗方案。