Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Center for Science, Technology & Society, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Health Promot Int. 2019 Jun 1;34(3):624-633. doi: 10.1093/heapro/day002.
While academic open access, open data and open science initiatives have proliferated in recent years, facilitating new research resources for health promotion, open initiatives are not one-size-fits-all. Health research particularly illustrates how open initiatives may serve various interests and ends. Open initiatives not only foster new pathways of research access; they also discipline research in new ways, especially when associated with new regimes of research use and peer review, while participating in innovation ecosystems that often perpetuate existing systemic biases toward commercial biomedicine. Currently, many open initiatives are more oriented toward biomedical research paradigms than paradigms associated with public health promotion, such as social determinants of health research. Moreover, open initiatives too often dovetail with, rather than challenge, neoliberal policy paradigms. Such initiatives are unlikely to transform existing health research landscapes and redress health inequities. In this context, attunement to social determinants of health research and community-based local knowledge is vital to orient open initiatives toward public health promotion and health equity. Such an approach calls for discourses, norms and innovation ecosystems that contest neoliberal policy frameworks and foster upstream interventions to promote health, beyond biomedical paradigms. This analysis highlights challenges and possibilities for leveraging open initiatives on behalf of a wider range of health research stakeholders, while emphasizing public health promotion, health equity and social justice as benchmarks of transformation.
虽然近年来学术开放获取、开放数据和开放科学倡议如雨后春笋般涌现,为促进健康的研究提供了新资源,但开放倡议并非一刀切。健康研究特别说明了开放倡议如何为各种利益和目标服务。开放倡议不仅为研究提供了新的获取途径,而且以新的研究使用和同行评审方式规范了研究,同时参与了创新生态系统,这些系统往往使现有的商业生物医学系统偏见永久化。目前,许多开放倡议更倾向于生物医学研究范式,而不是与公共健康促进相关的范式,如健康研究的社会决定因素。此外,开放倡议往往与新自由主义政策范式相吻合,而不是挑战它们。这样的倡议不太可能改变现有的健康研究格局,也不能解决健康不平等问题。在这种情况下,关注健康研究的社会决定因素和基于社区的本地知识对于将开放倡议定位为促进公共健康和健康公平至关重要。这种方法需要用话语、规范和创新生态系统来挑战新自由主义政策框架,并促进超越生物医学范式的上游干预措施,以促进健康。这种分析强调了代表更广泛的健康研究利益相关者利用开放倡议的挑战和可能性,同时强调促进健康、健康公平和社会正义作为变革的基准。