Suppr超能文献

验证预处理体重指数作为抗抑郁治疗结果的调节剂:CO-MED 试验的结果。

Validating pre-treatment body mass index as moderator of antidepressant treatment outcomes: Findings from CO-MED trial.

机构信息

Center for Depression Research and Clinical Care, UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75390-9119, United States.

Department of Clinical Sciences, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2018 Jul;234:34-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.02.089. Epub 2018 Feb 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Currently, there are no valid clinical or biological markers to personalize the treatment of depression. Recent evidence suggests that body mass index (BMI) may guide the selection of antidepressant medications with different mechanisms of action.

METHODS

Combining Medications to Enhance Depression Outcomes (CO-MED) trial participants with BMI measurement (n = 662) were categorized as normal- or underweight (<25), overweight (25-<30), obese I (30-<35), and obese II+ (≥35). Logistic regression analysis with remission as the dependent variable and treatment arm-by-BMI category interaction as the primary independent variable was used to evaluate if BMI differentially predicted response to escitalopram (SSRI) monotherapy, bupropion-escitalopram combination, or venlafaxine-mirtazapine combination, after controlling for gender and baseline depression severity.

RESULTS

Remission rates among the three treatment arms differed on the basis of pre-treatment BMI (chi-square=12.80, degrees of freedom=6, p = .046). Normal- or under-weight participants were less likely to remit with the bupropion-SSRI combination (26.8%) than SSRI monotherapy (37.3%, number needed to treat or NNT = 9.5) or venlafaxine-mirtazapine combination (44.4%, NNT = 5.7). Conversely, obese II+ participants were more likely to remit with bupropion-SSRI (47.4%) than SSRI monotherapy (28.6%, NNT = 5.3) or venlafaxine-mirtazapine combination (37.7%, NNT = 10.3). Remission rates did not differ among overweight and obese I participants.

LIMITATIONS

Secondary analysis, higher rates of obesity than the general population.

CONCLUSIONS

Antidepressant selection in clinical practice can be personalized with BMI measurements. Bupropion-SSRI combination should be avoided in normal- or under-weight depressed outpatients as compared to SSRI monotherapy and venlafaxine-mirtazapine combination and preferred in those with BMI≥35.

摘要

背景

目前,尚无有效的临床或生物学标志物来针对个体的抑郁症进行治疗。最近的证据表明,体重指数(BMI)可能指导选择具有不同作用机制的抗抑郁药。

方法

将合并用药以改善抑郁结局(CO-MED)试验中接受 BMI 测量的参与者(n=662)分为正常或低体重(<25)、超重(25-<30)、肥胖 I(30-<35)和肥胖 II+(≥35)。使用逻辑回归分析,以缓解为因变量,治疗臂-体重指数类别交互作用为主要自变量,评估 BMI 是否能预测艾司西酞普兰(SSRIs)单药治疗、安非他酮-艾司西酞普兰联合治疗或文拉法辛-米氮平联合治疗的反应,同时控制性别和基线抑郁严重程度。

结果

根据治疗前 BMI,三种治疗组的缓解率存在差异(卡方=12.80,自由度=6,p=0.046)。与 SSRIs 单药治疗(37.3%,NNT=9.5)或文拉法辛-米氮平联合治疗(44.4%,NNT=5.7)相比,低体重或正常体重的参与者用安非他酮-SSRIs 联合治疗缓解的可能性较低(26.8%,NNT=9.5)。相反,肥胖 II+参与者用安非他酮-SSRIs 联合治疗缓解的可能性更高(47.4%),与 SSRIs 单药治疗(28.6%,NNT=5.3)或文拉法辛-米氮平联合治疗(37.7%,NNT=10.3)相比。超重和肥胖 I 参与者的缓解率没有差异。

局限性

二次分析,肥胖率高于一般人群。

结论

在临床实践中,通过 BMI 测量可以个性化选择抗抑郁药。与 SSRIs 单药治疗和文拉法辛-米氮平联合治疗相比,安非他酮-SSRIs 联合治疗应避免用于低体重或正常体重的抑郁门诊患者,而应优先用于 BMI≥35 的患者。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

3
Immuno-metabolic depression: from concept to implementation.免疫代谢抑制:从概念到实践
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024 Dec 18;48:101166. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101166. eCollection 2025 Jan.
8
Adipose-derived stem cells and obesity: The spear and shield relationship.脂肪来源干细胞与肥胖:矛与盾的关系。
Genes Dis. 2021 Oct 2;10(1):175-186. doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2021.09.004. eCollection 2023 Jan.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验