• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Trade Agreements and Direct-to-Consumer Advertising of Pharmaceuticals.贸易协定与药品直接面向消费者的广告
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Feb 1;7(2):98-100. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.124.
2
USMCA (NAFTA 2.0): tightening the constraints on the right to regulate for public health.美墨加协定(北美自由贸易协定 2.0):收紧对监管公共健康的权利的限制。
Global Health. 2019 May 14;15(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0476-8.
3
Analyzing the impact of trade and investment agreements on pharmaceutical policy: provisions, pathways and potential impacts.分析贸易和投资协定对药品政策的影响:规定、途径和潜在影响。
Global Health. 2019 Nov 28;15(Suppl 1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0518-2.
4
The rise of digital direct-to-consumer advertising?: Comparison of direct-to-consumer advertising expenditure trends from publicly available data sources and global policy implications.数字直接面向消费者广告的兴起?:基于公开数据源的直接面向消费者广告支出趋势比较及全球政策影响
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jun 19;15:236. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0885-1.
5
A new generation of trade policy: potential risks to diet-related health from the trans pacific partnership agreement.新一代贸易政策:跨太平洋伙伴关系协定对饮食相关健康的潜在风险。
Global Health. 2013 Oct 16;9:46. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-9-46.
6
Critical Test of the Beneficial Consequences of Lifting the Ban on Direct-to-Consumer Advertising for Prescription Drugs in Italy: Experimental Exposure and Questionnaire Study.意大利解除处方药直接面向消费者广告禁令的有益影响的关键性检验:实验暴露和问卷调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 17;25:e40616. doi: 10.2196/40616.
7
The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Is It Everything We Feared for Health?《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定:它对健康的影响是否如我们所担心的那样?》
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016 Aug 1;5(8):487-496. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.41.
8
Association of Direct-to-Consumer Advertising of Prescription Drugs With Consumer Health-Related Intentions and Beliefs Among Individuals at Risk of Cardiovascular Disease.直接面向消费者的处方药广告与心血管疾病风险人群的消费者健康相关意图和信念的关联。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Aug 5;3(8):e222570. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.2570.
9
The legal and ethical dimensions of direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs: the case of Pfizer and Lipitor in the United States.直接面向消费者的处方药广告的法律和伦理维度:以美国辉瑞公司的立普妥为例。
Health Mark Q. 2021 Jan-Mar;38(1):23-34. doi: 10.1080/07359683.2021.1947079. Epub 2021 Jul 3.
10
The Tip of the Iceberg of Misleading Online Advertising Comment on "Trouble Spots in Online Direct-to-Consumer Prescription Drug Promotion: A Content Analysis of FDA Warning Letters".冰山一角的误导性在线广告评论——“在线直接面向消费者的处方药促销中的问题点:FDA 警告信的内容分析”
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016 Feb 18;5(5):329-31. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.19.

引用本文的文献

1
Health education "empowerment" digital marketing of consumer products and services: Promoting therapeutic benefits of self-care for depression and chronic pain.健康教育“赋权”消费品和服务的数字营销:宣传自我保健对抑郁症和慢性疼痛的治疗益处。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 10;10:949518. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.949518. eCollection 2022.
2
Projected spending for brand-name drugs in English primary care given US prices: a cross-sectional study.按美国价格计算的英国初级保健中品牌药物的预计支出:一项横断面研究。
J R Soc Med. 2020 Sep;113(9):350-359. doi: 10.1177/0141076820918238.
3
Analyzing the impact of trade and investment agreements on pharmaceutical policy: provisions, pathways and potential impacts.分析贸易和投资协定对药品政策的影响:规定、途径和潜在影响。
Global Health. 2019 Nov 28;15(Suppl 1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0518-2.
4
Trends in use of prescription stimulants in the United States and Territories, 2006 to 2016.2006 年至 2016 年美国属地处方兴奋剂使用趋势。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 28;13(11):e0206100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206100. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Direct-to-Consumer Medical Testing in the Era of Value-Based Care.基于价值医疗时代的直接面向消费者的医学检测
JAMA. 2017 Jun 27;317(24):2485-2486. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.5929.
2
Pharmaceutical Marketing for Rare Diseases: Regulating Drug Company Promotion in an Era of Unprecedented Advertisement.罕见病的药物营销:在广告前所未有的时代规范制药公司的推广行为
JAMA. 2017 Jun 27;317(24):2479-2480. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.5784.
3
Digital Direct-to-Consumer Advertising: A Perfect Storm of Rapid Evolution and Stagnant Regulation Comment on "Trouble Spots in Online Direct-to-Consumer Prescription Drug Promotion: A Content Analysis of FDA Warning Letters".数字直接面向消费者广告:快速演变与监管停滞的完美风暴 述评:“在线直接面向消费者的处方药促销中的问题点:美国 FDA 警示信的内容分析”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016 Feb 3;5(4):271-4. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.11.
4
Trouble Spots in Online Direct-to-Consumer Prescription Drug Promotion: A Content Analysis of FDA Warning Letters.在线直接面向消费者的处方药促销中的问题点:FDA 警告信的内容分析。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015 Aug 25;4(12):813-21. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2015.157.
5
US physician group calls for ban on direct to consumer drug advertising.
BMJ. 2015 Nov 18;351:h6230. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h6230.
6
Call for transparency in new generation trade deals.呼吁新一代贸易协定保持透明度。
Lancet. 2015 Feb 14;385(9968):604-605. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60233-1.
7
Delays in the post-marketing withdrawal of drugs to which deaths have been attributed: a systematic investigation and analysis.已导致死亡的药品在上市后撤市的延迟情况:一项系统调查与分析
BMC Med. 2015 Feb 5;13:26. doi: 10.1186/s12916-014-0262-7.
8
The Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement: exacerbation of inequality for patients with serious mental illness.《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定》:加重严重精神疾病患者的不平等状况。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2014 Dec;48(12):1077-80. doi: 10.1177/0004867414557679. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
9
Direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medication in New Zealand.新西兰处方药的直接面向消费者的广告。
N Z Med J. 2014 Aug 29;127(1401):102-10.
10
Content analysis of false and misleading claims in television advertising for prescription and nonprescription drugs.处方药和非处方药电视广告中虚假及误导性声明的内容分析
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Jan;29(1):110-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2604-0.

贸易协定与药品直接面向消费者的广告

Trade Agreements and Direct-to-Consumer Advertising of Pharmaceuticals.

机构信息

School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.

Waikato Clinical Campus, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Feb 1;7(2):98-100. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.124.

DOI:10.15171/ijhpm.2017.124
PMID:29524933
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5819384/
Abstract

There is growing international concern about the risks posed by direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) of prescription pharmaceuticals, including via the internet. Recent trade agreements negotiated by the United States, however, incorporate provisions that may constrain national regulation of DTCA. Some provisions explicitly mention DTCA; others enable foreign investors to seek compensation if new regulations are seen to harm their investments. These provisions may thus prevent countries from restricting DTCA or put them at risk of expensive legal action from companies seeking damages due to restrictions on advertising. While the most recent example, the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP), collapsed following US withdrawal in January 2017, early indications of the Trump Administration's trade policy agenda signal an even more aggressive approach on the part of the United States in negotiating advantages for American businesses. Furthermore, the eleven remaining TPP countries may decide to proceed with the agreement in the absence of the United States, with most of the original text (including the provisions relevant to DTCA) intact.

摘要

国际社会越来越关注直接面向消费者的处方药广告(DTCA)所带来的风险,包括通过互联网进行的广告。然而,美国最近谈判达成的贸易协议纳入了可能限制国家对 DTCA 监管的条款。一些条款明确提到了 DTCA;其他条款则使外国投资者在新法规被视为损害其投资时能够寻求赔偿。因此,这些条款可能会阻止各国限制 DTCA,或者使它们面临因限制广告而遭受公司寻求损害赔偿的昂贵法律诉讼的风险。虽然最近的一个例子《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定》(TPP)在美国于 2017 年 1 月退出后崩溃,但特朗普政府贸易政策议程的早期迹象表明,美国在为美国企业争取优势方面采取了更为激进的谈判方式。此外,在没有美国参与的情况下,其余 11 个 TPP 国家可能决定继续推进该协议,其中包括与 DTCA 相关的大部分原始文本。