Rozen Guy, Vaid Jeena, Hosseini Seyed Mohammadreza, Kaadan M Ihsan, Rafael Allon, Roka Attila, Poh Yukkee C, Poh Ming-Zher, Heist Edwin Kevin, Ruskin Jeremy Neil
Cardiovascular Institute, Padeh Medical Center, Poria, Israel; Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Am J Cardiol. 2018 May 15;121(10):1187-1191. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.01.035. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia in adults, associated with significant morbidity, increased mortality, and rising health-care costs. Simple and available tools for the accurate detection of arrhythmia recurrence in patients after electrical cardioversion (CV) or ablation procedures for AF can help to guide therapeutic decisions. We conducted a prospective, single-center study to evaluate the accuracy of Cardiio Rhythm Mobile Application (CRMA) for AF detection. Patients >18 years of age who were scheduled for elective CV for AF were enrolled in the study. CRMA finger pulse recordings, utilizing an iPhone camera, were obtained before (pre-CV) and after (post-CV) the CV. The findings were validated against surface electrocardiograms. Ninety-eight patients (75.5% men), mean age of 67.7 ± 10.5 years, were enrolled. No electrocardiogram for validation was available in 1 case. Pre-CV CRMA readings were analyzed in 97 of the 98 patients. Post-CV CRMA readings were analyzed for 92 of 93 patients who underwent CV. One patient left before the recording was obtained. The Cardiio Rhythm Mobile Application correctly identified 94 of 101 AF recordings (93.1%) as AF and 80 of 88 non-AF recordings (90.1%) as non-AF. The sensitivity was 93.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 86.9% to 97.2%) and the specificity was 90.9% (95% CI = 82.9% to 96.0%). The positive predictive value was 92.2% (95% CI = 85.8% to 95.8%) and the negative predictive value was 92.0% (95% CI = 94.8% to 95.9%). In conclusion, the CRMA demonstrates promising potential in accurate detection and discrimination of AF from normal sinus rhythm in patients with a history of AF.
心房颤动(AF)是成人中最常见的持续性心律失常,与显著的发病率、死亡率增加以及医疗保健成本上升相关。用于准确检测房颤患者在电复律(CV)或消融术后心律失常复发的简单且可用的工具有助于指导治疗决策。我们进行了一项前瞻性单中心研究,以评估Cardiio心律移动应用程序(CRMA)检测房颤的准确性。计划接受择期房颤电复律的18岁以上患者被纳入研究。在电复律前(CV前)和电复律后(CV后)使用iPhone摄像头获取CRMA手指脉搏记录。研究结果与体表心电图进行验证。共纳入98例患者(75.5%为男性),平均年龄67.7±10.5岁。1例患者没有用于验证的心电图。98例患者中的97例分析了CV前的CRMA读数。93例接受电复律的患者中的92例分析了CV后的CRMA读数。1例患者在获得记录前离开。Cardiio心律移动应用程序正确地将101份房颤记录中的94份(93.1%)识别为房颤,将88份非房颤记录中的80份(90.1%)识别为非房颤。敏感性为93.1%(95%置信区间[CI]=86.9%至97.2%),特异性为90.9%(95%CI=82.9%至96.0%)。阳性预测值为92.2%(95%CI=85.8%至95.8%),阴性预测值为92.0%(95%CI=94.8%至95.9%)。总之,CRMA在准确检测房颤患者并将房颤与正常窦性心律区分开来方面显示出有前景的潜力。