Suppr超能文献

外侧半月板与内侧半月板撕裂患者的姿势稳定性比较

Comparative postural stability in patients with lateral meniscus versus medial meniscus tears.

作者信息

Lee Jin-Hyuck, Heo Jae-Won, Lee Dae-Hee

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Anam Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Knee. 2018 Mar;25(2):256-261. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2018.01.012. Epub 2018 Mar 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Types of mechanoreceptors may differ between the medial and lateral menisci, suggesting that postural stability may differ between patients with medial and lateral meniscus tears. However, to date, postural stability has not been compared in patients with medial and lateral meniscus tears. This study used stabilometry to compare postural stability in patients with medial and lateral meniscus tears.

METHODS

Postural stability and thigh muscle strength were assessed in 24 patients with medial and 18 patients with lateral meniscus tears. Postural stability was determined by measuring the anteroposterior (APSI), mediolateral (MLSI), and overall (OSI) stability indices using stabilometry. Maximal torque (60°/s) of the quadriceps and hamstring was evaluated using an isokinetic testing device.

RESULTS

The three stability indices, OSI, APSI, and MLSI, in both involved and uninvolved knees were all significantly greater in patients with lateral than with medial meniscus tears. (P<0.001 for all OSI, APSI, and MLSI in both involved and uninvolved knees, except for P=0.005 for MLSI of involved knees). In patients with medial meniscus tears, both OSI (1.4±0.4 vs. 1.1±0.4, P=0.037) and MLSI (0.9±0.3 vs. 0.8±0.3, P=0.041) were significantly higher on the injured than the uninjured side. In patients with lateral meniscus tears, none of the stability indices differed significantly between injured and uninjured knee joints.

CONCLUSION

Postural stability of both the injured and uninjured knee joints was poorer in patients with lateral than with medial meniscus tears.

摘要

背景

内侧半月板和外侧半月板的机械感受器类型可能不同,这表明内侧半月板撕裂患者和外侧半月板撕裂患者的姿势稳定性可能存在差异。然而,迄今为止,尚未对内侧半月板撕裂患者和外侧半月板撕裂患者的姿势稳定性进行比较。本研究采用稳定测量法比较内侧半月板撕裂患者和外侧半月板撕裂患者的姿势稳定性。

方法

对24例内侧半月板撕裂患者和18例外侧半月板撕裂患者进行姿势稳定性和大腿肌肉力量评估。姿势稳定性通过使用稳定测量法测量前后(APSI)、内外侧(MLSI)和整体(OSI)稳定性指数来确定。使用等速测试设备评估股四头肌和腘绳肌的最大扭矩(60°/秒)。

结果

外侧半月板撕裂患者患侧和未患侧的三个稳定性指数,即OSI、APSI和MLSI,均显著高于内侧半月板撕裂患者。(患侧和未患侧的所有OSI、APSI和MLSI,P<0.001,患侧MLSI除外,P = 0.005)。在内侧半月板撕裂患者中,患侧的OSI(1.4±0.4 vs. 1.1±0.4,P = 0.037)和MLSI(0.9±0.3 vs. 0.8±0.3,P = 0.041)均显著高于未患侧(健侧)。在外侧半月板撕裂患者中,患侧和未患侧膝关节的稳定性指数均无显著差异。

结论

外侧半月板撕裂患者患侧和未患侧膝关节的姿势稳定性均比内侧半月板撕裂患者差。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验