Florida State University.
Duke University.
Behav Ther. 2018 Mar;49(2):198-211. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
Interpretation Bias Modification (IBM) is gaining attention in the literature as an intervention that alters cognitive biases and reduces associated symptoms. Forty, primarily college-aged, non-treatment-seeking adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) were randomly assigned to receive either IBM targeting hostile interpretation bias (IBM-H) or a healthy video control (HVC) condition. Compared to those in HVC, participants in IBM-H reported more benign interpretations and fewer hostile interpretations at posttreatment. No difference in depressive interpretation bias was found between groups at posttreatment. IBM-H led to improved anger control at posttreatment and follow-up compared to HVC, though no effects of condition were found on trait anger or depressive symptoms. The IBM-H group perceived their treatment as less credible than the HVC group. For individuals with high expectancy of treatment success, IBM-H led to lower posttreatment depressive symptoms compared to HVC, while findings trended in the opposite direction for those with low expectancy of success. Overall, these preliminary findings point to boundary conditions for the efficacy of IBM protocols for anger and depression and potential improvements to be made to future IBM protocols.
解释偏向修正(IBM)作为一种能够改变认知偏向、减轻相关症状的干预措施,在文献中受到了关注。本研究招募了 40 名非治疗寻求者、主要为大学生的重性抑郁障碍(MDD)患者,随机分为接受针对敌意解释偏向修正(IBM-H)或健康视频控制(HVC)的条件。与 HVC 组相比,IBM-H 组在治疗后报告了更温和的解释和更少的敌意解释。治疗后,两组之间的抑郁解释偏向无差异。与 HVC 相比,IBM-H 在治疗后和随访时改善了愤怒控制,但条件对特质愤怒或抑郁症状没有影响。IBM-H 组认为他们的治疗比 HVC 组可信度低。对于高治疗预期成功的个体,IBM-H 导致治疗后抑郁症状低于 HVC,而对于低预期成功的个体,结果则呈相反趋势。总的来说,这些初步发现指出了 IBM 协议对愤怒和抑郁的疗效的边界条件,以及对未来 IBM 协议进行改进的可能性。