• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

系统回顾单词句子联想范式(WSAP)。

A systematic review of the word sentence association paradigm (WSAP).

机构信息

Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University, United States; Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, United States.

VA Boston Healthcare System, United States.

出版信息

J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2019 Sep;64:133-148. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 Apr 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.jbtep.2019.04.003
PMID:31002979
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10127572/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The Word Sentence Association Paradigm (WSAP) was originally designed to assess and modify interpretive biases (IB) in socially anxious individuals. Researchers have since modified the WSAP for use across various populations. Despite its widespread use, no studies have systematically reviewed the WSAP to determine its validity and reliability.

METHODS

We review variations to the WSAP, populations in which the WSAP has been used, reliability data, and effect sizes across 41 studies published between 2008 and March 2018.

RESULTS

Results indicate that the WSAP has been utilized to target 18 disorders and symptoms in adults and children. Modifications include stimulus content, timing parameters, and presentation order of word and sentence pairs. Reported internal consistency and test-retest reliability suggest good to excellent reliability. Medium to large effect sizes were reported when comparing control samples to those with psychopathology and in pre-post comparisons of the modification version of the WSAP.

LIMITATIONS

Studies varied regarding which indices of the WSAP were presented and specific task parameters used, making it challenging to compare effects.

CONCLUSIONS

The WSAP is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing and modifying interpretive biases with unique characteristics compared with other IB assessment and modification tasks.

摘要

背景和目的

单词句子联想范式(WSAP)最初是为了评估和修正社交焦虑个体的解释偏差(IB)而设计的。此后,研究人员对 WSAP 进行了修改,以便在各种人群中使用。尽管 WSAP 被广泛使用,但尚无研究系统地评估 WSAP 的有效性和可靠性。

方法

我们回顾了 WSAP 的变化、使用 WSAP 的人群、可靠性数据以及 2008 年至 2018 年 3 月期间发表的 41 项研究的效应量。

结果

结果表明,WSAP 已被用于评估成人和儿童的 18 种障碍和症状。修改包括刺激内容、时间参数以及单词和句子对的呈现顺序。报告的内部一致性和重测信度表明信度良好到优秀。与对照组相比,与精神病理学组相比,以及在 WSAP 修正版的前后比较中,报告的效应量均为中等至较大。

局限性

研究在呈现 WSAP 的哪些指标以及使用特定的任务参数方面存在差异,这使得比较效果变得具有挑战性。

结论

与其他解释偏差评估和修正任务相比,WSAP 是一种可靠且有效的评估和修正解释偏差的工具,具有独特的特征。

相似文献

1
A systematic review of the word sentence association paradigm (WSAP).系统回顾单词句子联想范式(WSAP)。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2019 Sep;64:133-148. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
2
Measuring Hostile Interpretation Bias: The WSAP-Hostility Scale.测量敌意解释偏差:WSAP-敌意量表。
Assessment. 2016 Dec;23(6):707-719. doi: 10.1177/1073191115599052. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
3
Validation of an interpretation bias assessment for body dissatisfaction.身体不满解释偏差评估的验证
Body Image. 2014 Sep;11(4):557-61. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.08.010. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
4
Interpretation in Social Anxiety: When Meaning Precedes Ambiguity.社交焦虑中的解读:意义先于模糊之时。
Cognit Ther Res. 2009;33(4):406-415. doi: 10.1007/s10608-009-9235-0.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Effects of induced appearance-related interpretation bias: A test of the cognitive-behavioral model of body dysmorphic disorder.诱发表象相关解释偏差的影响:躯体变形障碍认知行为模型的一项测试。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2018 Dec;61:180-187. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 29.
7
[Diagnostic structured interviews in child and adolescent's psychiatry].[儿童和青少年精神病学中的诊断性结构化访谈]
Encephale. 2004 Mar-Apr;30(2):122-34. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95422-x.
8
Psychometric Properties of the Persian Word Pairs Task to Evaluate Declarative Memory.用于评估陈述性记忆的波斯语单词对任务的心理测量特性。
Basic Clin Neurosci. 2022 Jul-Aug;13(4):511-518. doi: 10.32598/bcn.2021.2585.1. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
9
Symptom validity indicators embedded in the Controlled Oral Word Association Test.内置于词语流畅性测试中的症状真实性指标。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2012;26(7):1230-41. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2012.709886. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
10
Profiling Speech Sound Disorders for Clinical Validation of the Computer Articulation Instrument.剖析言语声音障碍以对计算机发音仪器进行临床验证。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Jul 15;28(2S):844-856. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-MSC18-18-0112.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the reliability of the Word-Sentence Association Paradigm (WSAP) as an interpretation bias assessment across ethnoracial groups.评估单词-句子联想范式(WSAP)作为跨种族群体解释偏差评估方法的可靠性。
Cognit Ther Res. 2025 Apr;49(2):425-432. doi: 10.1007/s10608-024-10523-8. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
2
Acceptability and Engagement of a Smartphone-Delivered Interpretation Bias Intervention in a Sample of Black and Latinx Adults: Open Trial.智能手机传递的解读偏差干预在黑人和拉丁裔成年人样本中的可接受性和参与度:开放试验。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Jul 31;11:e56758. doi: 10.2196/56758.
3
Cognitive bias modification for perfectionism and intolerance of uncertainty: A randomized controlled trial.认知偏差修正对完美主义和不确定性容忍度的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Psych J. 2024 Aug;13(4):679-691. doi: 10.1002/pchj.742. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
4
Autonomic reactivity during acute social stress: exploratory investigation of an interaction by threat interpretation bias and emotion regulation difficulties.自主神经反应在急性社会应激中的作用:通过威胁解释偏差和情绪调节困难来探索交互作用。
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2024 Mar;37(2):251-264. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2023.2235283. Epub 2023 Jul 15.
5
Negative interpretation bias connects to real-world daily affect: A multistudy approach.负性解释偏差与现实世界的日常情绪有关:一项多研究方法。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Jun;152(6):1690-1704. doi: 10.1037/xge0001351. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
6
A Pilot Feasibility Open Trial of an Interpretation Bias Intervention for Parents of Anxious Children.针对焦虑儿童家长的解释偏差干预的初步可行性开放试验。
Cogn Behav Pract. 2022 Nov;29(4):860-873. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpra.2021.09.005. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
7
How Social Experiences Affect Interpretation Bias Among Individuals With Non-clinical Depression: The Role of Ostracism.社会经历如何影响非临床抑郁症个体的解释偏差:被排斥的作用。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Feb 7;13:819143. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.819143. eCollection 2022.
8
Interpretation Bias in Breast Cancer Survivors Experiencing Fear of Cancer Recurrence.经历癌症复发恐惧的乳腺癌幸存者的解释偏差
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 18;12:682174. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.682174. eCollection 2021.
9
Effects of cognitive bias modification for interpretation on hostile interpretation bias and self-reported aggression in juvenile delinquents.认知偏差矫正对青少年罪犯敌意解释偏差及自我报告攻击行为的影响。
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2021 May-Aug;21(2):100226. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2021.100226. Epub 2021 Feb 14.
10
Development of a cognitive bias modification intervention for anxiety disorders in primary care.开发一种针对初级保健中焦虑障碍的认知偏差修正干预措施。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2022 Jan;61 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):73-92. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12281. Epub 2021 Feb 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Translating CBM-I Into Real-World Settings: Augmenting a CBT-Based Psychiatric Hospital Program.将 CBM-I 转化为现实环境:增强基于认知行为疗法的精神病院项目。
Behav Ther. 2019 May;50(3):515-530. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
2
Modification of Hostile Interpretation Bias in Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial.抑郁患者敌意解释偏差的修正:一项随机对照试验
Behav Ther. 2018 Mar;49(2):198-211. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
3
Experimental modification of dysfunctional interpretations in individuals with contamination concerns.对有污染担忧个体功能失调性认知的实验性修正。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;59:56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2017.11.005. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
4
Moving towards the benign: Automatic interpretation bias modification in dysphoria.走向良性:抑郁中自动解释偏向的修正。
Behav Res Ther. 2017 Dec;99:98-107. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
5
Ethnicity's Role in the Relationship Between Anxiety and Negative Interpretation Bias Among Clinically Anxious Youth: A Pilot Study.种族在临床焦虑青少年焦虑与消极解释偏差关系中的作用:一项初步研究。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2018 Jun;49(3):396-408. doi: 10.1007/s10578-017-0760-x.
6
Hostile interpretation training for individuals with alcohol use disorder and elevated trait anger: A controlled trial of a web-based intervention.酒精使用障碍和特质愤怒升高个体的敌意解释训练:一项基于网络的干预的对照试验。
Behav Res Ther. 2017 Dec;99:57-66. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2017.09.004. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
7
Effects of Cognitive Bias Modification Training via Smartphones.通过智能手机进行认知偏差矫正训练的效果
Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 14;8:1370. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01370. eCollection 2017.
8
The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences.可靠性悖论:为何稳健的认知任务不能产生可靠的个体差异。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Jun;50(3):1166-1186. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0935-1.
9
Randomized control trial investigating the efficacy of a computer-based intolerance of uncertainty intervention.一项基于计算机的不确定容忍度干预措施疗效的随机对照试验研究。
Behav Res Ther. 2017 Aug;95:50-57. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2017.05.007. Epub 2017 May 11.
10
Pain and multiple facets of anger and hostility in a sample seeking treatment for problematic anger.寻求治疗问题性愤怒的样本中的疼痛和愤怒与敌意的多个方面。
Psychiatry Res. 2017 Jul;253:311-317. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.04.006. Epub 2017 Apr 5.