Cognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Germany.
Cognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Germany.
Neuroimage. 2018 Jul 1;174:11-21. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.03.017. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
There is a strong inter-relation of cognitive and emotional processes as evidenced by emotional conflict monitoring processes. In the cognitive domain, proactive effects of conflicts have widely been studied; i.e. effects of conflicts in the n-1 trial on trial n. Yet, the neurophysiological processes and associated functional neuroanatomical structures underlying such proactive effects during emotional conflicts have not been investigated. This is done in the current study combining EEG recordings with signal decomposition methods and source localization approaches. We show that an emotional conflict in the n-1 trial differentially influences processing of positive and negative emotions in trial n, but not the processing of conflicts in trial n. The dual competition framework stresses the importance of dissociable 'perceptual' and 'response selection' or cognitive control levels for interactive effects of cognition and emotion. Only once these coding levels were isolated in the neurophysiological data, processes explaining the behavioral effects were detectable. The data show that there is not only a close correspondence between theoretical propositions of the dual competition framework and neurophysiological processes. Rather, processing levels conceptualized in the framework operate in overlapping time windows, but are implemented via distinct functional neuroanatomical structures; the precuneus (BA31) and the insula (BA13). It seems that decoding of information in the precuneus, as well as the integration of information during response selection in the insula is more difficult when confronted with angry facial emotions whenever cognitive control resources have been highly taxed by previous conflicts.
认知和情绪过程之间存在着强烈的相互关系,这一点可以从情绪冲突监测过程中得到证明。在认知领域,冲突的前摄效应已经得到了广泛的研究;即在第 n-1 次试验中冲突对第 n 次试验的影响。然而,情绪冲突中这种前摄效应的神经生理过程及其相关的功能神经解剖结构尚未得到研究。本研究结合 EEG 记录、信号分解方法和源定位方法,对这一问题进行了研究。我们发现,第 n-1 次试验中的情绪冲突会对第 n 次试验中积极和消极情绪的处理产生不同的影响,但不会对第 n 次试验中冲突的处理产生影响。双重竞争框架强调了可分离的“知觉”和“反应选择”或认知控制水平对于认知和情绪相互作用的重要性。只有当这些编码水平在神经生理数据中被分离出来后,才能检测到解释行为效应的过程。数据表明,双重竞争框架的理论假设与神经生理过程之间不仅存在密切对应关系,而且在框架中概念化的处理水平在重叠的时间窗口中运行,但通过不同的功能神经解剖结构来实现;即楔前叶(BA31)和脑岛(BA13)。当认知控制资源因先前的冲突而高度紧张时,面对愤怒的面部表情,信息在楔前叶的解码以及在脑岛的反应选择过程中的信息整合似乎更加困难。