Makris Demosthenes, Petinaki Efi, Tsolaki Vasssiliki, Manoulakas Efstratios, Mantzarlis Konstantinos, Apostolopoulou Olimpia, Sfyras Dimitrios, Zakynthinos Epaminondas
Department of Critical Care, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece.
Department of Microbiology, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece.
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2018 Feb;22(2):67-77. doi: 10.4103/ijccm.IJCCM_302_17.
Retrospective studies have reported good clinical success rates using colistin as monotherapy to treat ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), comparable to that obtained with colistin combined with other antibiotics. However, inadequate penetration into the pulmonary parenchyma for colistin has been shown in animal models.
The aim of the study was to study prospectively the outcome, measured as clinical response and survival, of intravenously administered colistin versus colistin combined with high-dose ampicillin-sulbactam in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients with multiresistant VAP.
This prospective, open-label, randomized study included consecutive patients who developed microbiologically documented VAP due to with carbapenem-resistant strains but susceptible to colistin and ampicillin-sulbactam. Seventy-four patients were screened, but finally, 39 participants were enrolled and finished the study Patients received colistin (Group A - 19 patients) or colistin and ampicillin/sulbactam (Group B - 20 patients). The clinical response of VAP was assessed on day 4 to 5 of treatment (early response). If therapy was considered unsuccessful after this period, ampicillin/sulbactam was added in Group A or changed therapy in B.
Early cure rates in Group A and B were 15.8% and 70%, respectively ( = 0.001). Multiple regression analysis revealed that combination treatment (odds ratio [OR]: 43.6, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.594-530.9) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score <8 (OR: 0.022, 95% CI: 0.001-0.43) were independently associated with favorable clinical response. APACHE II score ≤15 (OR: 0.049, 95% CI: 0.003-0.0942) and an early favorable response to treatment (OR: 244.4, 95% CI: 2.151-27850.9) were associated with survival and discharge from ICU.
Combination therapy with colistin and a high dose of ampicillin/sulbactam was associated with a more favorable clinical response to VAP due to carbapenem-resistant than colistin monotherapy.
回顾性研究报告称,使用黏菌素单药治疗呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)具有良好的临床成功率,与黏菌素联合其他抗生素的效果相当。然而,在动物模型中已显示黏菌素在肺实质中的渗透不足。
本研究的目的是前瞻性地研究静脉注射黏菌素与黏菌素联合大剂量氨苄西林 - 舒巴坦对重症监护病房(ICU)中患有多重耐药VAP的患者的治疗结果,以临床反应和生存率来衡量。
这项前瞻性、开放标签、随机研究纳入了因耐碳青霉烯菌株但对黏菌素和氨苄西林 - 舒巴坦敏感而发生微生物学确诊VAP的连续患者。筛选了74例患者,但最终有39名参与者入组并完成了研究。患者接受黏菌素治疗(A组 - 19例患者)或黏菌素和氨苄西林/舒巴坦治疗(B组 - 20例患者)。在治疗的第4至5天评估VAP的临床反应(早期反应)。如果在此期间治疗被认为不成功,则在A组中添加氨苄西林/舒巴坦或在B组中更改治疗方案。
A组和B组的早期治愈率分别为15.8%和70%(P = 0.001)。多元回归分析显示,联合治疗(优势比[OR]:43.6,95%置信区间[CI]:3.594 - 530.9)和序贯器官衰竭评估评分<8(OR:0.022,95% CI:0.001 - 0.43)与良好的临床反应独立相关。急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)评分≤15(OR:0.049,95% CI:0.003 - 0.0942)和对治疗的早期良好反应(OR:244.4,95% CI:2.151 - 27850.9)与生存和从ICU出院相关。
与黏菌素单药治疗相比,黏菌素与大剂量氨苄西林/舒巴坦联合治疗对耐碳青霉烯类VAP具有更有利的临床反应。