Batirel A, Balkan I I, Karabay O, Agalar C, Akalin S, Alici O, Alp E, Altay F A, Altin N, Arslan F, Aslan T, Bekiroglu N, Cesur S, Celik A D, Dogan M, Durdu B, Duygu F, Engin A, Engin D O, Gonen I, Guclu E, Guven T, Hatipoglu C A, Hosoglu S, Karahocagil M K, Kilic A U, Ormen B, Ozdemir D, Ozer S, Oztoprak N, Sezak N, Turhan V, Turker N, Yilmaz H
Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Education and Research Hospital, Semsi Denizer Cd. E-5 Karayolu Cevizli Mevkii, 34890, Kartal, Istanbul, Turkey,
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014 Aug;33(8):1311-22. doi: 10.1007/s10096-014-2070-6. Epub 2014 Feb 15.
The purpose of this investigation was to compare the efficacy of colistin-based therapies in extremely drug-resistant Acinetobacter spp. bloodstream infections (XDR-ABSI). A retrospective study was conducted in 27 tertiary-care centers from January 2009 to August 2012. The primary end-point was 14-day survival, and the secondary end-points were clinical and microbiological outcomes. Thirty-six and 214 patients [102 (47.7%): colistin-carbapenem (CC), 69 (32.2%): colistin-sulbactam (CS), and 43 (20.1%: tigecycline): colistin with other agent (CO)] received colistin monotherapy and colistin-based combinations, respectively. Rates of complete response/cure and 14-day survival were relatively higher, and microbiological eradication was significantly higher in the combination group. Also, the in-hospital mortality rate was significantly lower in the combination group. No significant difference was found in the clinical (p = 0.97) and microbiological (p = 0.92) outcomes and 14-day survival rates (p = 0.79) between the three combination groups. Neither the timing of initial effective treatment nor the presence of any concomitant infection was significant between the three groups (p > 0.05) and also for 14-day survival (p > 0.05). Higher Pitt bacteremia score (PBS), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), and prolonged hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay before XDR-ABSI were significant risk factors for 14-day mortality (p = 0.02, p = 0.0001, p = 0.0001, p = 0.02, and p = 0.01, respectively). In the multivariable analysis, PBS, age, and duration of ICU stay were independent risk factors for 14-day mortality (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001, and p = 0.001, respectively). Colistin-based combination therapy resulted in significantly higher microbiological eradication rates, relatively higher cure and 14-day survival rates, and lower in-hospital mortality compared to colistin monotherapy. CC, CS, and CO combinations for XDR-ABSI did not reveal significant differences with respect to 14-day survival and clinical or microbiological outcome before and after propensity score matching (PSM). PBS, age, and length of ICU stay were independent risk factors for 14-day mortality.
本研究的目的是比较以多黏菌素为基础的治疗方案在极耐药不动杆菌属血流感染(XDR-ABSI)中的疗效。2009年1月至2012年8月在27个三级医疗中心进行了一项回顾性研究。主要终点为14天生存率,次要终点为临床和微生物学结果。36例和214例患者[102例(47.7%):多黏菌素-碳青霉烯类(CC),69例(32.2%):多黏菌素-舒巴坦(CS),43例(20.1%):替加环素-多黏菌素联合其他药物(CO)]分别接受了多黏菌素单药治疗和以多黏菌素为基础的联合治疗。联合治疗组的完全缓解/治愈率和14天生存率相对较高,微生物清除率显著更高。此外,联合治疗组的院内死亡率显著更低。三个联合治疗组在临床(p = 0.97)、微生物学(p = 0.92)结果及14天生存率(p = 0.79)方面未发现显著差异。三组之间初始有效治疗的时机以及是否存在任何合并感染均无显著差异(p > 0.05),14天生存率方面也无显著差异(p > 0.05)。较高的皮特菌血症评分(PBS)、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)评分、查尔森合并症指数(CCI)以及XDR-ABSI发生前较长的住院和重症监护病房(ICU)停留时间是14天死亡率的显著危险因素(分别为p = 0.02、p = 0.0001、p = 0.0001、p = 0.02和p = 0.01)。在多变量分析中,PBS、年龄和ICU停留时间是14天死亡率的独立危险因素(分别为p < 0.0001、p < 0.0001和p = 0.001)。与多黏菌素单药治疗相比,以多黏菌素为基础的联合治疗导致显著更高的微生物清除率、相对更高的治愈率和14天生存率以及更低的院内死亡率。对于XDR-ABSI,CC、CS和CO联合治疗在倾向评分匹配(PSM)前后的14天生存率以及临床或微生物学结果方面未显示出显著差异。PBS、年龄和ICU停留时间是14天死亡率的独立危险因素。