Tobis Sławomir, Jaracz Krystyna, Talarska Dorota, Kropińska Sylwia, Zasadzka Ewa, Pawlaczyk Mariola, Wieczorowska-Tobis Katarzyna, Philp Ian, Suwalska Aleksandra
1Department of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
2Department of Neurological and Psychiatric Nursing, University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Eur J Ageing. 2017 Apr 3;15(1):101-108. doi: 10.1007/s10433-017-0422-7. eCollection 2018 Mar.
EASYCare Standard 2010 is a brief instrument identifying concerns in health, functional independence, and well-being, from older persons' perspective. It has not previously been validated for self-assessment. Our aim was to determine whether self-assessment (EC1) can give comparable results to an evaluation performed by professionals (EC2), for older people living at home. The study included community-dwelling individuals (aged at least 60 years, = 100; 67 females) without dementia (abbreviated mental test score [AMTS] above 6). It comprised two assessments (self and professional), including summarising indexes: performed within a period between 1 and 2 weeks. Additionally, during EC1, reference tests of physical and mental function (Barthel Index: 96.3 ± 6.5, Lawton scale: 6.7 ± 2.0, geriatric depression scale: 3.0 ± 2.7, AMTS: 10.2 ± 1.0) were applied to test for concurrent validity. Cohen's kappa values (self-assessment vs. professional assessment) across all EASYCare domains were high (0.89-0.95). Results of all summarising indexes derived from self-assessment correlated strongly with reference tests. No differences were found in IS and RBC between EC1 and EC2 (8.6 ± 12.0 vs. 9.0 ± 12.7 and 1.0 ± 1.1 vs. 1.2 ± 1.4). Results of RF were higher in EC2 (1.0 ± 1.1 vs. 1.1 ± 1.4; = 0.005), due to a different response to the item "Do you feel safe outside your home?" We conclude that self-assessment with EASYCare Standard in older people without severe functional impairment living at home can deliver valid results, similar to those obtained through professional assessment, thus providing an efficient system for assessment of relatively independent individuals.
《2010年简易护理标准》是一种简短的工具,用于从老年人的角度识别健康、功能独立性和幸福感方面的问题。此前尚未对其进行自我评估的验证。我们的目的是确定对于居家老年人,自我评估(EC1)是否能得出与专业人员评估(EC2)相当的结果。该研究纳入了无痴呆(简易精神状态检查表[AMTS]得分高于6)的社区居住个体(年龄至少60岁,n = 100;67名女性)。研究包括两次评估(自我评估和专业评估),包括汇总指标,在1至2周的时间段内进行。此外,在EC1期间,应用了身体和心理功能的参考测试(Barthel指数:96.3±6.5,Lawton量表:6.7±2.0,老年抑郁量表:3.0±2.7,AMTS:10.2±1.0)来测试同时效度。所有简易护理领域的Cohen's kappa值(自我评估与专业评估)都很高(0.89 - 0.95)。自我评估得出的所有汇总指标结果与参考测试高度相关。EC1和EC2之间在IS和RBC方面未发现差异(8.6±12.0对9.0±12.7以及1.0±1.1对1.2±1.4)。由于对“你在家外感觉安全吗?”这一问题的不同回答,EC2中的RF结果更高(1.0±1.1对1.1±1.4;P = 0.005)。我们得出结论,对于居家且无严重功能障碍的老年人,使用《简易护理标准》进行自我评估能够得出有效的结果,与通过专业评估获得的结果相似,从而为评估相对独立的个体提供了一个有效的系统。