School of Nursing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Suzhou Vocational Health College, Suzhou, China.
Nurs Open. 2021 Nov;8(6):3073-3085. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1020. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
The study is aimed to develop and psychometrically test the Comprehensive Ability of Older People Assessment scale and classify the ability grades.
A cross-sectional design was used for instrument development.
The Comprehensive Ability of Older People Assessment scale was developed by a sample of 971 older people from 4 long-term care institutions in China. The data were collected between April 2018 and March 2020. One-way analysis of variance and multiple regression analysis was used to screen scale items, while focus group interviews were used to integrate the subjective and objective items. Confirmative factor analysis and expert judgment were applied to explore construct validity. Reliability was explored through internal consistency estimation using Cronbach's alpha and homogeneity evaluation using corrected item-total correlations. Cluster analysis and discriminant analysis were used to segment the comprehensive ability assessment scores and discriminant function was established to determine the boundary value of each segment, using correlation analysis to perform reverse verification.
Factor analysis yielded 40 items with six dimensions, including "mentation and cognitive," "perception and communication," "emotional problems," "mental and behavioural problems," "daily life and social participation," and "skin and oral status." The Cronbach's α was 0.951, while the dimensions showed Cronbach's α values ranging from 0.760-0.946. The rationality and scientificity of this scale were proved by the correlation analysis of reverse validation.
The 4-grade Comprehensive Ability of Older People Assessment scale is proved to be with good validity and reliability and should be considered for institutional assessors.
Assessors can accurately evaluate older people's health status and nursing needs through this scale in long-term care institutions, communities and hospitals, so as to provide accurate and high-quality nursing services. It will become a scientific basis for the government to offer accurate pension subsidies, purchase pension services scientifically for older people and establish third-party objective evaluation and supervision.
本研究旨在开发和心理测量老年人综合能力评估量表,并对能力等级进行分类。
采用横断面设计进行工具开发。
通过来自中国 4 家长期护理机构的 971 名老年人样本开发了老年人综合能力评估量表。数据收集于 2018 年 4 月至 2020 年 3 月之间。采用单因素方差分析和多元回归分析筛选量表条目,同时采用焦点小组访谈将主观和客观条目整合在一起。采用验证性因子分析和专家判断来探索结构效度。采用 Cronbach's alpha 进行内部一致性评估和校正项目总分相关系数进行同质性评估来探索信度。采用聚类分析和判别分析对综合能力评估得分进行分段,并建立判别函数确定每个分段的边界值,采用相关分析进行反向验证。
因子分析得出 40 个条目,具有 6 个维度,包括“思维与认知”、“感知与沟通”、“情绪问题”、“心理和行为问题”、“日常生活和社会参与”以及“皮肤和口腔状况”。Cronbach's α 为 0.951,而各维度的 Cronbach's α 值在 0.760-0.946 之间。反向验证的相关性分析证明了该量表的合理性和科学性。
四级老年人综合能力评估量表具有良好的效度和信度,可考虑用于机构评估员。
评估员可以通过该量表在长期护理机构、社区和医院中准确评估老年人的健康状况和护理需求,从而提供准确、高质量的护理服务。它将成为政府提供准确养老金补贴、科学为老年人购买养老金服务以及建立第三方客观评估和监督的科学依据。