Hill Jacob E, DeVault Travis L, Beasley James C, Rhodes Olin E, Belant Jerrold L
Carnivore Ecology Laboratory Forest and Wildlife Research Center Mississippi State University Mississippi State MS USA.
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Wildlife Services National Wildlife Research Center U.S. Department of Agriculture Sandusky OH USA.
Ecol Evol. 2018 Feb 1;8(5):2518-2526. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3840. eCollection 2018 Mar.
Vultures provide an essential ecosystem service through removal of carrion, but globally, many populations are collapsing and several species are threatened with extinction. Widespread declines in vulture populations could increase the availability of carrion to other organisms, but the ways facultative scavengers might respond to this increase have not been thoroughly explored. We aimed to determine whether facultative scavengers increase carrion consumption in the absence of vulture competition and whether they are capable of functionally replacing vultures in the removal of carrion biomass from the landscape. We experimentally excluded 65 rabbit carcasses from vultures during daylight hours and placed an additional 65 carcasses that were accessible to vultures in forested habitat in South Carolina, USA during summer (June-August). We used motion-activated cameras to compare carrion use by facultative scavenging species between the experimental and control carcasses. Scavenging by facultative scavengers did not increase in the absence of competition with vultures. We found no difference in scavenger presence between control carcasses and those from which vultures were excluded. Eighty percent of carcasses from which vultures were excluded were not scavenged by vertebrates, compared to 5% of carcasses that were accessible to vultures. At the end of the 7-day trials, there was a 10.1-fold increase in the number of experimental carcasses that were not fully scavenged compared to controls. Facultative scavengers did not functionally replace vultures during summer in our study. This finding may have been influenced by the time of the year in which the study took place, the duration of the trials, and the spacing of carcass sites. Our results suggest that under the warm and humid conditions of our study, facultative scavengers would not compensate for loss of vultures. Carcasses would persist longer in the environment and consumption of carrion would likely shift from vertebrates to decomposers. Such changes could have substantial implications for disease transmission, nutrient cycling, and ecosystem functioning.
秃鹫通过清除腐肉提供了一项至关重要的生态系统服务,但在全球范围内,许多秃鹫种群正在崩溃,有几个物种面临灭绝威胁。秃鹫种群的普遍减少可能会增加其他生物可获取的腐肉数量,但兼性食腐动物对这种增加的反应方式尚未得到充分探究。我们旨在确定兼性食腐动物在没有秃鹫竞争的情况下是否会增加对腐肉的消耗,以及它们是否能够在从景观中清除腐肉生物量方面在功能上替代秃鹫。我们在美国南卡罗来纳州夏季(6月至8月)的森林栖息地中,在白天将65具兔子尸体对秃鹫进行实验性排除,并另外放置65具秃鹫可以接触到的尸体。我们使用运动激活相机比较兼性食腐物种对实验尸体和对照尸体的腐肉利用情况。在没有与秃鹫竞争的情况下,兼性食腐动物的 scavenging 并未增加。我们发现对照尸体和排除了秃鹫的尸体之间在 scavenger 的存在上没有差异。排除了秃鹫的尸体中有80%未被脊椎动物 scavenged,而秃鹫可以接触到的尸体中这一比例为5%。在为期7天的试验结束时,与对照相比,未被完全 scavenged 的实验尸体数量增加了10.1倍。在我们的研究中,夏季兼性食腐动物并未在功能上替代秃鹫。这一发现可能受到了研究进行的年份时间、试验持续时间以及尸体放置地点间距的影响。我们的结果表明,在我们研究的温暖潮湿条件下,兼性食腐动物无法弥补秃鹫的损失。尸体在环境中存留的时间会更长,腐肉的消耗可能会从脊椎动物转向分解者。这种变化可能对疾病传播、养分循环和生态系统功能产生重大影响。 (注:原文中scavenging等词在中文语境下可能较难准确对应,这里保留了英文以便理解原文逻辑,你可根据实际情况进一步调整。)