Ball Jocasta, Løchen Maja-Lisa, Carrington Melinda J, Wiley Joshua F, Stewart Simon
Pre-Clinical Disease and Prevention, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Open Heart. 2018 Feb 7;5(1):e000755. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2017-000755. eCollection 2018.
Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is prevalent in atrial fibrillation (AF) and has the potential to contribute to poor outcomes. We investigated the influence of MCI on survival and rehospitalisation in patients with chronic forms of AF undergoing a home-based, AF-specific disease management intervention (home-based intervention (HBI)) or standard management (SM).
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment tool was administered at baseline (a score of <26/30 indicated MCI) in patients with AF randomised to HBI versus SM. Post hoc analyses of mortality and rehospitalisations during a minimum 24-month follow-up were conducted in the overall cohort and in each study group separately.
Of 260 patients (mean age 72±11, 47% female), 65% demonstrated MCI on screening (34% in SM; 31% in HBI). Overall, the number of days spent alive and out-of-hospital during follow-up (P=0.012) and all-cause rehospitalisation were influenced by MCI during follow-up (OR 3.16 (95% CI 1.46 to 6.84)) but MCI did not influence any outcomes in the SM group. However, survival was negatively influenced by MCI in the HBI group (P=0.036); those with MCI in this group were 5.6 times more likely to die during follow-up (OR 5.57 (95% CI 1.10 to 28.1)). Those with MCI in the HBI group also spent less days alive and out-of-hospital than those with no MCI (P=0.022). MCI was also identified as a significant independent correlate of shortest duration of event-free survival (OR 3.48 (95% CI 1.06 to 11.4)), all-cause rehospitalisation (OR 3.30 (95% CI 1.25 to 8.69)) and cardiovascular disease (CVD)-related rehospitalisation (OR 2.35 (95% CI 1.12 to 4.91)) in this group.
The effectiveness of home-based, disease management for patients with chronic forms of AF is negatively affected by comorbid MCI. The benefit of adjunctive support for patients with MCI on CVD-related health outcomes requires further investigation.
轻度认知障碍(MCI)在心房颤动(AF)患者中普遍存在,并且可能导致不良后果。我们调查了MCI对接受家庭式、特定于AF的疾病管理干预(家庭式干预(HBI))或标准管理(SM)的慢性AF患者的生存和再次住院的影响。
在随机分为HBI组和SM组的AF患者中,于基线时使用蒙特利尔认知评估工具(得分<26/30表明存在MCI)。对整个队列以及每个研究组分别进行至少24个月随访期间的死亡率和再次住院情况的事后分析。
在260例患者(平均年龄72±11岁,47%为女性)中,65%在筛查时显示存在MCI(SM组为34%;HBI组为31%)。总体而言,随访期间存活且未住院的天数(P = 0.012)以及全因再次住院情况受到随访期间MCI的影响(比值比3.16(95%置信区间1.46至6.84)),但MCI对SM组的任何结局均无影响。然而,MCI对HBI组的生存有负面影响(P = 0.036);该组中存在MCI的患者在随访期间死亡的可能性高5.6倍(比值比5.57(95%置信区间1.10至28.1))。HBI组中存在MCI的患者存活且未住院的天数也比无MCI的患者少(P = 0.022)。在该组中,MCI还被确定为无事件生存最短持续时间(比值比3.48(95%置信区间1.06至11.4))、全因再次住院(比值比3.30(95%置信区间1.25至8.69))以及心血管疾病(CVD)相关再次住院(比值比2.35(95%置信区间1.12至4.91))的显著独立相关因素。
合并存在的MCI对慢性AF患者家庭式疾病管理的有效性产生负面影响。MCI患者辅助支持对CVD相关健康结局的益处需要进一步研究。