• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

围手术期护理的改善与结直肠癌患者长期生存率的提高相关。

Improved perioperative care is associated with improved long-term survival in colorectal cancer.

作者信息

Poskus Eligijus, Kryzauskas Marius, Poskus Tomas, Mikalauskas Saulius, Samalavicius Narimantas Evaldas, Aliosin Oleg, Dailidenas Sarunas, Tamelis Algimantas, Saladzinskas Zilvinas, Lizdenis Paulius, Jakaitiene Audrone, Smailyte Giedre, Strupas Kestutis

机构信息

Institute of Clinical Medicine, Clinic of Gastroenterology, Nephrourology and Surgery, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.

Department of Surgery, Klaipeda University Hospital, 41 Liepojos Str, LT-92288, Klaipeda, Lithuania.

出版信息

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Jun;33(6):779-785. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3021-y. Epub 2018 Mar 12.

DOI:10.1007/s00384-018-3021-y
PMID:29532205
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare perioperative colorectal cancer care and survival in patient cohorts operated in 2005 and in 2010 in Lithuania.

METHODS

Comparative observational cohort study was performed. The study was conducted in the three Lithuanian cancer hospitals. Patients, who underwent curative surgery for colorectal cancer in 2005 and 2010, were included. Demographic characteristics, distribution of the tumors, preoperative diagnostics and staging, surgical treatment, the quality of pathological examination, morbidity, and mortality were analyzed. One- and 5-year overall survival data were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Colorectal cancer diagnostics and treatment improved from 2005 to 2010 significantly. The disease was identified as stage III-IV for 45 vs. 48% of the patients; however, computed tomography staging scan was performed only for 5.9 vs. 17.8% in 2005 and 2010, respectively. Laparoscopic operations were performed 1.5 vs. 10.5% and abdominoperineal resections-42.7 vs. 31.7% in 2005 and 2010, respectively. The number of harvested lymph nodes was mentioned in 55.8 vs. 97.7% of the cases, whereas more than 12 lymph nodes were examined in 18 vs. 66.6% of cases after histological examination. The overall 5-year survival was 52.1 vs. 63.1% (p < 0.0001), while the 5-year survival of the patients with stage IV of disease was 4.2 vs. 17.8% in 2005 and 2010, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative investigation, surgical treatment, pathological examination, and postoperative course are associated with improved overall survival in colorectal cancer patients, undergoing curative surgery in the resource-limited settings.

摘要

目的

比较2005年和2010年在立陶宛接受手术的患者队列中围手术期结直肠癌护理情况及生存率。

方法

进行了一项比较性观察队列研究。该研究在立陶宛的三家癌症医院开展。纳入2005年和2010年接受结直肠癌根治性手术的患者。分析了人口统计学特征、肿瘤分布、术前诊断与分期、手术治疗、病理检查质量、发病率和死亡率。比较了两组的1年和5年总生存数据。

结果

从2005年到2010年,结直肠癌的诊断和治疗有显著改善。疾病被确定为III-IV期的患者比例分别为45%和48%;然而,2005年和2010年分别仅对5.9%和17.8%的患者进行了计算机断层扫描分期扫描。2005年和2010年腹腔镜手术的实施率分别为1.5%和10.5%,腹会阴联合切除术的实施率分别为42.7%和31.7%。55.8%和97.7%的病例提及了采集的淋巴结数量,而组织学检查后,18%和66.6%的病例检查了超过12个淋巴结。总体5年生存率分别为52.1%和63.1%(p<0.0001),2005年和2010年疾病IV期患者的5年生存率分别为4.2%和17.8%。

结论

在资源有限地区接受根治性手术的结直肠癌患者中,术前检查、手术治疗、病理检查和术后病程与总体生存率的提高相关。

相似文献

1
Improved perioperative care is associated with improved long-term survival in colorectal cancer.围手术期护理的改善与结直肠癌患者长期生存率的提高相关。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Jun;33(6):779-785. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3021-y. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
2
Aspects of survival from colorectal cancer in Denmark.丹麦结直肠癌的生存情况
Dan Med J. 2012 Apr;59(4):B4428.
3
Laparoscopic versus conventional palliative resection for incurable, symptomatic stage IV colorectal cancer: impact on short-term results.腹腔镜手术与传统姑息性切除术治疗无法治愈的有症状的IV期结直肠癌:对短期结果的影响
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011 Jun;21(3):184-7. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31821db75e.
4
Surgical outcomes for colon and rectal cancer over a decade: results from a consecutive monocentric experience in 902 unselected patients.十年间结肠癌和直肠癌的手术结果:来自902例未经选择患者的连续单中心经验结果。
World J Surg Oncol. 2007 Jul 4;5:73. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-5-73.
5
Laparoscopy as a prognostic factor in curative resection for node positive colorectal cancer: results for a single-institution nonrandomized prospective trial.腹腔镜检查作为淋巴结阳性结直肠癌根治性切除的预后因素:单机构非随机前瞻性试验结果
Surg Endosc. 2004 Jul;18(7):1130-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9152-3. Epub 2004 May 27.
6
Short- and long-term outcomes following laparoscopic open surgery for pathological T4 colorectal cancer: 10 years of experience in a single center.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗病理性 T4 结直肠癌的近期和远期疗效:单中心 10 年经验
World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan 7;24(1):76-86. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i1.76.
7
Palliative laparoscopic resections for Stage IV colorectal cancer.IV期结直肠癌的姑息性腹腔镜切除术
Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Feb;49(2):213-8. doi: 10.1007/s10350-005-0260-0.
8
Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: Laparoscopic vs robotic surgery.中低位直肠癌的全直肠系膜切除术:腹腔镜手术与机器人手术对比
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Apr 7;22(13):3602-10. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i13.3602.
9
Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic vs open surgery for stages II and III rectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗II期和III期直肠癌的长期肿瘤学结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 May 14;21(18):5505-12. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i18.5505.
10
Comparative benefits of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in octogenarians: a case-matched comparison of short- and long-term outcomes with middle-aged patients.八旬老人行腹腔镜结直肠癌手术的比较获益:与中年患者短期和长期结局的病例匹配比较
Surg Today. 2017 May;47(5):587-594. doi: 10.1007/s00595-016-1410-9. Epub 2016 Aug 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Hemopatch serosal reinforcement in right colectomy: transforming anastomotic leak patterns and severity compared to second-line suture technique-a 10-Year Retrospective Cohort Study of 352 patients.右半结肠切除术中血补丁浆膜加固术:与二线缝合技术相比,改变吻合口漏的模式和严重程度——一项对352例患者的10年回顾性队列研究
Updates Surg. 2025 Aug 23. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02351-6.
2
Hand Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Surgical and Oncological Outcomes from a Single Tertiary Referral Centre.结直肠癌的手辅助腹腔镜手术:来自单一三级转诊中心的手术及肿瘤学结果
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 29;11(13):3781. doi: 10.3390/jcm11133781.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Pathologic Outcomes of Laparoscopic vs Open Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开腹直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的病理结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Surg. 2017 Apr 19;152(4):e165665. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.5665.
2
Colorectal cancer: Quality of surgical care in Michigan.结直肠癌:密歇根州的外科护理质量。
Am J Surg. 2017 Mar;213(3):548-552. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.11.038. Epub 2016 Nov 27.
3
Danish Colorectal Cancer Group Database.丹麦结直肠癌组数据库
Predictors of Quality of Life Six Years after Curative Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Results of the Prospective Multicenter Study.
根治性结直肠癌手术后 6 年生活质量的预测因素:前瞻性多中心研究的结果。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Mar 26;58(4):482. doi: 10.3390/medicina58040482.
4
Short and long-term outcomes of elderly patients undergoing left-sided colorectal resection with primary anastomosis for cancer.老年患者左侧大肠癌切除并一期吻合术的短期和长期疗效。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Dec 7;21(1):682. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02648-2.
5
Comparison of Changes in Disease-Free and Overall Survival of Resectable Rectal Adenocarcinoma between 2010 and 2015.2010年与2015年可切除直肠腺癌无病生存率和总生存率变化的比较
Visc Med. 2020 Apr;36(2):144-149. doi: 10.1159/000500730. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
6
Suicide risk among colorectal cancer patients in Lithuania.立陶宛结直肠癌患者的自杀风险。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019 Mar;34(3):555-558. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-03228-4. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
7
Repeating of local therapy of distant metastases increases overall survival in patients with synchronous metastasized rectal cancer-a monocentric analysis.重复局部治疗远处转移可提高同时性转移性直肠癌患者的总生存率——一项单中心分析
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Nov;33(11):1533-1541. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3113-8. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Oct 25;8:465-468. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S99481. eCollection 2016.
4
Prospective multicenter registration study of colorectal cancer: significant variations in radicality and oncosurgical quality-Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research Protocol SAKK 40/00.结直肠癌前瞻性多中心注册研究:根治性及肿瘤外科手术质量的显著差异——瑞士临床癌症研究组SAKK 40/00方案
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Jan;32(1):57-74. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2667-6. Epub 2016 Oct 7.
5
Laparoscopic surgery in patients with colon cancer: a population-based analysis.结肠癌患者的腹腔镜手术:一项基于人群的分析。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jun;31(6):2586-2595. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5266-2. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
6
Nationwide implementation of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes and long-term survival in a population-based cohort.全国范围内结肠癌腹腔镜手术的实施:基于人群队列的短期结果和长期生存情况
Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov;30(11):4853-4864. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4819-8. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
7
Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer: T1 and beyond? An evidence-based review.经肛门内镜显微手术治疗直肠癌:T1期及更晚期?循证综述
Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov;30(11):4841-4852. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4818-9. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
8
Anastomotic Leaks After Restorative Resections for Rectal Cancer Compromise Cancer Outcomes and Survival.直肠癌根治性切除术后吻合口漏会影响癌症治疗效果和生存率。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2016 Mar;59(3):236-44. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000554.
9
Nationwide Outcomes Measurement in Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Improving Quality and Reducing Costs.全国结直肠癌手术结果测量:提高质量与降低成本
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Jan;222(1):19-29.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.09.020. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
10
Do Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) processes influence survival in patients with colorectal cancer? A population-based experience.多学科团队(MDT)流程是否会影响结直肠癌患者的生存率?一项基于人群的经验。
BMC Cancer. 2015 Oct 13;15:686. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1683-1.