• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关节镜下带三维生物胶原补片增强的肩袖修补术治疗中到大面积肩袖撕裂:一项随机对照研究。

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With Graft Augmentation of 3-Dimensional Biological Collagen for Moderate to Large Tears: A Randomized Controlled Study.

机构信息

Center for Sport Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.

Dr. Li Dak Sum & Yip Yio Chin Center for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2018 May;46(6):1424-1431. doi: 10.1177/0363546518756978. Epub 2018 Mar 13.

DOI:10.1177/0363546518756978
PMID:29533674
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Due to the highly organized tissue and avascular nature of the rotator cuff, rotator cuff tears have limited ability to heal after the tendon is reinserted directly on the greater tubercle of the humerus. Consequently, retears are among the most common complications after rotator cuff repair. Augmentation of rotator cuff repairs with patches has been an active area of research in recent years to reduce retear rate.

HYPOTHESIS

Graft augmentation with 3D collagen could prevent retears of the repaired tendon and improve tendon-bone healing in moderate to large rotator cuff tears.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled study; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized controlled study was performed in a consecutive series of 112 patients age 50 to 85 years who underwent rotator cuff repair with the suture-bridge technique (58 patients, control group) or the suture-bridge technique augmented with 3-dimensional (3D) collagen (54 patients, study group). All patients were followed for 28.2 months (range, 24-36 months). Visual analog scale score for pain, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score, and Constant score were determined. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed pre- and postoperatively (at a minimum of 24 months) to evaluate the integrity of the rotator cuff and the retear rate of the repaired tendon. Three patients in each group had biopsies at nearly 24 months after surgery with histological assessment and transmission electron microscopy.

RESULTS

A total of 104 patients completed the final follow-up. At the 12-month follow-up, the UCLA shoulder score was 28.1 ± 1.9 in the study group, which was significantly better than that in the control group (26.9 ± 2.1, P = .002). The Constant score was also significantly better in the study group (87.1 ± 3.2) than in the control group (84.9 ± 4.2, P = .003). However, at the final follow-up, no significant differences were found in the UCLA shoulder scores (29.4 ± 1.9 in the control group and 30.0 ± 1.6 in the study group, P = .052) or Constant scores (89.9 ± 3.2 in the control group and 90.8 ± 3.5 in the study group, P = .18). In terms of structural integrity, more patients in the study group had a favorable type I retear grade (18/51) than in the control group (10/53) ( P = .06). The postoperative retear rate was 34.0% in the control group and 13.7% in the study group, thus indicating a significantly lower retear rate in the study group ( P = .02). Biopsy specimens of the tendon-bone interface in 6 patients revealed more bone formation and more aligned fibers with larger diameters in the study group than in the control group. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were noted in either group.

CONCLUSION

3D collagen augmentation could provide effective treatment of moderate to large rotator cuff tears, providing substantial functional improvement, and could reduce the retear rate. This technique could also promote new tendon-bone formation, thus exerting a prominent effect on tendon-bone healing.

摘要

背景

由于肩袖组织高度有序且无血管,因此当肌腱直接重新插入肱骨大结节时,肩袖撕裂的愈合能力有限。因此,肩袖修复后的再撕裂是最常见的并发症之一。近年来,使用补片增强肩袖修复以降低再撕裂率是一个活跃的研究领域。

假设

用 3D 胶原进行移植物增强可以防止修复肌腱的再撕裂,并改善中到大的肩袖撕裂的肌腱-骨愈合。

研究设计

前瞻性随机对照研究;证据水平,2。

方法

对连续的 112 例年龄在 50 至 85 岁的患者进行了前瞻性、随机对照研究,这些患者接受了肩袖修复缝合桥技术(58 例,对照组)或缝合桥技术加 3D 胶原增强(54 例,研究组)。所有患者均随访 28.2 个月(范围,24-36 个月)。评估疼痛的视觉模拟评分、加州大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)肩部评分和常数评分。在术前和术后(至少 24 个月)进行磁共振成像,以评估肩袖的完整性和修复肌腱的再撕裂率。每组中有 3 名患者在手术后将近 24 个月时进行了活检,进行组织学评估和透射电子显微镜检查。

结果

共有 104 例患者完成了最终随访。在 12 个月的随访中,研究组的 UCLA 肩部评分(28.1 ± 1.9)明显优于对照组(26.9 ± 2.1,P =.002)。研究组的常数评分(87.1 ± 3.2)也明显优于对照组(84.9 ± 4.2,P =.003)。然而,在最终随访时,对照组和研究组的 UCLA 肩部评分(对照组 29.4 ± 1.9,研究组 30.0 ± 1.6,P =.052)或常数评分(对照组 89.9 ± 3.2,研究组 90.8 ± 3.5,P =.18)均无显著差异。在结构完整性方面,研究组中更多的患者(18/51)具有较好的 I 型再撕裂分级,而对照组中(10/53)则较少(P =.06)。对照组的术后再撕裂率为 34.0%,研究组为 13.7%,因此研究组的再撕裂率明显较低(P =.02)。6 名患者的肌腱-骨界面活检标本显示,研究组的骨形成和直径较大的纤维排列更整齐。两组均未发生术中或术后并发症。

结论

3D 胶原增强可有效治疗中到大的肩袖撕裂,提供实质性的功能改善,并降低再撕裂率。该技术还可以促进新的肌腱-骨形成,从而对肌腱-骨愈合产生显著影响。

相似文献

1
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With Graft Augmentation of 3-Dimensional Biological Collagen for Moderate to Large Tears: A Randomized Controlled Study.关节镜下带三维生物胶原补片增强的肩袖修补术治疗中到大面积肩袖撕裂:一项随机对照研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 May;46(6):1424-1431. doi: 10.1177/0363546518756978. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
2
Modified suture-bridge technique to prevent a marginal dog-ear deformity improves structural integrity after rotator cuff repair.改良缝线桥技术预防边缘“狗耳”畸形可改善肩袖修复后的结构完整性。
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Mar;43(3):597-605. doi: 10.1177/0363546514562175. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
3
Outcomes of Combined Bone Marrow Stimulation and Patch Augmentation for Massive Rotator Cuff Tears.联合骨髓刺激和补片增强治疗巨大肩袖撕裂的疗效
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Apr;44(4):963-71. doi: 10.1177/0363546515625044. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
4
Large Critical Shoulder Angle Has Higher Risk of Tendon Retear After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.大的临界肩角在关节镜肩袖修复后有更高的肌腱再撕裂风险。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Jul;46(8):1892-1900. doi: 10.1177/0363546518767634. Epub 2018 May 3.
5
Retear rate in the late postoperative period after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.关节镜下肩袖修复术后晚期再撕裂率
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Nov;42(11):2606-13. doi: 10.1177/0363546514547177. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
6
Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using a suture bridge technique: is the repair integrity actually maintained?关节镜下缝合桥技术修复肩袖撕裂:修复的完整性是否得到维持?
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Oct;39(10):2108-16. doi: 10.1177/0363546510397171. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
7
Does an Injection of Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Loaded in Fibrin Glue Influence Rotator Cuff Repair Outcomes? A Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.注射于纤维蛋白胶中的脂肪源性间充质干细胞对肩袖修复结果有影响吗?一项临床和磁共振成像研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jul;45(9):2010-2018. doi: 10.1177/0363546517702863. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
8
Clinical Outcomes of Modified Mason-Allen Single-Row Repair for Bursal-Sided Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears: Comparison With the Double-Row Suture-Bridge Technique.改良梅森-艾伦单排修复术治疗滑囊侧部分厚度肩袖撕裂的临床结果:与双排缝线桥技术的比较
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Aug;43(8):1976-82. doi: 10.1177/0363546515587718. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
9
Clinical outcomes of medialized single-row repair with fascia lata graft augmentation for large and massive rotator cuff tears.阔筋膜加强单排修复治疗大型及巨大肩袖撕裂的临床疗效。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Mar;33(3):e153-e161. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.07.020. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
10
Does Additional Biceps Augmentation Improve Rotator Cuff Healing and Clinical Outcomes in Anterior L-Shaped Rotator Cuff Tears? Clinical Comparisons With Arthroscopic Partial Repair.额外的肱二头肌增强术能否改善前侧L形肩袖撕裂的肩袖愈合情况及临床疗效?与关节镜下部分修复的临床比较。
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Nov;45(13):2982-2988. doi: 10.1177/0363546517720198. Epub 2017 Aug 18.

引用本文的文献

1
A meta-analysis of the outcomes of large to massive rotator cuff tears treated with direct repair, graft augmentation, or superior capsular reconstruction.一项关于采用直接修复、移植物增强或关节囊上重建治疗大型至巨大型肩袖撕裂结局的荟萃分析。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Aug 20;35(1):354. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04488-x.
2
Rotator Cuff Repair With Platelet-Rich Plasma Is Associated With Lower Retear Rates When Compared With Rotator Cuff Repair With Patch Augmentation: A Systematic Review.与使用补片增强的肩袖修复相比,富血小板血浆肩袖修复的再撕裂率更低:一项系统评价。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 Jul 30;13(7):23259671251358398. doi: 10.1177/23259671251358398. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Improved clinical outcomes after arthroscopic partial rotator cuff repair with rotator interval shift for the treatment of massive irreparable anterior L-shaped rotator cuff tears.
关节镜下部分肩袖修补术联合肩袖间隙移位治疗巨大不可修复性前L形肩袖撕裂后临床疗效改善。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jun 3;20(1):562. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05975-x.
4
Rotator Cuff Injury: Pathogenesis, Biomechanics, and Repair.肩袖损伤:发病机制、生物力学及修复
J Orthop Sports Med. 2024;6(4):231-248. doi: 10.26502/josm.511500167. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
5
Patch Augmentation in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Surgery-Review of Current Evidence and Newest Trends.关节镜下肩袖修补术中的补片增强——当前证据与最新趋势综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 27;13(17):5066. doi: 10.3390/jcm13175066.
6
Nanofiber Graft Therapy to Prevent Shoulder Stiffness and Adhesions after Rotator Cuff Tendon Repair: A Comprehensive Review.纳米纤维移植疗法预防肩袖肌腱修复术后肩部僵硬和粘连:一项综述
Biomedicines. 2024 Jul 19;12(7):1613. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12071613.
7
Interposition of acellular amniotic membrane at the tendon to bone interface would be better for healing than overlaying above the tendon to bone junction in the repair of rotator cuff injury.在肩袖损伤修复中,在肌腱与骨界面处植入脱细胞羊膜比在肌腱与骨连接处上方覆盖更有利于愈合。
Chin J Traumatol. 2025 May;28(3):187-192. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2024.04.001. Epub 2024 Apr 20.
8
Dermal Allograft Augmentation for Large and Massive Rotator Cuff Tears and Revisions: A Case Series.同种异体真皮移植修复大型和巨大型肩袖撕裂及翻修手术:病例系列
Cureus. 2024 Mar 27;16(3):e57090. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57090. eCollection 2024 Mar.
9
Outcomes of Superior Capsular Reconstruction Using the Long Head of the Biceps Tendon in Large to Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.使用肱二头肌长头肌腱进行上盂唇重建治疗大至巨大肩袖撕裂的疗效:一项荟萃分析与系统评价
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 12;13(4):1052. doi: 10.3390/jcm13041052.
10
Decellularized biological matrices for the repair of rotator cuff lesions: a systematic review of preclinical studies.用于修复肩袖损伤的去细胞生物基质:临床前研究的系统评价
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Feb 1;12:1345343. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1345343. eCollection 2024.