• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于社区的糖尿病预防与管理项目的感知益处与障碍

Perceived Benefits and Barriers of a Community-Based Diabetes Prevention and Management Program.

作者信息

Shawley-Brzoska Samantha, Misra Ranjita

机构信息

School of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2018 Mar 13;7(3):58. doi: 10.3390/jcm7030058.

DOI:10.3390/jcm7030058
PMID:29534005
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5867584/
Abstract

This study examined the perceptions of benefits of and barriers to participating in a community-based diabetes program to improve program effectiveness. The Diabetes Prevention and Management (DPM) program was a twenty-two session, 1-year program, modeled after the evidence-based National Diabetes Prevention Program and AADE7 Self-Care Behaviors framework. Community-based participatory research approach was used to culturally tailor the curriculum. Participants included overweight or obese adults with dysglycemia. A benefits and barriers survey was developed to gather information on participants' perception of the program, as well as information on demographics and health literacy levels. Eighty-nine adults participated in the DPM program (73% females; 62% diabetic; 77% had adequate health literacy); 79% of participants completed the benefits and barriers survey. Principal component analysis indicated two components representing benefits (Cronbach's α = 0.83) and barriers (α = 0.65). The majority perceived high benefits and low barriers to program participation; benefits included helpful interaction with health coach or program leader (73%), improved lifestyle modification (65%) due to the program, and satisfaction with the program (75%). Open-ended questions confirmed themes related to benefits of program participation, suggestion for programmatic improvements as well as barriers to participation. Participant feedback could be used to guide interventions and tailor future program implementation.

摘要

本研究调查了参与一项基于社区的糖尿病项目的益处和障碍认知,以提高项目成效。糖尿病预防与管理(DPM)项目为期一年,共二十二节课程,仿照循证的国家糖尿病预防项目和美国糖尿病教育者协会(AADE)的7项自我护理行为框架设立。采用基于社区的参与性研究方法对课程进行文化调适。参与者包括患有血糖异常的超重或肥胖成年人。开发了一份关于益处和障碍的调查问卷,以收集参与者对该项目的认知信息,以及人口统计学和健康素养水平方面的信息。89名成年人参与了DPM项目(73%为女性;62%患有糖尿病;77%具备足够的健康素养);79%的参与者完成了益处和障碍调查问卷。主成分分析表明存在两个分别代表益处(克朗巴哈系数α = 0.83)和障碍(α = 0.65)的成分。大多数人认为参与该项目的益处高而障碍低;益处包括与健康教练或项目负责人进行有益的互动(73%)、因该项目改善生活方式(65%)以及对该项目感到满意(75%)。开放式问题证实了与项目参与益处、项目改进建议以及参与障碍相关的主题。参与者的反馈可用于指导干预措施,并为未来项目的实施进行调适。

相似文献

1
Perceived Benefits and Barriers of a Community-Based Diabetes Prevention and Management Program.基于社区的糖尿病预防与管理项目的感知益处与障碍
J Clin Med. 2018 Mar 13;7(3):58. doi: 10.3390/jcm7030058.
2
The Healthy Lifestyle Change Program: a pilot of a community-based health promotion intervention for adults with developmental disabilities.健康生活方式改变计划:一项基于社区的针对成人发育障碍者的健康促进干预的试点研究。
Am J Prev Med. 2009 Dec;37(6 Suppl 1):S201-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.08.005.
3
A group-based lifestyle intervention for diabetes prevention in low- and middle-income country: implementation evaluation of the Kerala Diabetes Prevention Program.基于群体的生活方式干预在中低收入国家预防糖尿病:喀拉拉邦糖尿病预防计划的实施评估。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jul 18;13(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0791-0.
4
Self-management for obesity and cardio-metabolic fitness: description and evaluation of the lifestyle modification program of a randomised controlled trial.自我管理肥胖和心血管代谢健康:一项随机对照试验生活方式干预方案的描述和评估。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008 Oct 27;5:53. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-5-53.
5
Understanding Participants' Perceptions of Access to and Satisfaction With Chronic Disease Prevention Programs.了解参与者对慢性病预防计划的可及性和满意度的认知。
Health Educ Behav. 2019 Aug;46(4):689-699. doi: 10.1177/1090198118822710. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
6
Peer support to improve diabetes care: an implementation evaluation of the Australasian Peers for Progress Diabetes Program.同伴支持改善糖尿病护理:澳大利亚进步糖尿病同伴计划的实施评估。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Feb 17;18(1):262. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5148-8.
7
A Culturally Appropriate Self-Management Program for Hispanic Adults With Type 2 Diabetes and Low Health Literacy Skills.一项针对健康素养较低的西班牙裔2型糖尿病成年患者的文化适宜性自我管理项目。
J Transcult Nurs. 2017 Mar;28(2):187-194. doi: 10.1177/1043659615613418. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
8
Barriers to and Facilitators of Weight Management in Adults Using a Meal Replacement Program That Includes Health Coaching.采用包含健康指导的代餐计划的成年人体重管理的障碍与促进因素
J Prim Care Community Health. 2019 Jan-Dec;10:2150132719851643. doi: 10.1177/2150132719851643.
9
Differences in perspectives regarding diabetes management between health care providers and patients.医患双方在糖尿病管理方面的观点差异。
Transl Behav Med. 2018 May 23;8(3):328-340. doi: 10.1093/tbm/iby024.
10
Supporting At-Risk Youth and Their Families to Manage and Prevent Diabetes: Developing a National Partnership of Medical Residency Programs and High Schools.支持高危青少年及其家庭管理和预防糖尿病:建立医学住院医师培训项目与高中的全国性合作关系。
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 6;11(7):e0158477. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158477. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
A global call to action: strengthening strategies to combat dysglycemia and improve public health outcomes.全球行动呼吁:加强对抗血糖异常及改善公众健康结果的策略。
Front Public Health. 2025 May 30;13:1597128. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1597128. eCollection 2025.
2
EXERCISE BENEFITS AND BARRIERS IN AN EXTENSION-DELIVERED DIABETES PREVENTION PROGRAM.推广实施的糖尿病预防项目中的运动益处与障碍
Fam Consum Sci Res J. 2025 Mar;53(3). doi: 10.1111/fcsr.70000. Epub 2025 Feb 21.
3
Service users' experiences of, and engagement with, a nationally implemented digital diabetes prevention programme.服务使用者参与全国实施的数字糖尿病预防计划的经历
Br J Health Psychol. 2025 Feb;30(1):e12787. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12787.
4
A pilot community-based Diabetes Prevention and Management Program for adults with diabetes and prediabetes.一项针对患有糖尿病和糖尿病前期的成年人的基于社区的糖尿病预防与管理试点项目。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Oct 29;8(1):e179. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.623. eCollection 2024.
5
"A Wake-Up Call": A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Barriers to Type 2 Diabetes Prevention After Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.“警钟”:妊娠期糖尿病后2型糖尿病预防障碍的混合方法分析
Diabetes Spectr. 2024 May 3;37(4):349-359. doi: 10.2337/ds23-0072. eCollection 2024 Fall.
6
Why Do People Choose to Enroll or Not Enroll in the National Diabetes Prevention Program Lifestyle Change Program? A Mixed-Methods Analysis From a Sample of Adults With a Prediabetes Diagnosis.为什么有些人选择参加或不参加国家糖尿病预防计划生活方式改变计划?一项基于有前期糖尿病诊断的成年人样本的混合方法分析。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241282862. doi: 10.1177/21501319241282862.
7
Experiences of online group support for engaging and supporting participants in the National Health Service Digital Diabetes Prevention Programme: A qualitative interview study.关于在国民保健服务数字糖尿病预防计划中吸引和支持参与者的在线团体支持经验:一项定性访谈研究
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2024 Apr;29(2):100-110. doi: 10.1177/13558196231212846. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
8
How the Behavior Change Content of a Nationally Implemented Digital Diabetes Prevention Program Is Understood and Used by Participants: Qualitative Study of Fidelity of Receipt and Enactment.参与者如何理解和使用全国实施的数字糖尿病预防计划中的行为改变内容:接受和实施的忠实性定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jan 11;25:e41214. doi: 10.2196/41214.
9
Mobile Virtual Reality Versus Mobile 360° Video to Promote Enrollment in the Diabetes Prevention Program Among Hispanic Adults: Pilot Study.移动虚拟现实与移动360°视频在促进西班牙裔成年人参与糖尿病预防计划中的应用:一项试点研究。
JMIR Diabetes. 2022 Mar 17;7(1):e26013. doi: 10.2196/26013.
10
Motivation and Problem Solving Versus Mobile 360° Videos to Promote Enrollment in the National Diabetes Prevention Program's Lifestyle Change Program Among People With Prediabetes: Protocol for a Randomized Trial.动机与问题解决法对比移动360°视频以促进糖尿病前期人群参与国家糖尿病预防计划的生活方式改变项目:一项随机试验的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Jun 14;10(6):e28884. doi: 10.2196/28884.

本文引用的文献

1
The Effect of Adherence to Dietary Tracking on Weight Loss: Using HLM to Model Weight Loss over Time.饮食跟踪依从性对减肥的影响:使用多层线性模型分析随时间推移的体重变化。
J Diabetes Res. 2017;2017:6951495. doi: 10.1155/2017/6951495. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
2
Diabetes Self-Management Education Programs in Nonmetropolitan Counties - United States, 2016.美国非都市县的糖尿病自我管理教育项目,2016年
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017 Apr 28;66(10):1-6. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6610a1.
3
A Critical Examination of the Use of Trained Health Coaches to Decrease the Metabolic Syndrome for Participants of a Community-Based Diabetes Prevention and Management Program.对训练有素的健康教练在基于社区的糖尿病预防与管理项目参与者中降低代谢综合征方面的应用进行批判性审视。
J Healthc Commun. 2016;1(4). doi: 10.4172/2472-1654.100038. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
4
Hypertension self-management: a home run for patients and payers.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014 Mar;7(2):205-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.000885. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
5
Community health awareness of diabetes (CHAD): description of a community-wide diabetes awareness demonstration program and its feasibility.社区糖尿病意识调查(CHAD):一项社区范围糖尿病意识示范项目的描述及其可行性。
Can J Diabetes. 2013 Oct;37(5):294-300. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2013.07.001.
6
Structural role of perceived benefits and barriers to self-care in patients with diabetes.糖尿病患者自我护理中感知到的益处和障碍的结构作用。
J Educ Health Promot. 2013 Jul 31;2:37. doi: 10.4103/2277-9531.115831.
7
Self-measured blood pressure monitoring in the management of hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.自我血压监测在高血压管理中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Aug 6;159(3):185-94. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-3-201308060-00008.
8
Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2012.2012 年美国糖尿病的经济成本。
Diabetes Care. 2013 Apr;36(4):1033-46. doi: 10.2337/dc12-2625. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
9
Diabetes care and outcomes: disparities across rural America.糖尿病护理和结局:美国农村的差异。
J Community Health. 2010 Aug;35(4):365-74. doi: 10.1007/s10900-010-9259-0.
10
Glycemic control and complications in type 2 diabetes mellitus.血糖控制与 2 型糖尿病并发症。
Am J Med. 2010 Mar;123(3 Suppl):S3-11. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.12.004.