Suppr超能文献

门诊麻醉中舒芬太尼与芬太尼持续输注的比较。

Comparison of continuous sufentanil and fentanyl infusions for outpatient anaesthesia.

作者信息

Phitayakorn P, Melnick B M, Vicinie A F

出版信息

Can J Anaesth. 1987 May;34(3 ( Pt 1)):242-5. doi: 10.1007/BF03015160.

Abstract

Fifty ASA physical status class I or II patients undergoing outpatient D & C (dilatation and curettage of the uterus) were studied. Patients were divided into two groups in a random double-blind manner and given either a fentanyl bolus 0.7 microgram X kg-1 followed by continuous fentanyl infusion of 0-50 micrograms X min-1 or sufentanil bolus 0.1 microgram X kg-1 followed by continuous sufentanil infusion of 0-7 micrograms X min-1 as an adjuvant to thiopentone, nitrous oxide: oxygen anaesthesia. Patients were followed throughout the recovery process with respect to level of consciousness, nausea, vomiting, pain, and discharge time. Groups were equal with respect to awakening and discharge time. The incidence of nausea (p less than 0.05) and pain requiring analgesics (p less than 0.05) were less in the sufentanil group. It is concluded that the technique of continuous sufentanil infusion was superior to fentanyl in healthy outpatients undergoing D & C.

摘要

对50例接受门诊刮宫术(子宫扩张刮宫术)的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况为I或II级的患者进行了研究。患者被随机双盲分为两组,一组给予0.7微克/千克的芬太尼推注,随后以0 - 50微克/分钟的速度持续输注芬太尼;另一组给予0.1微克/千克的舒芬太尼推注,随后以0 - 7微克/分钟的速度持续输注舒芬太尼,作为硫喷妥钠、氧化亚氮:氧气麻醉的辅助用药。在整个恢复过程中,对患者的意识水平、恶心、呕吐、疼痛和出院时间进行跟踪。两组在苏醒和出院时间方面相当。舒芬太尼组恶心的发生率(p < 0.05)和需要使用镇痛药的疼痛发生率(p < 0.05)较低。得出的结论是,在接受刮宫术的健康门诊患者中,持续输注舒芬太尼的技术优于芬太尼。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验