Department of Nephrology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Ave, Wuhan 430030, Hubei, China.
Department of Orthopaedics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, 154 Anshan Road, Heping District, China.
Int J Surg. 2018 May;53:38-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Mar 11.
Thoracolumbar fractures is a frequent injury occurring in spinal trauma. Outcomes and complications between combined pedicle screw fixation at the fracture vertebrae (AFV) and conventional method cross the fracture vertebrae (CFV) are still controversial. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate differences in outcome variables between these two operative methods.
PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and CNKI were searched with the terms "thoracolumbar fractures", "posterior", "pedicle screw fixation", and "clinical trial" from Jan 1980 to July 2017. Two reviewers independently screened the studies for eligibility, evaluated the quality and extracted data from eligible studies, with confirmation by cross-checking. The major results and conclusions were concluded, and the different complication rates and functional outcomes were compared. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.
Eighteen randomized controlled trials involving 1280 patients were eligible. The pooled data revealed that AFV group might be associated with more intraoperative blood loss (MD = 9.84, 95%CI 7.45 to 12.22) and longer operation time (MD = 1.97, 95%CI 0.17 to 3.77) when compared with CFV group. However, AFV group significantly improved visual analogue scale (VAS) (MD = -1.27, 95%CI -1.70 to -0.83), anterior vertebral height (AVH) (MD = 7.58, 95%CI 3.99 to 11.17), short-term Cobb angle (MD = -1.29, 95%CI -2.39 to -0.19), long-term Cobb angle (MD = -4.47, 95%CI -7.30 to -1.63) and loss of long-term correction efficacy (MD = -6.56, 95%CI -7.49 to -5.62) after surgery. Moreover, compared with the CFV group, the AFV group had lower rate of implant failure (MD = 0.16, 95%CI 0.07 to 0.36). Both techniques had similar hospital stay (MD = 0.25, 95%CI -0.52 to 1.03) and postoperative infection (MD = 0.53, 95%CI 0.13 to 2.23).
Though with a more operation time and intraoperative hemorrhage, combined pedicle screw fixation at the fracture veterbrae may be better than traditional fixation cross the fracture level alone for thoracolumbar fractures.
胸腰椎骨折是脊柱创伤中常见的损伤。骨折椎体(AFV)联合经皮椎弓根螺钉固定与传统跨骨折椎体(CFV)固定的疗效和并发症仍存在争议。因此,本研究旨在评估这两种手术方法的结果变量差异。
检索 1980 年 1 月至 2017 年 7 月期间PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、EMBASE 和中国知网(CNKI)上的“thoracolumbar fractures”、“posterior”、“pedicle screw fixation”和“clinical trial”等术语。两名审查员独立筛选研究的合格性,评估质量并从合格研究中提取数据,通过交叉核对进行确认。总结主要结果和结论,并比较不同并发症发生率和功能结果。使用 RevMan 5.3 软件进行荟萃分析。
纳入了 18 项随机对照试验,共 1280 名患者。汇总数据显示,与 CFV 组相比,AFV 组术中失血量(MD=9.84,95%CI 7.45 至 12.22)和手术时间(MD=1.97,95%CI 0.17 至 3.77)可能更长。然而,AFV 组在视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分(MD=-1.27,95%CI-1.70 至-0.83)、前柱高度(AVH)(MD=7.58,95%CI 3.99 至 11.17)、短期 Cobb 角(MD=-1.29,95%CI-2.39 至-0.19)、长期 Cobb 角(MD=-4.47,95%CI-7.30 至-1.63)和长期矫正效果丢失(MD=-6.56,95%CI-7.49 至-5.62)方面术后改善更明显。此外,与 CFV 组相比,AFV 组的内固定失败率较低(MD=0.16,95%CI 0.07 至 0.36)。两种技术的住院时间(MD=0.25,95%CI-0.52 至 1.03)和术后感染(MD=0.53,95%CI 0.13 至 2.23)相似。
尽管骨折椎体联合经皮椎弓根螺钉固定的手术时间和术中出血量较多,但对于胸腰椎骨折,与传统跨骨折椎体固定相比,这种固定方式可能更优。