• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

激励小组成员是否能有效预测青少年早期的社会支配地位?行为策略、社交技能和性别对资源控制和受欢迎程度的直接和调节作用。

Is Inspiring Group Members an Effective Predictor of Social Dominance in Early Adolescence? Direct and Moderated Effects of Behavioral Strategies, Social Skills, and Gender on Resource Control and Popularity.

机构信息

Department of Child and Adolescent Studies, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

School of Mathematical Sciences, Science and Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

J Youth Adolesc. 2018 Sep;47(9):1813-1829. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0830-9. Epub 2018 Mar 13.

DOI:10.1007/s10964-018-0830-9
PMID:29536330
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6105195/
Abstract

Dominance in the peer group is important for adolescents. Resource Control Theory posits that both coercive and prosocial (positively assertive) strategies are associated with dominance. Combining Resource Control Theory with Socioanalytic Theory on personality, we hypothesized that inspiring group members would be an additional effective strategy. This study examined whether the three behavioral strategies and two types of social skills (social competence and manipulation) predicted dominance (resource control and popularity). Participants were 619 Dutch adolescents (M = 13.1; 47% female) in the first grade of secondary school. They completed peer reports (behavioral strategies and dominance) and self-reports (social skills). Only inspirational and coercive strategies substantially predicted dominance. Main effects of social skills emerged. Moderation between strategies and social skills was only observed for girls (e.g., coercive strategy use was associated with more popularity for girls with higher levels of social manipulation skills). This study furthered our understanding of the predictors of dominance in adolescence by including inspirational behavior and examining prosocial and antisocial skills.

摘要

同辈群体中的支配地位对青少年很重要。资源控制理论认为,强制性和亲社会(积极自信)策略都与支配地位有关。将资源控制理论与人格的社会分析理论相结合,我们假设激励群体成员将是另一种有效的策略。本研究考察了三种行为策略和两种社交技能(社交能力和操纵)是否预测支配地位(资源控制和受欢迎程度)。参与者是荷兰中学一年级的 619 名青少年(M=13.1;47%为女性)。他们完成了同伴报告(行为策略和支配地位)和自我报告(社交技能)。只有激励和强制性策略对支配地位有实质性的预测作用。社交技能的主要影响也显现出来了。仅在女孩中观察到策略和社交技能之间的调节作用(例如,对于社交操纵技能水平较高的女孩,使用强制性策略与更高的受欢迎程度相关)。本研究通过纳入激励行为并考察亲社会和反社会技能,进一步了解了青少年支配地位的预测因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43e4/6105195/c511d4bc245b/10964_2018_830_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43e4/6105195/6c7e7e0eb460/10964_2018_830_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43e4/6105195/c511d4bc245b/10964_2018_830_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43e4/6105195/6c7e7e0eb460/10964_2018_830_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43e4/6105195/c511d4bc245b/10964_2018_830_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Is Inspiring Group Members an Effective Predictor of Social Dominance in Early Adolescence? Direct and Moderated Effects of Behavioral Strategies, Social Skills, and Gender on Resource Control and Popularity.激励小组成员是否能有效预测青少年早期的社会支配地位?行为策略、社交技能和性别对资源控制和受欢迎程度的直接和调节作用。
J Youth Adolesc. 2018 Sep;47(9):1813-1829. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0830-9. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
2
Who Sets the Aggressive Popularity Norm in Classrooms? It's the Number and Strength of Aggressive, Prosocial, and Bi-Strategic Adolescents.谁在课堂上设定了激进的受欢迎规范?是具有攻击性、亲社会和双策略的青少年的数量和实力。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2020 Jan;48(1):13-27. doi: 10.1007/s10802-019-00571-0.
3
Behavioral Correlates of Prioritizing Popularity in Adolescence.青少年时期将受欢迎程度置于优先地位的行为关联
J Youth Adolesc. 2016 Dec;45(12):2444-2454. doi: 10.1007/s10964-015-0352-7. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
4
Popularity and Resource Control Goals as Predictors of Adolescent Indirect Aggression.受欢迎程度和资源控制目标作为青少年间接攻击行为的预测因素
J Genet Psychol. 2015 May-Aug;176(3-4):253-9. doi: 10.1080/00221325.2015.1048661.
5
A Test of the Bistrategic Control Hypothesis of Adolescent Popularity.青少年流行的双策略控制假说检验。
Child Dev. 2020 May;91(3):e635-e648. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13269. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
6
["Violence is no solution but a cool alternative?" Why bullies are so effective].["暴力并非解决之道,而是一种冷酷的选择?”为何霸凌者如此有效]
Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr. 2013;62(3):197-213. doi: 10.13109/prkk.2013.62.3.197.
7
Peer status and aggression as predictors of dating popularity in adolescence.同伴地位和攻击性对青少年约会受欢迎程度的预测作用。
J Youth Adolesc. 2015 Mar;44(3):683-95. doi: 10.1007/s10964-014-0174-z. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
8
Parental social coaching promotes adolescent peer acceptance across the middle school transition.父母的社交指导有助于青少年在初中过渡阶段被同伴接纳。
J Fam Psychol. 2017 Sep;31(6):668-678. doi: 10.1037/fam0000314. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
9
Structure Matters: The Role of Clique Hierarchy in the Relationship Between Adolescent Social Status and Aggression and Prosociality.结构至关重要:小团体层级在青少年社会地位与攻击性及亲社会行为关系中的作用
J Youth Adolesc. 2015 Dec;44(12):2257-74. doi: 10.1007/s10964-015-0310-4. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
10
Adolescents' social status goals: relationships to social status insecurity, aggression, and prosocial behavior.青少年的社会地位目标:与社会地位不安全感、攻击性和亲社会行为的关系。
J Youth Adolesc. 2014 Jan;43(1):146-60. doi: 10.1007/s10964-013-9939-z. Epub 2013 Mar 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying Relationally Aggressive Students: How Aligned are Teachers and Peers?识别具有关系攻击行为的学生:教师与同伴的看法有多一致?
School Ment Health. 2022 Sep;14(3):709-723. doi: 10.1007/s12310-021-09498-8. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
2
How to Get the Biggest Slice of the Cake. A Comparative View of Social Behaviour and Resource Access in Human Children and Nonhuman Primates.如何分得最大一块蛋糕。人类儿童与非人类灵长类动物社会行为及资源获取的比较研究
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 3;11:584815. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.584815. eCollection 2020.
3
Maternal Programming of Social Dominance via Milk Cytokines.

本文引用的文献

1
Status Differences in Target-Specific Prosocial Behavior and Aggression.目标特定亲社会行为和攻击行为中的地位差异。
J Youth Adolesc. 2016 Sep;45(9):1836-48. doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0481-7. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
2
Popularity and Resource Control Goals as Predictors of Adolescent Indirect Aggression.受欢迎程度和资源控制目标作为青少年间接攻击行为的预测因素
J Genet Psychol. 2015 May-Aug;176(3-4):253-9. doi: 10.1080/00221325.2015.1048661.
3
Prospective associations between prosocial behavior and social dominance in early childhood: are sharers the best leaders?
通过乳汁细胞因子对社会优势进行母体编程。
iScience. 2020 Aug 21;23(8):101357. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101357. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
4
To be or not to be an inclusive teacher: Are empathy and social dominance relevant factors to positive attitudes towards inclusive education?做或不做包容型教师:同理心和社会支配地位是对包容型教育持积极态度的相关因素吗?
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 10;14(12):e0225993. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225993. eCollection 2019.
5
The Moderating Role of Clique Hierarchical Organization on Resource Control by Central Clique Members.小团体层次结构对中心小团体成员资源控制的调节作用。
J Youth Adolesc. 2019 Feb;48(2):359-371. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0972-9. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
幼儿期亲社会行为与社会主导地位之间的前瞻性关联:分享者是最佳领导者吗?
J Genet Psychol. 2015 Jan-Apr;176(1-2):130-8. doi: 10.1080/00221325.2015.1018860.
4
Social dominance in childhood and its evolutionary underpinnings: why it matters and what we can do.童年时期的社会支配地位及其进化基础:为何重要以及我们能做什么。
Pediatrics. 2015 Mar;135 Suppl 2:S31-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-3549D.
5
Aggressive effects of prioritizing popularity in early adolescence.青春期早期将受欢迎程度置于优先地位的不良影响。
Aggress Behav. 2014 May-Jun;40(3):204-13. doi: 10.1002/ab.21518. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
6
The association between forms of aggression, leadership, and social status among urban youth.城市青年的攻击形式、领导能力和社会地位之间的关系。
J Youth Adolesc. 2013 Feb;42(2):263-74. doi: 10.1007/s10964-012-9837-9. Epub 2012 Oct 20.
7
Bullying as strategic behavior: relations with desired and acquired dominance in the peer group.欺凌作为一种策略行为:与同伴群体中期望和获得的支配地位的关系。
J Sch Psychol. 2011 Jun;49(3):339-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2011.03.003. Epub 2011 Apr 16.
8
On the Use, the Misuse, and the Very Limited Usefulness of Cronbach's Alpha.论克朗巴哈α系数的使用、误用及非常有限的实用性。
Psychometrika. 2009 Mar;74(1):107-120. doi: 10.1007/s11336-008-9101-0. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
9
Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: a meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment.童年和青少年时期的直接和间接攻击行为:对性别差异、相互关系以及与适应不良关系的元分析综述
Child Dev. 2008 Sep-Oct;79(5):1185-229. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01184.x.
10
Moderators of the association between relational aggression and perceived popularity.关系攻击与感知受欢迎程度之间关联的调节因素。
Aggress Behav. 2008 Nov-Dec;34(6):563-76. doi: 10.1002/ab.20280.