School of Environment and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution and Health, Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510632, China.
Department of Environmental Studies and Sciences and Department of Chemistry, The University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3B 2E9, Canada.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Apr;25(12):11319-11332. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-1692-0. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
An increasing number of reports have been published concerning microplastic (MP) pollution in aquatic environments. Methods used in these studies continue to be updated and lack standardization, so that an up-to-date review pertaining methods for MP research is needed. This critical review examines the analytical methods, including sampling, identification, and quantitation, for MP research. Samples are generally collected from water, sediment, and biota gastrointestinal tract. Manta nets or trawls are prevalently used in surface water sampling, while direct shoveling or box-corer grab are commonly applied in sediment sampling. Microplastics in biota are generally obtained by dissecting organisms and separating livers, gills, and guts. Density separation is frequently chosen to separate MPs from sample matrices. Chemical digestion can dissolve other organic materials and isolate MPs for further identification. Visual sorting should be combined with chemical composition analysis to better identify the polymer type. Pyrolysis or thermal decomposition gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and Raman spectroscopy are currently the main technologies for MP identification. Units prevalently used to express MP abundance in water, sediment, and biota are "particles per m," "particles per m," and "particles per individual," respectively. As MP abundances often varied with the methods used, we recommend that analytical protocols of MPs should better be standardized and optimized. Despite the important progress in analysis of MPs, detection technologies for identifying nano-sized plastic particles are still lacking, and therefore should be developed swiftly.
越来越多的报告涉及到水生环境中的微塑料 (MP) 污染。这些研究中使用的方法仍在不断更新,缺乏标准化,因此需要对有关 MP 研究方法的最新综述。本综述批判性地检查了用于 MP 研究的分析方法,包括采样、鉴定和定量。样品通常取自水、沉积物和生物胃肠道。使用 Manta 网或拖网进行地表水采样,而直接铲取或箱式抓斗常用于沉积物采样。生物体内的微塑料通常通过解剖生物体并分离肝脏、鳃和肠道获得。密度分离常用于将 MPs 从样品基质中分离出来。化学消化可以溶解其他有机物质并分离 MPs 以进行进一步鉴定。视觉分类应与化学成分分析相结合,以更好地识别聚合物类型。热解或热分解气相色谱法与质谱法、傅里叶变换红外光谱法和拉曼光谱法是目前用于 MP 鉴定的主要技术。在水中、沉积物和生物体内分别用于表示 MP 丰度的单位是“每立方米颗粒”、“每立方米颗粒”和“每个个体颗粒”。由于 MP 丰度通常随所用方法而变化,因此建议更好地标准化和优化 MPs 的分析方案。尽管在 MPs 分析方面取得了重要进展,但用于识别纳米级塑料颗粒的检测技术仍然缺乏,因此应迅速开发这些技术。