Suppr超能文献

复发性流产评估结合流产组织 24 染色体微阵列分析,为超过 90%的患者提供了流产的可能或明确病因。

Recurrent pregnancy loss evaluation combined with 24-chromosome microarray of miscarriage tissue provides a probable or definite cause of pregnancy loss in over 90% of patients.

机构信息

Department of Biology, Rhodes College, Memphis, TN 38112, USA.

Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Memphis, TN 38120, USA.

出版信息

Hum Reprod. 2018 Apr 1;33(4):579-587. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey021.

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION

Will the addition of 24-chromosome microarray analysis on miscarriage tissue combined with the standard American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) evaluation for recurrent miscarriage explain most losses?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Over 90% of patients with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) will have a probable or definitive cause identified when combining genetic testing on miscarriage tissue with the standard ASRM evaluation for recurrent miscarriage.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

RPL is estimated to occur in 2-4% of reproductive age couples. A probable cause can be identified in approximately 50% of patients after an ASRM recommended workup including an evaluation for parental chromosomal abnormalities, congenital and acquired uterine anomalies, endocrine imbalances and autoimmune factors including antiphospholipid syndrome.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Single-center, prospective cohort study that included 100 patients seen in a private RPL clinic from 2014 to 2017. All 100 women had two or more pregnancy losses, a complete evaluation for RPL as defined by the ASRM, and miscarriage tissue evaluated by 24-chromosome microarray analysis after their second or subsequent miscarriage.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Frequencies of abnormal results for evidence-based diagnostic tests considered definite or probable causes of RPL (karyotyping for parental chromosomal abnormalities, and 24-chromosome microarray evaluation for products of conception (POC); pelvic sonohysterography, hysterosalpingogram, or hysteroscopy for uterine anomalies; immunological tests for lupus anticoagulant and anticardiolipin antibodies; and blood tests for thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), prolactin and hemoglobin A1c) were evaluated. We excluded cases where there was maternal cell contamination of the miscarriage tissue or if the ASRM evaluation was incomplete. A cost analysis for the evaluation of RPL was conducted to determine whether a proposed procedure of 24-chromome microarray evaluation followed by an ASRM RPL workup (for those RPL patients who had a normal 24-chromosome microarray evaluation) was more cost-efficient than conducting ASRM RPL workups on RPL patients followed by 24-chromosome microarray analysis (for those RPL patients who had a normal RPL workup).

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

A definite or probable cause of pregnancy loss was identified in the vast majority (95/100; 95%) of RPL patients when a 24-chromosome pair microarray evaluation of POC testing is combined with the standard ASRM RPL workup evaluation at the time of the second or subsequent loss. The ASRM RPL workup identified an abnormality and a probable explanation for pregnancy loss in only 45/100 or 45% of all patients. A definite abnormality was identified in 67/100 patients or 67% when initial testing was performed using 24-chromosome microarray analyses on the miscarriage tissue. Only 5/100 (5%) patients, who had a euploid loss and a normal ASRM RPL workup, had a pregnancy loss without a probable or definitive cause identified. All other losses were explained by an abnormal 24-chromosome microarray analysis of the miscarriage tissue, an abnormal finding of the RPL workup, or a combination of both. Results from the cost analysis indicated that an initial approach of using a 24-chromosome microarray analysis on miscarriage tissue resulted in a 50% savings in cost to the health care system and to the patient.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This is a single-center study on a small group of well-characterized women with RPL. There was an incomplete follow-up on subsequent pregnancy outcomes after evaluation, however this should not affect our principal results. The maternal age of patients varied from 26 to 45 years old. More aneuploid pregnancy losses would be expected in older women, particularly over the age of 35 years old.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Evaluation of POC using 24-chromosome microarray analysis adds significantly to the ASRM recommended evaluation of RPL. Genetic evaluation on miscarriage tissue obtained at the time of the second and subsequent pregnancy losses should be offered to all couples with two or more consecutive pregnancy losses. The combination of a genetic evaluation on miscarriage tissue with an evidence-based evaluation for RPL will identify a probable or definitive cause in over 90% of miscarriages.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No funding was received for this study and there are no conflicts of interest to declare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Not applicable.

摘要

研究问题

在复发性流产(RPL)患者的流产组织中添加 24 对染色体微阵列分析并结合美国生殖医学协会(ASRM)的复发性流产标准评估,是否能解释大多数流产?

总结答案

当将流产组织的基因检测与 ASRM 标准的复发性流产评估相结合时,超过 90%的复发性妊娠丢失(RPL)患者将确定一个可能或明确的原因。

已知情况

RPL 估计发生在 2-4%的育龄夫妇中。在接受 ASRM 推荐的包括父母染色体异常、先天性和获得性子宫异常、内分泌失衡以及包括抗磷脂综合征在内的自身免疫因素的全面评估后,大约 50%的患者可以确定一个可能的原因。

研究设计、规模、持续时间:这是一项单中心前瞻性队列研究,纳入了 2014 年至 2017 年在一家私人 RPL 诊所就诊的 100 名女性。所有 100 名女性都有两次或更多次妊娠丢失,根据 ASRM 定义进行了完整的 RPL 评估,并在第二次或随后的流产后对流产组织进行了 24 对染色体微阵列分析。

参与者/材料、设置、方法:评估了基于证据的诊断测试的异常结果的频率,这些测试被认为是 RPL 的明确或可能原因(父母染色体异常的核型分析,以及产品的 24 对染色体微阵列分析;子宫异常的经阴道超声检查、子宫输卵管造影或宫腔镜检查;狼疮抗凝剂和抗心磷脂抗体的免疫测试;以及甲状腺刺激激素(TSH)、催乳素和血红蛋白 A1c 的血液测试)。我们排除了流产组织中存在母体细胞污染的情况,或者 ASRM 评估不完整的情况。进行了 RPL 评估的成本分析,以确定在第二次或随后的流产时,先进行 24 对染色体微阵列分析,然后再进行 ASRM RPL 评估的方案是否比先进行 ASRM RPL 评估,然后再进行 24 对染色体微阵列分析的方案更具成本效益(对于那些 24 对染色体微阵列分析正常的 RPL 患者)。

主要结果及其机会的作用

当将流产组织的 24 对染色体微阵列分析与 ASRM 标准的 RPL 评估相结合时,绝大多数(95/100;95%)RPL 患者可以确定流产的明确或可能原因。在所有患者中,只有 45/100(45%)或 45%的 ASRM RPL 评估确定了异常,并对妊娠丢失有一个可能的解释。当最初使用流产组织的 24 对染色体微阵列分析进行测试时,67/100 或 67%的患者确定了明确的异常。只有 5/100(5%)患者,他们有一个正常的 24 对染色体微阵列分析和一个正常的 ASRM RPL 评估,有一个无可能或明确原因的妊娠丢失。所有其他的流产都可以用流产组织的 24 对染色体微阵列分析异常、RPL 评估的异常发现或两者的结合来解释。成本分析的结果表明,在对流产组织进行 24 对染色体微阵列分析的初始方法可使医疗保健系统和患者节省 50%的成本。

局限性、谨慎的原因:这是一项对一组经过良好特征描述的、患有 RPL 的小群体妇女的单中心研究。评估后的后续妊娠结局的随访不完整,但这不应该影响我们的主要结果。患者的母亲年龄从 26 岁到 45 岁不等。年龄较大的女性,特别是 35 岁以上的女性,可能会有更多的染色体非整倍体妊娠丢失。

研究结果的更广泛影响

使用 24 对染色体微阵列分析对流产组织进行评估显著增加了 ASRM 推荐的 RPL 评估。对于两次或更多次连续妊娠丢失的夫妇,应该提供在第二次和随后的妊娠丢失时对流产组织进行基因检测。将流产组织的基因评估与基于证据的 RPL 评估相结合,将在超过 90%的流产中确定一个可能或明确的原因。

研究资金/利益冲突:本研究没有收到任何资金支持,也没有利益冲突需要声明。

试验注册

不适用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验