• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴西一家三级医院中复发性流产夫妇的核型改变发生率。

Prevalence of karyotype alterations in couples with recurrent pregnancy loss in a tertiary center in Brazil.

机构信息

Hospital das Clínicas Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Belo HorizonteMG Brazil Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.

出版信息

Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2024 Jun 27;46. doi: 10.61622/rbgo/2024rbgo51. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.61622/rbgo/2024rbgo51
PMID:38994459
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11239216/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prevalence and type of chromosomal abnormalities in Brazilian couples with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) and compare the clinical characteristics of couples with and without chromosome abnormalities.

METHODS

We assessed the medical records of 127 couples with a history of two or more miscarriages, referred to a tertiary academic hospital in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, from January 2014 to May 2023. Karyotype was generated from peripheral blood lymphocyte cultures, and cytogenetic analysis was performed according to standard protocols by heat-denatured Giemsa (RHG) banding.

RESULTS

Abnormal karyotypes were detected in 10 couples (7.8%). The prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities was higher among females (6.3%) compared to males (2.0%), but this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.192). The mean number of miscarriages was. 3.3 ± 1.1 in couples with chromosome abnormalities and 3.1 ± 1.5 in couples without chromosome abnormalities (p=0.681). Numerical chromosomal anomalies (6 cases) were more frequent than structural anomalies. Four women presented low-grade Turner mosaicism. No differences were found between couples with and without karyotype alterations, except for maternal age, which was higher in the group with chromosome alterations.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of parental chromosomal alterations in our study was higher than in most series described in the literature and was associated with increased maternal age. These findings suggest that karyotyping should be part of the investigation for Brazilian couples with RPL, as identifying the genetic etiology may have implications for subsequent pregnancies.

摘要

目的

评估巴西复发性妊娠丢失(RPL)夫妇中染色体异常的发生率和类型,并比较染色体异常夫妇和无染色体异常夫妇的临床特征。

方法

我们评估了 2014 年 1 月至 2023 年 5 月期间,127 对在巴西贝洛奥里藏特的一所三级学术医院就诊的有两次或两次以上流产史的夫妇的病历。通过外周血淋巴细胞培养产生核型,根据热变性吉姆萨(RHG)带的标准方案进行细胞遗传学分析。

结果

在 10 对夫妇(7.8%)中发现了异常核型。与男性(2.0%)相比,女性(6.3%)的染色体异常发生率更高,但差异无统计学意义(p=0.192)。染色体异常夫妇的平均流产次数为 3.3±1.1,无染色体异常夫妇的平均流产次数为 3.1±1.5(p=0.681)。数值染色体异常(6 例)比结构异常更常见。四名女性表现为低级别特纳嵌合体。除了染色体改变组的母亲年龄较高外,染色体改变组和无染色体改变组之间没有发现差异。

结论

在我们的研究中,父母染色体改变的发生率高于大多数文献中描述的系列,且与母亲年龄增加有关。这些发现表明,对于巴西 RPL 夫妇,核型分析应作为检查的一部分,因为确定遗传病因可能对后续妊娠有影响。

相似文献

1
Prevalence of karyotype alterations in couples with recurrent pregnancy loss in a tertiary center in Brazil.巴西一家三级医院中复发性流产夫妇的核型改变发生率。
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2024 Jun 27;46. doi: 10.61622/rbgo/2024rbgo51. eCollection 2024.
2
Cytogenetic analysis in couples with recurrent miscarriages: a retrospective study from Punjab, north India.复发性流产夫妇的细胞遗传学分析:来自印度北部旁遮普邦的一项回顾性研究。
J Genet. 2016 Dec;95(4):887-894. doi: 10.1007/s12041-016-0713-3.
3
Reproductive outcome and fetal karyotype of couples with recurrent miscarriages.复发性流产夫妇的生殖结局和胎儿核型
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2014;41(3):249-53.
4
Analysis of parental abnormal chromosomal karyotype and subsequent live births in Chinese couples with recurrent pregnancy loss.分析反复妊娠丢失的中国夫妇中父母染色体异常核型与随后的活产儿。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 13;11(1):20298. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98606-4.
5
The type and prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities in couples with recurrent first trimester abortions: A Turkish retrospective study.孕早期反复流产夫妇染色体异常的类型及发生率:一项土耳其的回顾性研究。
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2019 Sep;48(7):521-525. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2019.05.014. Epub 2019 May 11.
6
Chromosomal abnormalities in 163 Tunisian couples with recurrent miscarriages.163对突尼斯反复流产夫妇的染色体异常情况。
Pan Afr Med J. 2017 Sep 29;28:99. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2017.28.99.11879. eCollection 2017.
7
The pattern of chromosomal abnormalities in recurrent miscarriages: a single center retrospective study.复发性流产中染色体异常的模式:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Ann Saudi Med. 2022 Nov-Dec;42(6):385-390. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2022.385. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
8
[Comparison of the etiological constitution of two and three or more recurrent miscarriage].[两次与三次及以上复发性流产病因构成的比较]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Dec 25;53(12):855-859. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2018.12.010.
9
Karyotypes of 1142 couples with recurrent abortion.1142对复发性流产夫妇的核型分析
Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Jul;72(1):31-4.
10
Prevalence and Treatment Choices for Couples with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Due to Structural Chromosomal Anomalies.因结构性染色体异常导致反复流产的夫妇的患病率及治疗选择
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018 Jun;40(6):655-662. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.09.024. Epub 2017 Dec 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors associated with pregnancy outcomes in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss after treatment.治疗后复发性流产患者妊娠结局的相关危险因素。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Dec 19;24(1):827. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-07048-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic review of subsequent pregnancy outcomes in couples with parental abnormal chromosomal karyotypes and recurrent pregnancy loss.夫妇双方染色体核型异常与复发性流产患者再次妊娠结局的系统评价
Fertil Steril. 2022 Nov;118(5):906-914. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.08.008. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
2
Analysis of parental abnormal chromosomal karyotype and subsequent live births in Chinese couples with recurrent pregnancy loss.分析反复妊娠丢失的中国夫妇中父母染色体异常核型与随后的活产儿。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 13;11(1):20298. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98606-4.
3
Chromosomal Aberrations in 224 Couples with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss.224对复发性流产夫妇的染色体畸变
J Hum Reprod Sci. 2020 Oct-Dec;13(4):340-348. doi: 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_11_20. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
4
Recurrent pregnancy losses, a lasting cause of infertility.复发性流产,不孕的持久病因。
Fertil Steril. 2021 Mar;115(3):531-532. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.12.004. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
5
ESHRE guideline: recurrent pregnancy loss.欧洲人类生殖与胚胎学会指南:复发性流产
Hum Reprod Open. 2018 Apr 6;2018(2):hoy004. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoy004. eCollection 2018.
6
Modern management of recurrent miscarriage.复发性流产的现代管理
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Feb;59(1):36-44. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12920. Epub 2018 Nov 4.
7
[X-chromosome loss can be an age-related phenomenon in women].X染色体丢失可能是女性与年龄相关的一种现象。
Ugeskr Laeger. 2018 Jun 4;180(23).
8
Recurrent pregnancy loss evaluation combined with 24-chromosome microarray of miscarriage tissue provides a probable or definite cause of pregnancy loss in over 90% of patients.复发性流产评估结合流产组织 24 染色体微阵列分析,为超过 90%的患者提供了流产的可能或明确病因。
Hum Reprod. 2018 Apr 1;33(4):579-587. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey021.
9
Clinical practice guidelines for the care of girls and women with Turner syndrome: proceedings from the 2016 Cincinnati International Turner Syndrome Meeting.特纳综合征患者护理临床实践指南:2016 年辛辛那提国际特纳综合征会议纪要。
Eur J Endocrinol. 2017 Sep;177(3):G1-G70. doi: 10.1530/EJE-17-0430.
10
Spontaneous fertility and pregnancy outcomes amongst 480 women with Turner syndrome.480 例特纳综合征患者的自发性生育和妊娠结局。
Hum Reprod. 2016 Apr;31(4):782-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew012. Epub 2016 Feb 13.