Suppr超能文献

白细胞介素-27 对结核性胸腔积液和恶性胸腔积液的诊断准确性:一项荟萃分析。

Diagnostic Accuracy of Interleukin-27 between Tuberculous Pleural Effusion and Malignant Pleural Effusion: A Meta-Analysis.

出版信息

Respiration. 2018;95(6):469-477. doi: 10.1159/000486963. Epub 2018 Mar 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The concentration assay of pleural effusion interleukin-27 (IL-27) has raised concern for diagnosing tuberculous pleurisy. Compared with malignant pleural effusion (MPE), the concentration of IL-27 in tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE) increased significantly. Accurate differentiating diagnosis is essential for choosing treatment for pleural effusion.

OBJECTIVE

The present meta-analysis is aimed at determining the accuracy of IL-27 in the differential diagnosis between TPE and MPE.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

After having retrieved the published studies, we combined the sensibility (SEN), specificity (SPE), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of IL-27 in the diagnosis of TPE compared to MPE using a fixed-effect model. The summary receiver operating characteristic curve was applied to estimate the overall test performance.

RESULTS

In total, 550 patients (285 patients with TPE and 265 patients with MPE), included in 7 case-control studies, were enrolled. The summary assessments for IL-27 in the diagnosis between TPE and MPE were: SEN 0.93 (95% CI 0.90-0.96), SPE 0.97 (95% CI 0.94-0.98), PLR 25.88 (95% CI 13.84-48.39), NLR 0.07 (95% CI 0.05-0.11), and DOR 333.26 (95% CI 146.10-760.19), respectively. The maximal joint SEN and SPE was 0.95; the area under the curve was 0.99.

CONCLUSION

IL-27 determination is a relatively accurate test for the diagnosis of TPE, which has very high SEN and SPE for discriminating TPE from MPE. The results of IL-27 assays should be interpreted in parallel with clinical findings and the results of conventional tests.

摘要

背景

胸腔积液白细胞介素-27(IL-27)的浓度检测引起了人们对结核性胸膜炎诊断的关注。与恶性胸腔积液(MPE)相比,结核性胸腔积液(TPE)中 IL-27 的浓度明显增加。准确的鉴别诊断对于选择胸腔积液的治疗至关重要。

目的

本荟萃分析旨在确定 IL-27 在 TPE 和 MPE 鉴别诊断中的准确性。

材料和方法

检索已发表的研究后,我们使用固定效应模型合并了 IL-27 诊断 TPE 与 MPE 的敏感性(SEN)、特异性(SPE)、阳性似然比(PLR)、阴性似然比(NLR)和诊断比值比(DOR)。应用综合受试者工作特征曲线评估总体检验效能。

结果

共纳入 7 项病例对照研究的 550 名患者(285 名 TPE 患者和 265 名 MPE 患者)。IL-27 用于诊断 TPE 和 MPE 的综合评估结果为:SEN 为 0.93(95%CI 0.90-0.96),SPE 为 0.97(95%CI 0.94-0.98),PLR 为 25.88(95%CI 13.84-48.39),NLR 为 0.07(95%CI 0.05-0.11),DOR 为 333.26(95%CI 146.10-760.19)。最大联合 SEN 和 SPE 为 0.95;曲线下面积为 0.99。

结论

IL-27 测定是一种用于诊断 TPE 的相对准确的检测方法,其用于区分 TPE 和 MPE 的 SEN 和 SPE 均较高。IL-27 检测结果应与临床发现和常规检测结果平行解释。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验