Yan Zhi, Wang Hua, Zheng Wen-Qi, Hu Zhi-De
Department of Parasitology, The Basic Medical Sciences College of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot 010050, China.
Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot 010050, China.
J Trop Med. 2022 Mar 20;2022:4348063. doi: 10.1155/2022/4348063. eCollection 2022.
Several studies have assessed the diagnostic accuracy of pleural fluid soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) for tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE) but with varied results. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the accuracy of sIL-2R for TPE.
PubMed, Ovid, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to 23 March 2021 to identify eligible studies concerning the diagnostic accuracy of fluid sIL-2R for TPE. The sensitivity and specificity of sIL-2R for TPE were pooled with a bivariate model. We estimated the global diagnostic accuracy of PE sIL-2R with a summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curve. The revised Quality Assessment for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool (QUADAS-2) was used to assess the quality of eligible studies.
A total of nine studies with 270 TPEs and 586 non-TPEs were included in the final analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.81 (95% CI: 0.76-0.86) and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.77-0.98), respectively. The area under the sROC curve (AUC) was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.79-0.86). No significant publication bias was observed.
Pleural fluid sIL-2R is a useful diagnostic marker for TPE. However, the diagnostic accuracies of already available biomarkers such as pleural fluid adenosine deaminase, interferon-, and interleukin-27 appear to be superior relative to sIL-2R. Therefore, it might not be preferable to use sIL-2R for diagnosing TPE.
多项研究评估了胸腔积液可溶性白细胞介素-2受体(sIL-2R)对结核性胸腔积液(TPE)的诊断准确性,但结果各异。因此,我们进行了这项系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估sIL-2R对TPE的诊断准确性。
检索PubMed、Ovid和Web of Science数据库自建库至2021年3月23日的文献,以确定有关胸腔积液sIL-2R对TPE诊断准确性的合格研究。采用双变量模型汇总sIL-2R对TPE的敏感性和特异性。我们用汇总的受试者工作特征(sROC)曲线估计胸腔积液sIL-2R的总体诊断准确性。使用修订后的诊断准确性研究质量评估工具(QUADAS-2)评估合格研究的质量。
最终分析纳入了9项研究,共270例TPE和586例非TPE。汇总的敏感性和特异性分别为0.81(95%CI:0.76-0.86)和0.92(95%CI:0.77-0.98)。sROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.82(95%CI:0.79-0.86)。未观察到明显的发表偏倚。
胸腔积液sIL-2R是TPE的一种有用诊断标志物。然而,与sIL-2R相比,现有的生物标志物如胸腔积液腺苷脱氨酶、干扰素-和白细胞介素-27的诊断准确性似乎更高。因此,使用sIL-2R诊断TPE可能并非首选。