Ali Sana B, Romero Juana, Morrison Kevin, Hafeez Baria, Ancker Jessica S
Appl Clin Inform. 2018 Jan;9(1):174-184. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1632396. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
Although electronic patient portals are offered by most health care organizations, poor usability and poor fit to patient needs may pose barriers to adoption. We collaborated with an academic hospital to conduct iterative user evaluation of a newly deployed portal designed to deliver inpatient data upon hospital discharge.
Three evaluators applied heuristic usability evaluation and conducted 23 individual user testing sessions with patients with chronic disease or managing the care of family members with chronic disease. Evaluation and development/improvement were conducted iteratively. User testing and analysis of qualitative data were both conducted from the perspective of a task-technology fit framework, to assess the degree of fit between the portal and patient work.
Ability to complete health information management tasks, perceived usability, and positive comments from users improved over the course of the iterative development. However, patients still encountered significant difficulties accomplishing certain tasks such as setting up proxy accounts. The problems were most severe when patients did not start with a clear understanding of tasks that they could accomplish. In exploring the portal, novice users frequently described anecdotes from their own medical history or constructed fictional narratives about a hypothetical patient.
Chronic illness imposes a significant workload on patients, and applying a task-technology framework for evaluation of a patient portal helped improve the portal's fit to patient needs. However, it also revealed that patients often lack a clear understanding of tasks that would help them accomplish personal health information management. Portal developers may need to educate patients about types of patient work involving medical centers, in a way that developers of clinical information systems do not need to do. An approach to doing this might be to provide narratives about hypothetical patients.
尽管大多数医疗保健机构都提供电子患者门户网站,但可用性差以及与患者需求不匹配可能会成为采用的障碍。我们与一家学术医院合作,对一个新部署的旨在在患者出院时提供住院数据的门户网站进行迭代用户评估。
三名评估人员应用启发式可用性评估,并与患有慢性病或管理慢性病家庭成员护理的患者进行了23次个人用户测试。评估与开发/改进是迭代进行的。用户测试和定性数据分析均从任务-技术匹配框架的角度进行,以评估门户网站与患者工作之间的匹配程度。
在迭代开发过程中,完成健康信息管理任务的能力、感知到的可用性以及用户的积极评价都有所提高。然而,患者在完成某些任务(如设置代理账户)时仍遇到重大困难。当患者一开始对自己可以完成的任务没有清晰的认识时,问题最为严重。在探索门户网站时,新手用户经常讲述自己的病史轶事或编造关于假设患者的虚构故事。
慢性病给患者带来了巨大的工作量,应用任务-技术框架评估患者门户网站有助于提高门户网站与患者需求的匹配度。然而,这也表明患者通常对有助于他们完成个人健康信息管理的任务缺乏清晰的认识。门户网站开发者可能需要以临床信息系统开发者无需采用的方式,向患者介绍涉及医疗中心的患者工作类型。一种实现此目的的方法可能是提供关于假设患者的故事。