Ando Kentaro, Nakamura Yuji, Hagiwara-Nagasawa Mihoko, Harada Hiroyuki, Miyamoto Hiroyoshi, Inamura Naoki, Takagi Kan, Goto Ai, Chiba Koki, Lubna Nur Jaharat, Izumi-Nakaseko Hiroko, Naito Atsuhiko T, Sugiyama Atsushi
Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Toho University.
Department of Pharmacology, Toho University Graduate School of Medicine.
J Toxicol Sci. 2018;43(3):183-192. doi: 10.2131/jts.43.183.
In order to better understand the variability of pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles of terfenadine between the previous studies as well as to qualitatively and quantitatively examine the proarrhythmic potential of its major active metabolite fexofenadine in comparison with that of terfenadine, we directly compared their electropharmacological effects with halothane-anesthetized dogs (n = 3). For this purpose, we adopted a cross-over design, which can directly compare the effects of terfenadine and fexofenadine under the identical metabolic condition. Terfenadine in doses of 0.03 and 0.3 mg/kg increased the mean blood pressure, but that of 3 mg/kg decreased it. Terfenadine also increased the heart rate and ventricular contractility in a dose-related manner; but delayed the atrioventricular nodal and intraventricular conductions as well as repolarization suggesting its proarrhythmic potential. Meanwhile, fexofenadine in the same dose increased the mean blood pressure in a dose-related manner without affecting any of the electrophysiological variables in the same animals that proarrhythmic risk of terfenadine was confirmed, indicating its lack of proarrhythmic risk. Peak plasma concentrations for fexofenadine were 3.7, 8.1 and 11.2 times greater than for terfenadine at each matching dose, indicating terfenadine may be metabolized much faster than fexofenadine. Taken together, after the low and middle doses of terfenadine, vasopressor effect of a metabolite fexofenadine could be greater than the depressor effect of parent compound terfenadine, but its reverse would be correct after the high dose. Thus, the cross-over analysis can be an effective way to better understand drug-induced cardiovascular responses.
为了更好地理解特非那定在以往研究中的药效学和药代动力学特征的变异性,以及定性和定量地研究其主要活性代谢物非索非那定与特非那定相比的促心律失常潜力,我们直接比较了它们对氟烷麻醉犬(n = 3)的电药理作用。为此,我们采用了交叉设计,该设计可以在相同的代谢条件下直接比较特非那定和非索非那定的作用。0.03和0.3mg/kg剂量的特非那定可升高平均血压,但3mg/kg剂量的特非那定则使其降低。特非那定还以剂量相关的方式增加心率和心室收缩力;但延迟房室结和心室内传导以及复极化,提示其有促心律失常潜力。同时,相同剂量的非索非那定以剂量相关的方式升高平均血压,而在确认特非那定有促心律失常风险的同一动物中,不影响任何电生理变量,表明其无促心律失常风险。在每个匹配剂量下,非索非那定的血浆峰值浓度比特非那定高3.7、8.1和11.2倍,表明特非那定的代谢可能比非索非那定快得多。综上所述,低、中剂量的特非那定给药后,代谢物非索非那定的升压作用可能大于母体化合物特非那定的降压作用,但高剂量给药后情况则相反。因此,交叉分析可能是更好地理解药物诱导的心血管反应的有效方法。