Huang Li-Ping, Zhou Shi, Ao Ming, Zhao Mei-Ling, Zhang Li-Qin, Cao Long-Jun
Department of Health and Exercise Science, Tianjin University of Sport, Tianjin, China.
School of Health and Human Sciences, Southern Cross University, Lismore, New South Wales, Australia.
J Exerc Sci Fit. 2015 Dec;13(2):86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jesf.2015.07.001. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether unilateral manual needling at nonacupoints could result in bilateral strength gain similar to that found in electroacupuncture at specific acupoints.
Fifty healthy male volunteers with an age range of 19-27 years were recruited and randomly allocated into five groups: (1) manual acupuncture and (2) electroacupuncture at two acupoints (ST-36 and ST-39); (3) manual acupuncture and (4) electroacupuncture at two nonacupoints on the tibialis anterior muscle; and (5) control group. The intervention groups received needling in each session on the right leg for 15 minutes in Week 1, 20 minutes in Week 2, and 30 minutes in Weeks 3-8, three sessions per week. The maximal isometric ankle dorsiflexion strength and muscle activation (as determined by twitch interpolation) of both legs were assessed pre, post, 2 weeks post, and 3 weeks post the experimental period.
Mixed models (linear) with repeated-measures analysis identified significant strength gains ( < 0.01) after the intervention period in both limbs, while no significant differences were detected between the intervention groups and between the two legs, and no change was found in the control group. A significant improvement in muscle activation ( < 0.01) was also observed in both legs in the intervention groups.
It was concluded that both unilateral manual and electric needling caused significant bilateral strength gain, and this effect was not specific to the selected acupoints or electric stimulation. The strength gain was sustained for at least 3 weeks after the 8-week intervention.
背景/目的:本研究旨在确定在非穴位进行单侧手动针刺是否能产生与在特定穴位进行电针治疗相似的双侧力量增强效果。
招募了50名年龄在19至27岁之间的健康男性志愿者,并将他们随机分为五组:(1)手动针刺组;(2)在两个穴位(足三里和上巨虚)进行电针治疗组;(3)在胫骨前肌的两个非穴位进行手动针刺组;(4)在胫骨前肌的两个非穴位进行电针治疗组;(5)对照组。干预组在第1周每次在右腿进行针刺15分钟,第2周20分钟,第3至8周30分钟,每周3次。在实验期前、实验期后、实验期后2周和3周分别评估双腿的最大等长踝关节背屈力量和肌肉激活情况(通过抽搐插值法测定)。
采用重复测量分析的混合模型(线性)显示,干预期后双下肢力量均有显著增加(<0.01),而干预组之间以及双腿之间未检测到显著差异,对照组未发现变化。干预组双腿的肌肉激活情况也有显著改善(<0.01)。
得出的结论是,单侧手动针刺和电针治疗均能引起显著的双侧力量增加,且这种效果并非特定于所选穴位或电刺激。在8周干预后,力量增加至少持续3周。