Böning Georg, Lüdemann Willie M, Chapiro Julius, Jonczyk Martin, Hamm Bernd, Günther Rolf W, Gebauer Bernhard, Streitparth Florian
Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, 330 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018 Jul;41(7):1035-1042. doi: 10.1007/s00270-018-1877-4. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based real-time 3-D guidance of TIPSS placement and its positioning compared to standard guiding methods.
In a prospective, randomized, consecutive study design from 2015 to 2017, we included 21 patients in the CBCT guided group and 15 patients in the ultrasound (US) guided group. The prospective groups were compared in terms of success rate of intervention, portal vein puncture/procedure time, number of puncture attempts and applied dose. We furthermore retrospectively analyzed the last 23 consecutive cases with fluoroscopic guided portal vein puncture in terms of success rate, procedure time and applied dose, as it has been the standard method before US guidance.
The median number of puncture attempts (CBCT: n = 2, US: n = 4, p = 0.249) and the mean puncture time (CBCT: 32 ± 45 min, US: 36 ± 45 min, p = 0.515) were not significantly different. There were furthermore no significant differences in the mean time needed for the total TIPSS procedure (CBCT: 115 ± 52 min, US: 112 ± 41 min, fluoroscopy: 110 ± 33 min, p = 0.996). The mean applied dose of the complete procedure also showed no statistically significant differences (CBCT: 563 ± 289 Gy·cm, US: 322 ± 186 Gy·cm, fluoroscopy: 469 ± 352 Gy·cm, p = 0.069). There were no image guidance related complications.
Real-time 3-D needle guidance based on CBCT is feasible for TIPSS placement. In terms of puncture attempts, duration and dose, CBCT guidance was not inferior to the control groups and may be a valuable support for interventionists in TIPSS procedures.
本研究旨在评估基于锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)的经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPSS)实时三维引导的可行性及其与标准引导方法相比的定位情况。
在2015年至2017年进行的一项前瞻性、随机、连续研究设计中,我们将21例患者纳入CBCT引导组,15例患者纳入超声(US)引导组。对前瞻性组在干预成功率、门静脉穿刺/手术时间、穿刺尝试次数和应用剂量方面进行比较。我们还回顾性分析了过去连续23例经荧光透视引导门静脉穿刺的病例,分析其成功率、手术时间和应用剂量,因为这是超声引导之前的标准方法。
穿刺尝试的中位数(CBCT:n = 2,US:n = 4,p = 0.249)和平均穿刺时间(CBCT:32±45分钟,US:36±45分钟,p = 0.515)无显著差异。此外,TIPSS总手术所需的平均时间也无显著差异(CBCT:115±52分钟,US:112±41分钟,荧光透视:110±33分钟,p = 0.996)。整个手术的平均应用剂量也无统计学显著差异(CBCT:563±289 Gy·cm,US:322±186 Gy·cm,荧光透视:469±352 Gy·cm,p = 0.069)。没有与图像引导相关的并发症。
基于CBCT的实时三维针引导用于TIPSS放置是可行的。在穿刺尝试次数、持续时间和剂量方面,CBCT引导并不逊于对照组,可能是TIPSS手术中对介入医生的一种有价值的支持。