• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证 VitaBit 坐立追踪器:检测坐、立和活动模式。

Validation of the VitaBit Sit-Stand Tracker: Detecting Sitting, Standing, and Activity Patterns.

机构信息

Department of Work and Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Department of Human Biology, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2018 Mar 15;18(3):877. doi: 10.3390/s18030877.

DOI:10.3390/s18030877
PMID:29543766
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5877308/
Abstract

Sedentary behavior (SB) has detrimental consequences and cannot be compensated for through moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (PA). In order to understand and mitigate SB, tools for measuring and monitoring SB are essential. While current direct-to-customer wearables focus on PA, the VitaBit validated in this study was developed to focus on SB. It was tested in a laboratory and in a free-living condition, comparing it to direct observation and to a current best-practice device, the ActiGraph, on a minute-by-minute basis. In the laboratory, the VitaBit yielded specificity and negative predictive rates (NPR) of above 91.2% for sitting and standing, while sensitivity and precision ranged from 74.6% to 85.7%. For walking, all performance values exceeded 97.3%. In the free-living condition, the device revealed performance of over 72.6% for sitting with the ActiGraph as criterion. While sensitivity and precision for standing and walking ranged from 48.2% to 68.7%, specificity and NPR exceeded 83.9%. According to the laboratory findings, high performance for sitting, standing, and walking makes the VitaBit eligible for SB monitoring. As the results are not transferrable to daily life activities, a direct observation study in a free-living setting is recommended.

摘要

久坐行为(SB)会产生有害后果,且无法通过中等到剧烈的身体活动(PA)来弥补。为了理解和减轻 SB,测量和监测 SB 的工具是必不可少的。虽然目前面向消费者的可穿戴设备主要关注 PA,但本研究中验证的 VitaBit 是为专注于 SB 而开发的。它在实验室和自由生活条件下进行了测试,与直接观察和目前的最佳实践设备 ActiGraph 进行了每分钟的比较。在实验室中,VitaBit 在坐姿和站姿方面的特异性和阴性预测率(NPR)均高于 91.2%,而灵敏度和精度范围在 74.6%至 85.7%之间。对于步行,所有性能值均超过 97.3%。在自由生活条件下,该设备显示与 ActiGraph 作为标准相比,坐姿的性能超过 72.6%。虽然站立和行走的灵敏度和精度范围在 48.2%至 68.7%之间,但特异性和 NPR 超过 83.9%。根据实验室的研究结果,VitaBit 在坐姿、站姿和步行方面的高性能使其适合 SB 监测。由于结果不能转移到日常生活活动中,因此建议在自由生活环境中进行直接观察研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7952/5877308/85010a46e163/sensors-18-00877-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7952/5877308/1d3d196a6cd5/sensors-18-00877-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7952/5877308/51faadc99658/sensors-18-00877-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7952/5877308/f4e93616d844/sensors-18-00877-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7952/5877308/ce86e981ae17/sensors-18-00877-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7952/5877308/85010a46e163/sensors-18-00877-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7952/5877308/1d3d196a6cd5/sensors-18-00877-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7952/5877308/51faadc99658/sensors-18-00877-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7952/5877308/f4e93616d844/sensors-18-00877-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7952/5877308/ce86e981ae17/sensors-18-00877-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7952/5877308/85010a46e163/sensors-18-00877-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of the VitaBit Sit-Stand Tracker: Detecting Sitting, Standing, and Activity Patterns.验证 VitaBit 坐立追踪器:检测坐、立和活动模式。
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Mar 15;18(3):877. doi: 10.3390/s18030877.
2
Validity and responsiveness of four measures of occupational sitting and standing.四种职业坐立姿势测量方法的有效性和反应性。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Nov 25;12:144. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0306-1.
3
Assessment of sedentary behaviors and transport-related activities by questionnaire: a validation study.通过问卷调查评估久坐行为和与交通相关的活动:一项验证研究。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 9;16:753. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3412-3.
4
Validation of Accelerometer Thresholds and Inclinometry for Measurement of Sedentary Behavior in Young Adult University Students.加速度计阈值和测斜法在测量青年大学生久坐行为中的验证
Res Nurs Health. 2015 Dec;38(6):492-9. doi: 10.1002/nur.21694. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
5
Reliable recognition of lying, sitting, and standing with a hip-worn accelerometer.使用佩戴在髋部的加速度计可靠地识别躺、坐和站。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018 Mar;28(3):1092-1102. doi: 10.1111/sms.13017. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
6
Is Sitting Always Inactive and Standing Always Active? A Simultaneous Free-Living activPal and ActiGraph Analysis.坐着总是不动,站着总是活跃吗?同时使用 activPal 和 ActiGraph 进行自由生活分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 28;17(23):8864. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238864.
7
Detection of physical activity types using triaxial accelerometers.使用三轴加速度计检测身体活动类型。
J Phys Act Health. 2014 Jan;11(1):76-84. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2011-0347. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
8
Free-living activity counts-derived breaks in sedentary time: Are they real transitions from sitting to standing?基于自由生活活动计数得出的久坐时间中断:它们是从坐姿到站姿的真实转变吗?
Gait Posture. 2015 Jun;42(1):70-2. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.04.008. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
9
Estimating Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in a Free-Living Context: A Pragmatic Comparison of Consumer-Based Activity Trackers and ActiGraph Accelerometry.在自由生活环境中评估身体活动和久坐行为:基于消费者的活动追踪器与ActiGraph加速度计的实用比较
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Sep 7;18(9):e239. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5531.
10
Examining the validity of the ActivPAL monitor in measuring posture and ambulatory movement in children.检查 ActivPAL 监测器在测量儿童姿势和活动方面的有效性。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 Oct 2;9:119. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-119.

引用本文的文献

1
Moderators of the Effectiveness of UPcomplish on Office Workers' Sedentary Behaviour, Quality of Life, and Psychosocial Determinants: A Stepped Wedge Design.UPcomplish 对办公人员久坐行为、生活质量和心理社会决定因素影响的调节作用:一项阶梯式楔形设计。
Int J Behav Med. 2023 Dec;30(6):849-866. doi: 10.1007/s12529-022-10147-w. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
2
Quality Evaluation of Free-living Validation Studies for the Assessment of 24-Hour Physical Behavior in Adults via Wearables: Systematic Review.基于可穿戴设备评估成年人 24 小时身体活动的自由生活验证研究的质量评价:系统评价。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Jun 9;10(6):e36377. doi: 10.2196/36377.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Fitbit Activity Trackers Interrupt Workplace Sedentary Behavior: A New Application.Fitbit活动追踪器可中断工作场所的久坐行为:一种新应用。
Workplace Health Saf. 2018 May;66(5):218-222. doi: 10.1177/2165079917738264. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
2
Developing and Evaluating Digital Interventions to Promote Behavior Change in Health and Health Care: Recommendations Resulting From an International Workshop.开发和评估促进健康与医疗保健行为改变的数字干预措施:国际研讨会的建议
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jun 29;19(6):e232. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7126.
3
Comparison of four Fitbit and Jawbone activity monitors with a research-grade ActiGraph accelerometer for estimating physical activity and energy expenditure.
The Effects of UPcomplish on Office Workers' Sedentary Behaviour, Quality of Life and Psychosocial Determinants: A Stepped-Wedge Design.
UPcomplish 对办公人员久坐行为、生活质量和心理社会决定因素的影响:一项阶梯式设计。
Int J Behav Med. 2022 Dec;29(6):728-742. doi: 10.1007/s12529-022-10054-0. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
4
Tele-Monitoring System for Chronic Diseases Management: Requirements and Architecture.远程慢性病监测系统:需求与架构。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 13;18(14):7459. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147459.
5
Activity Segmentation Using Wearable Sensors for DVT/PE Risk Detection.使用可穿戴传感器进行活动分割以检测深静脉血栓形成/肺栓塞风险
Proc COMPSAC. 2019 Jul;2019:477-483. doi: 10.1109/compsac.2019.10252. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
6
Sedentary Work in Desk-Dominated Environments: A Data-Driven Intervention Using Intervention Mapping.以办公桌为主的环境中的久坐工作:一种使用干预映射的数据驱动干预措施。
JMIR Form Res. 2020 Jul 20;4(7):e14951. doi: 10.2196/14951.
7
Monitoring Occupational Sitting, Standing, and Stepping in Office Employees With the W@W-App and the MetaWearC Sensor: Validation Study.使用 W@W-App 和 MetaWearC 传感器监测办公室员工的职业坐姿、站姿和步姿:验证研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Aug 4;8(8):e15338. doi: 10.2196/15338.
比较四种 Fitbit 和 Jawbone 活动监测器与研究级 ActiGraph 加速度计,以估计身体活动和能量消耗。
Br J Sports Med. 2018 Jul;52(13):844-850. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096990. Epub 2017 May 8.
4
SenseWearMini and Actigraph GT3X Accelerometer Classification of Observed Sedentary and Light-Intensity Physical Activities in a Laboratory Setting.在实验室环境中,SenseWearMini和Actigraph GT3X加速度计对观察到的久坐和低强度身体活动的分类
Physiother Can. 2016;68(2):116-123. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2015-12.
5
Physical Activity Assessment Between Consumer- and Research-Grade Accelerometers: A Comparative Study in Free-Living Conditions.消费者级和研究级加速度计在自由生活条件下的身体活动评估:一项比较研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Sep 19;4(3):e110. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.6281.
6
Estimating Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in a Free-Living Context: A Pragmatic Comparison of Consumer-Based Activity Trackers and ActiGraph Accelerometry.在自由生活环境中评估身体活动和久坐行为:基于消费者的活动追踪器与ActiGraph加速度计的实用比较
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Sep 7;18(9):e239. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5531.
7
Does physical activity attenuate, or even eliminate, the detrimental association of sitting time with mortality? A harmonised meta-analysis of data from more than 1 million men and women.体育活动是否能减弱甚至消除久坐时间与死亡率之间的有害关联?一项针对超过 100 万男性和女性数据的综合荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2016 Sep 24;388(10051):1302-10. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30370-1. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
8
Longitudinal Relationship Between Sitting Time on a Working Day and Vitality, Work Performance, Presenteeism, and Sickness Absence.工作日久坐时间与活力、工作表现、出勤主义及病假缺勤之间的纵向关系。
J Occup Environ Med. 2016 Aug;58(8):784-9. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000809.
9
Accuracy of Posture Allocation Algorithms for Thigh- and Waist-Worn Accelerometers.用于大腿和腰部佩戴式加速度计的姿势分配算法的准确性。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Jun;48(6):1085-90. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000865.
10
Sedentary Behaviour Profiling of Office Workers: A Sensitivity Analysis of Sedentary Cut-Points.办公室职员久坐行为剖析:久坐切点的敏感性分析
Sensors (Basel). 2015 Dec 25;16(1):22. doi: 10.3390/s16010022.