Cardiology Department, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, Queensland, Australia; University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Cardiology Department, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, Queensland, Australia; University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Mar 20;71(11):1246-1254. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.01.024.
Transesophageal echocardiography operators (TEEOP) provide critical imaging support for percutaneous structural cardiac intervention procedures. They stand close to the patient and the associated scattered radiation.
This study sought to investigate TEEOP radiation dose during percutaneous structural cardiac intervention.
Key personnel (TEEOP, anesthetist, primary operator [OP1], and secondary operator) wore instantly downloadable personal dosimeters during procedures requiring TEE support. TEEOP effective dose (E) and E per unit Kerma area product (E/KAP) were calculated. E/KAP was compared with C-arm projections. Additional shielding for TEEOP was implemented, and doses were measured for a further 50 procedures. Multivariate linear regression was performed to investigate independent predictors of radiation dose reduction.
In the initial 98 procedures, median TEEOP E was 2.62 μSv (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.95 to 4.76 μSv), similar to OP1 E: 1.91 μSv (IQR: 0.48 to 3.81 μSv) (p = 0.101), but significantly higher than secondary operator E: 0.48 μSv (IQR: 0.00 to 1.91 μSv) (p < 0.001) and anesthetist E: 0.48 μSv (IQR: 0.00 to 1.43 μSv) (p < 0.001). Procedures using predominantly right anterior oblique (RAO) and steep RAO projections were associated with high TEEOP E/KAP (p = 0.041). In a further 50 procedures, with additional TEEOP shielding, TEEOP E was reduced by 82% (2.62 μSv [IQR: 0.95 to 4.76] to 0.48 μSv [IQR: 0.00 to 1.43 μSv] [p < 0.001]). Multivariate regression demonstrated shielding, procedure type, and KAP as independent predictors of TEEOP dose.
TEE operators are exposed to a radiation dose that is at least as high as that of OP1 during percutaneous cardiac intervention. Doses were higher with procedures using predominantly RAO projections. Radiation doses can be significantly reduced with the use of an additional ceiling-suspended lead shield.
经食管超声心动图操作者(TEEOP)为经皮结构性心脏介入手术提供关键的成像支持。他们站在靠近患者和相关散射辐射的位置。
本研究旨在探讨经皮结构性心脏介入期间 TEEOP 的辐射剂量。
关键人员(TEEOP、麻醉师、主操作医生[OP1]和副操作医生)在需要 TEE 支持的手术中佩戴即时下载的个人剂量计。计算 TEEOP 的有效剂量(E)和每单位比释动能面积乘积的 E 值(E/KAP)。比较了 TEEOP 的 E/KAP 与 C 臂投影。为 TEEOP 实施了额外的屏蔽,并对另外 50 个程序进行了剂量测量。进行了多元线性回归分析,以探讨降低辐射剂量的独立预测因素。
在最初的 98 个程序中,TEEOP 的中位 E 值为 2.62μSv(四分位距[IQR]:0.95 至 4.76μSv),与 OP1 的 E 值相似:1.91μSv(IQR:0.48 至 3.81μSv)(p=0.101),但明显高于副操作医生的 E 值:0.48μSv(IQR:0.00 至 1.91μSv)(p<0.001)和麻醉师的 E 值:0.48μSv(IQR:0.00 至 1.43μSv)(p<0.001)。主要使用右前斜(RAO)和陡峭 RAO 投影的程序与 TEEOP E/KAP 较高相关(p=0.041)。在另外 50 个程序中,通过额外的 TEEOP 屏蔽,TEEOP 的 E 值降低了 82%(2.62μSv[IQR:0.95 至 4.76]至 0.48μSv[IQR:0.00 至 1.43μSv](p<0.001)。多元回归分析表明,屏蔽、手术类型和 KAP 是 TEEOP 剂量的独立预测因素。
TEE 操作者所接受的辐射剂量至少与经皮心脏介入期间的 OP1 操作者相同。主要使用 RAO 投影的程序剂量较高。使用额外的天花板悬挂铅屏蔽可以显著降低辐射剂量。