Department of Orthopaedics, Khon Kaen Hospital, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jul;33(7):2301-2305. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.024. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
Aims of this study included providing a comparison of the measurement of limb-length discrepancy after primary total hip arthroplasty between patient's perception and weight-bearing orthoroentgenographic measurement. A comparison between patient's perception and pelvic radiographic measurement was examined as well.
This prospective study comprised patients who had already undergone total hip arthroplasty and were receiving postoperative outpatient care between April 2017 and July 2017. Block test was used to assess patient's perception on limb-length discrepancy. Weight-bearing orthoroentgenography and pelvic radiography were used for radiographic measurement. These 3 measurements were compared to find the difference, correlation, and reliability.
Evaluations were carried out on 68 patients subsequent to primary total hip arthroplasty. The prevalence of limb-length discrepancy by orthoroentgenographic, patient's perception, and pelvic radiographic measurements was 60%, 57.35%, and 52.94%, respectively. Mean difference of limb-length discrepancy between the 3 measurements were not statistically significant. When compared with orthoroentgenography, sensitivity and specificity of patient's perception measurement were 60.98% and 48.15%, respectively. Likewise, sensitivity and specificity of pelvic radiographic measurement were 78.05% and 85.19%, respectively. Poor correlation and reliability were found between orthoroentgenographic and patient's perception measurement (concordance correlation coefficient = 0.21, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.22). However, good correlation and reliability were found between orthoroentgenographic and pelvic radiographic measurement (concordance correlation coefficient = 0.85, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.85).
Patient's perception on limb-length discrepancy had poor correlation and reliability, low sensitivity and specificity when compared with orthoroentgenographic measurement. A physician should additionally perform measurement by orthoroentgenography or pelvic radiography.
本研究的目的包括提供初次全髋关节置换术后肢体长度差异的测量,比较患者感知与负重正位 X 线片测量之间的差异,并检查患者感知与骨盆 X 线片测量之间的差异。
本前瞻性研究纳入了 2017 年 4 月至 7 月期间接受全髋关节置换术后门诊治疗的患者。采用 BLOCK 试验评估患者对肢体长度差异的感知。负重正位 X 线片和骨盆 X 线片用于影像学测量。对这 3 种测量方法进行比较,以发现差异、相关性和可靠性。
对 68 例初次全髋关节置换术后患者进行了评估。影像学、患者感知和骨盆 X 线片测量的肢体长度差异发生率分别为 60%、57.35%和 52.94%。3 种测量方法之间的肢体长度差异平均值无统计学意义。与正位 X 线片相比,患者感知测量的敏感性和特异性分别为 60.98%和 48.15%。同样,骨盆 X 线片测量的敏感性和特异性分别为 78.05%和 85.19%。正位 X 线片和患者感知测量之间的相关性和可靠性较差(一致性相关系数为 0.21,组内相关系数为 0.22)。然而,正位 X 线片和骨盆 X 线片测量之间的相关性和可靠性较好(一致性相关系数为 0.85,组内相关系数为 0.85)。
与正位 X 线片测量相比,患者对肢体长度差异的感知相关性和可靠性较差,敏感性和特异性较低。医生应额外进行正位 X 线片或骨盆 X 线片测量。