Meyer M Renée Umstattd, Wu Cindy, Walsh Shana M
Department of Health, Human Performance, and Recreation, Robbins College of Health and Human Sciences, Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA.
Department of Management, Hankamer School of Business, Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA.
AIMS Public Health. 2016 Sep 2;3(4):682-701. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2016.4.682. eCollection 2016.
Time spent sitting has been associated with an increased risk of diabetes, cancer, obesity, and mental health impairments. However, 75% of Americans spend most of their days sitting, with work-sitting accounting for 63% of total daily sitting time. Little research examining theory-based antecedents of standing or sitting has been conducted. This lack of solid groundwork makes it difficult to design effective intervention strategies to decrease sitting behaviors. Using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) as our theoretical lens to better understand factors related with beneficial standing behaviors already being practiced, we examined relationships between TPB constructs and time spent standing at work among "positive deviants" (those successful in behavior change). Experience sampling methodology (ESM), 4 times a day (midmorning, before lunch, afternoon, and before leaving work) for 5 consecutive workdays (Monday to Friday), was used to assess employees' standing time. TPB scales assessing attitude (α = 0.81-0.84), norms (α = 0.83), perceived behavioral control (α = 0.77), and intention (α = 0.78) were developed using recommended methods and collected once on the Friday before the ESM surveys started. ESM data are hierarchically nested, therefore we tested our hypotheses using multilevel structural equation modeling with Mplus. Hourly full-time university employees (n = 50; 70.6% female, 84.3% white, mean age = 44 (SD = 11), 88.2% in full-time staff positions) with sedentary occupation types (time at desk while working ≥6 hours/day) participated. A total of 871 daily surveys were completed. Only perceived behavioral control (β = 0.45, < 0.05) was related with work-standing at the event-level (model fit: just fit); mediation through intention was not supported. This is the first study to examine theoretical antecedents of real-time work-standing in a naturalistic field setting among positive deviants. These relationships should be further examined, and behavioral intervention strategies should be guided by information obtained through this positive deviance approach to enhance perceived behavioral control, in addition to implementing environmental changes like installing standing desks.
久坐与患糖尿病、癌症、肥胖症以及心理健康问题的风险增加有关。然而,75%的美国人大部分时间都坐着,其中工作时坐着的时间占每日总坐时的63%。很少有研究探讨基于理论的站立或久坐行为的前因。由于缺乏坚实的基础,很难设计出有效的干预策略来减少久坐行为。我们以计划行为理论(TPB)为理论视角,以便更好地理解与已养成的有益站立行为相关的因素,我们研究了TPB各构成要素与“积极偏差者”(那些在行为改变方面取得成功的人)工作时站立时间之间的关系。采用经验取样法(ESM),在连续5个工作日(周一至周五)每天4次(上午、午餐前、下午和下班前)评估员工的站立时间。TPB量表评估态度(α = 0.81 - 0.84)、规范(α = 0.83)、感知行为控制(α = 0.77)和意向(α = 0.78),采用推荐方法编制,并在ESM调查开始前的周五收集一次。ESM数据是分层嵌套的,因此我们使用Mplus软件通过多层次结构方程模型检验我们的假设。参与研究的是每小时制的全职大学员工(n = 50;女性占70.6%,白人占84.3%,平均年龄 = 44岁(标准差 = 11),88.2%为全职员工岗位),职业类型为久坐型(工作时在办公桌前的时间≥6小时/天)。共完成了871次每日调查。在事件层面,只有感知行为控制(β = 0.45,P < 0.05)与工作时站立有关(模型拟合:勉强拟合);意向的中介作用未得到支持。这是第一项在自然场景中对积极偏差者实时工作站立行为的理论前因进行研究的。这些关系应进一步研究,行为干预策略应以通过这种积极偏差方法获得的信息为指导,以增强感知行为控制,此外还应实施如安装站立式办公桌等环境改变措施。