• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对大学员工样本中工作场所久坐行为的社会认知评估。

A Social Cognitive Assessment of Workplace Sedentary Behavior among a Sample of University Employees.

机构信息

Department of Health Science, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35401, USA.

Center for Research on Interpersonal Violence, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30302, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jul 31;20(15):6476. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20156476.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20156476
PMID:37569017
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10419213/
Abstract

Sedentary behavior (SB) is an important public health concern. Adults working in desk-based occupations spend a considerable proportion of the workday sitting. More information is needed regarding the factors that contribute to occupational SB. The aim of this study was to assess the utility of social cognitive theory (SCT) to explain work-related SB using a quantitative, cross-sectional design by administering an online questionnaire. Participants included 381 full-time employees at a large, public university in the south-central United States. Hierarchical multiple linear regression was used to determine the relationship between SCT constructs and SB. Mean work-related SB was 5.95 (SD = 1.30) h/8 h workday. In model 1, 9.6% of the total variance in SB was accounted for by standing desk ownership and physical activity level ( = 0.001; R2 = 0.096). In model 2, SCT constructs led to a statistically significant R increase of 4.9% ( < 0.001), where standing desk ownership, physical activity, and self-efficacy explained 13.3% of the variance in work-related SB. Findings from this study suggest that self-efficacy may be an important factor in explaining variation in occupational SB. Public health researchers and practitioners should consider strategies to address self-efficacy when developing workplace interventions to target occupational SB.

摘要

久坐行为(SB)是一个重要的公共卫生关注点。从事基于办公桌的职业的成年人在工作日中有相当一部分时间是坐着的。需要更多关于导致职业 SB 的因素的信息。本研究旨在通过使用在线问卷进行定量、横断面设计,评估社会认知理论(SCT)在解释与工作相关的 SB 方面的效用。参与者包括美国中南部一所大型公立大学的 381 名全职员工。分层多元线性回归用于确定 SCT 结构与 SB 之间的关系。平均与工作相关的 SB 为 5.95(SD=1.30)h/8 h 工作日。在模型 1 中,站立式办公桌拥有率和身体活动水平解释了 SB 总方差的 9.6%(=0.001;R2=0.096)。在模型 2 中,SCT 结构导致统计学上显著的 R 增加 4.9%(<0.001),其中站立式办公桌拥有率、身体活动和自我效能感解释了与工作相关的 SB 变异的 13.3%。本研究的结果表明,自我效能感可能是解释职业 SB 变异的一个重要因素。公共卫生研究人员和从业者在制定针对职业 SB 的工作场所干预措施时,应考虑针对自我效能感的策略。

相似文献

1
A Social Cognitive Assessment of Workplace Sedentary Behavior among a Sample of University Employees.对大学员工样本中工作场所久坐行为的社会认知评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jul 31;20(15):6476. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20156476.
2
Ecological Influences on Employees' Workplace Sedentary Behavior: A Cross-Sectional Study.生态因素对员工工作场所久坐行为的影响:一项横断面研究。
Am J Health Promot. 2018 Nov;32(8):1688-1696. doi: 10.1177/0890117118767717. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
3
Effectiveness of workplace interventions with digital elements to reduce sedentary behaviours in office employees: a systematic review and meta-analysis.工作场所中具有数字元素的干预措施对减少办公室员工久坐行为的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Apr 19;21(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01595-6.
4
Assessing and understanding sedentary behaviour in office-based working adults: a mixed-method approach.评估与理解办公室上班族的久坐行为:一种混合方法研究
BMC Public Health. 2016 Apr 27;16:360. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3023-z.
5
Acceptability and feasibility of a low-cost, theory-based and co-produced intervention to reduce workplace sitting time in desk-based university employees.一种低成本、基于理论且共同制定的干预措施对于减少伏案工作的大学员工工作时久坐时间的可接受性和可行性。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Dec 24;15:1294. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2635-z.
6
Understanding and Influencing Occupational Sedentary Behavior: A Mixed-Methods Approach in a Multiethnic Asian Population.理解和影响职业久坐行为:一项在多民族亚洲人群中的混合方法研究。
Health Educ Behav. 2020 Jun;47(3):419-429. doi: 10.1177/1090198119885431. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
7
"Are we working (too) comfortably?": a focus group study to understand sedentary behaviour when working at home and identify intervention strategies.“我们工作(得)太舒服了吗?”:一项理解在家工作时久坐行为并确定干预策略的焦点小组研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 6;24(1):1516. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18892-1.
8
Workplace-Related Factors Associated With Employees' Standing Time at Work: A Research Brief.与员工工作时站立时间相关的工作场所因素:研究简报。
Am J Health Promot. 2019 May;33(4):606-610. doi: 10.1177/0890117118807407. Epub 2018 Oct 28.
9
Workplace health beliefs concerning physical activity and sedentary behaviour.工作场所与身体活动和久坐行为有关的健康信念。
Occup Med (Lond). 2018 Dec 26;68(9):631-634. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqy143.
10
Sitting at work & waist circumference-A cross-sectional study of Australian workers.工作时坐姿与腰围:一项澳大利亚劳动者的横断面研究。
Prev Med. 2020 Dec;141:106243. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106243. Epub 2020 Sep 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Feasibility of Using Mobile Standing Desks to Address Sedentary Behavior in Flexible Work Environments: A Mixed Methods Study.在灵活的工作环境中使用移动站立式办公桌解决久坐行为的可行性:一项混合方法研究。
J Occup Environ Med. 2023 May 1;65(5):e273-e278. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002804. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
2
The Theory of Effort Minimization in Physical Activity.体力活动中的努力最小化理论。
Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2021 Jul 1;49(3):168-178. doi: 10.1249/JES.0000000000000252.
3
Is sitting invisible? Exploring how people mentally represent sitting.坐着是无形的吗?探索人们如何在心理上表现出坐着的状态。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Oct 12;16(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0851-0.
4
Sitting Time, Physical Activity, and Risk of Mortality in Adults.久坐时间、身体活动与成年人的死亡率风险。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Apr 30;73(16):2062-2072. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.02.031.
5
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans.美国人体育活动指南。
JAMA. 2018 Nov 20;320(19):2020-2028. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.14854.
6
Do the associations of sedentary behaviour with cardiovascular disease mortality and cancer mortality differ by physical activity level? A systematic review and harmonised meta-analysis of data from 850 060 participants.久坐行为与心血管疾病死亡率和癌症死亡率的关联是否因身体活动水平而异?来自 850060 名参与者的数据的系统评价和协调荟萃分析。
Br J Sports Med. 2019 Jul;53(14):886-894. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098963. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
7
Common Perceived Barriers and Facilitators for Reducing Sedentary Behaviour among Office Workers.减少上班族久坐行为的常见认知障碍和促进因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 18;15(4):792. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040792.
8
Ecological Influences on Employees' Workplace Sedentary Behavior: A Cross-Sectional Study.生态因素对员工工作场所久坐行为的影响:一项横断面研究。
Am J Health Promot. 2018 Nov;32(8):1688-1696. doi: 10.1177/0890117118767717. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
9
Sedentary behaviour and risk of all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality, and incident type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and dose response meta-analysis.久坐行为与全因、心血管疾病和癌症死亡率以及 2 型糖尿病发病风险的关系:系统评价和剂量反应荟萃分析。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2018 Sep;33(9):811-829. doi: 10.1007/s10654-018-0380-1. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
10
Cognitive and Motivational Factors Associated with Sedentary Behavior: A Systematic Review.与久坐行为相关的认知和动机因素:一项系统综述。
AIMS Public Health. 2016 Nov 28;3(4):956-984. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2016.4.956. eCollection 2016.