Cevik Pinar, Eraslan Oguz, Eser Kursat, Tekeli Suleyman
1 Division of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
2 Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.
Int J Artif Organs. 2018 Mar;41(3):160-167. doi: 10.1177/0391398818756181. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of six different surface conditioning methods on the shear bond strength of ceramic brackets bonded to feldspathic porcelain.
A total of 60 feldspathic porcelain disks were fabricated and divided into six subgroups including 10 specimens in each. Specimens were first treated one of the following surface conditioning methods, namely, 37% phosphoric acid (G-H3PO4), 9.4% hydrofluoric acid (G-HF), grinding with diamond burs (G-Grinding), Nd:YAG laser (G-Nd:YAG), Airborne-particle abrasion (G-Abrasion). Specimens were also coated with silane without surface treatment for comparison (G-Untreated). A total of 60 ceramic brackets were bonded to porcelain surfaces with a composite resin and then subjected to thermocycling 2500× between 5°C and 55°C. The shear bond strength test was carried out using a universal testing device at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Failure types were classified according to the adhesive remnant index. Analysis of variance and Tukey tests were used for statistical analysis (α = 0.05). Microstructure of untreated and surface-treated specimens was investigated by scanning electron microscopy.
Using G-Abrasion specimens resulted in the highest shear bond strength value of 8.58 MPa for feldspathic porcelain. However, the other specimens showed lower values: G-Grinding (6.51 MPa), G-Nd:YAG laser (3.37 MPa), G-HF (2.71 MPa), G-HPO (1.17 MPa), and G-Untreated (0.93 MPa).
Airborne-particle abrasion and grinding can be used as surface treatment techniques on the porcelain surface for a durable bond strength. Hydrofluoric acid and phosphoric acid etching methods were not convenient as surface treatment methods for the feldspathic porcelain.
本研究旨在评估六种不同表面处理方法对粘结在长石质瓷上的陶瓷托槽剪切粘结强度的影响。
共制作60个长石质瓷盘,并将其分为六个亚组,每组10个样本。样本首先采用以下表面处理方法之一进行处理,即37%磷酸(G-H3PO4)、9.4%氢氟酸(G-HF)、用金刚石车针打磨(G-打磨)、Nd:YAG激光(G-Nd:YAG)、空气颗粒研磨(G-研磨)。还制备了未经表面处理但涂有硅烷的样本用于比较(G-未处理)。用复合树脂将60个陶瓷托槽粘结到瓷表面,然后在5°C至55°C之间进行2500次热循环。使用万能测试装置以0.5 mm/min的十字头速度进行剪切粘结强度测试。根据粘结残余指数对失效类型进行分类。采用方差分析和Tukey检验进行统计分析(α = 0.05)。通过扫描电子显微镜研究未处理和表面处理样本的微观结构。
对于长石质瓷,采用G-研磨的样本剪切粘结强度最高,为8.58 MPa。然而,其他样本的值较低:G-打磨(6.51 MPa)、G-Nd:YAG激光(3.37 MPa)、G-HF( 2.71 MPa)、G-HPO(1.17 MPa)和G-未处理(0.93 MPa)。
空气颗粒研磨和打磨可作为瓷表面的表面处理技术以获得持久的粘结强度。氢氟酸和磷酸蚀刻方法作为长石质瓷的表面处理方法不太适用。