Ayad Mohamed F, Fahmy Nadia Z, Rosenstiel Stephen F
Section of Restorative Dentistry, Prosthodontics, and Endodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Tanta, Tanta, Egypt.
J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Feb;99(2):123-30. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60028-1.
Bonding ceramic restorations to tooth structure relies on treatment of the ceramic intaglio surface, selection of a suitable resin luting agent, and appropriate treatment of prepared tooth structure. Various ceramic surface treatments have been advocated which produce different topographies and bond strengths, but little information is available to identify the interaction between the resulting surface topography and bond strength.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of surface treatments on surface roughness and bond strength to dentin and enamel of a commercially available heat-pressed dental ceramic (IPS Empress).
One hundred heat-pressed ceramic disks were fabricated according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Specimens were divided into 5 groups (n=20) and treated with 1 of the following: (1) etching with 9.5% hydrofluoric acid, (2) 50%, or (3) 60% orthophosphoric acid and airborne-particle abrasion with (4) 50-microm, or (5) 250-microm alumina for 10 seconds. Morphological changes obtained with the surface treatments were investigated with a surface texture analyzer on half of the treated specimens. Two additional specimens from each group were treated and prepared for scanning electron microscopy. The specimens were then used for a bond strength test. The treated specimens were silanated and luted with a composite resin luting agent (Nexus 2) to enamel (n=50) and dentin (n=50) surfaces with 10 specimens for each treatment group. The luted specimens were loaded to failure in a universal testing machine in the shear mode with a crosshead speed of 0.05 mm/min. The data were analyzed with 1-way ANOVA followed by the Ryan-Einot-Gabriel-Welsch Multiple Range Test (alpha=.05).
Surface treatments resulted in significant differences for surface topography and shear bond strength (P<.001). Mean surface roughness (Ra) (SD) was (2.54 (0.21) microm) for ceramic surfaces treated with 50-microm aluminum powder. Treatment of ceramic specimens with 50% orthophosphoric acid appeared to result in a smoother surface (1.02 (0.38) microm). The highest mean bond strength (SD) to enamel (14.7 (0.6) MPa) and dentin (8.2 (1.5) MPa) was associated with hydrofluoric acid etching. The lowest mean bond strength (SD) to enamel (2.7 (0.8) MPa) and dentin (1.5 (0.1) MPa) was recorded for 50% phosphoric acid.
Hydrofluoric acid treatment resulted in the generation of pores and grooves that produced the greatest bond strength between the ceramic and tooth dentin and enamel. Orthophosphoric acid treatment was the least effective surface treatment method evaluated. The results are applicable to only the all-ceramic/luting system evaluated.
将陶瓷修复体粘结到牙齿结构上依赖于陶瓷内凹面的处理、合适树脂粘结剂的选择以及对预备牙齿结构的适当处理。已经提倡了各种陶瓷表面处理方法,这些方法会产生不同的表面形貌和粘结强度,但几乎没有信息可用于确定所得表面形貌与粘结强度之间的相互作用。
本体外研究的目的是评估表面处理对市售热压牙科陶瓷(IPS Empress)的表面粗糙度以及与牙本质和牙釉质粘结强度的影响。
根据制造商的建议制作了100个热压陶瓷盘。将标本分为5组(n = 20),并用以下方法之一进行处理:(1)用9.5%氢氟酸蚀刻,(2)50%,或(3)60%正磷酸,以及用(4)50微米,或(5)250微米氧化铝进行空气颗粒喷砂处理10秒。用表面纹理分析仪对一半经处理的标本研究表面处理获得的形态变化。每组另外两个标本进行处理并制备用于扫描电子显微镜检查。然后将标本用于粘结强度测试。将经处理的标本用硅烷化处理并用复合树脂粘结剂(Nexus 2)粘结到牙釉质(n = 50)和牙本质(n = 50)表面,每个处理组有10个标本。将粘结好的标本在万能试验机中以0.05 mm/min的十字头速度在剪切模式下加载至破坏。数据用单因素方差分析,随后进行Ryan-Einot-Gabriel-Welsch多重范围检验(α = 0.05)进行分析。
表面处理导致表面形貌和剪切粘结强度有显著差异(P <.001)。用50微米铝粉处理的陶瓷表面的平均表面粗糙度(Ra)(标准差)为(2.54(0.21)微米)。用50%正磷酸处理陶瓷标本似乎会产生更光滑的表面(1.02(0.38)微米)。与氢氟酸蚀刻相关的对牙釉质(14.7(0.6)MPa)和牙本质(8.2(1.5)MPa)的最高平均粘结强度(标准差)。对牙釉质(2.7(0.8)MPa)和牙本质(1.5(0.1)MPa)的最低平均粘结强度(标准差)记录为50%磷酸处理。
氢氟酸处理导致产生孔隙和凹槽,从而在陶瓷与牙齿牙本质和牙釉质之间产生最大的粘结强度。正磷酸处理是所评估的最无效的表面处理方法。这些结果仅适用于所评估的全陶瓷/粘结系统。