• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实验室规模评估充气掩埋概念在处理和紧急处置传染性动物尸体方面的应用。

Lab-scale evaluation of aerated burial concept for treatment and emergency disposal of infectious animal carcasses.

机构信息

Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA; Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA; Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Iowa State University, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.

Department of Animal Biosystems Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Waste Manag. 2018 Jun;76:715-726. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 Mar 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2018.03.009
PMID:29548829
Abstract

Nearly 55,000 outbreaks of animal disease were reported to the World Animal Health Information Database between 2005 and 2016. To suppress the spread of disease, large numbers of animal mortalities often must be disposed of quickly and are frequently buried on the farm where they were raised. While this method of emergency disposal is fast and relatively inexpensive, it also can have undesirable and lasting impacts (slow decay, concerns about groundwater contamination, pathogens re-emergence, and odor). Following the 2010 foot-and-mouth disease outbreak, the Republic of Korea's National Institute of Animal Science funded research on selected burial alternatives or modifications believed to have potential to reduce undesirable impacts of burial. One such modification involves the injection of air into the liquid degradation products from the 60-70% water from decomposing carcasses in lined burial trenches. Prior to prototype development in the field, a laboratory-scale study of aerated decomposition (AeD) of poultry carcasses was conducted to quantify improvements in time of carcass decomposition, reduction of potential groundwater pollutants in the liquid products of decomposition (since trench liners may ultimately leak), and reduction of odorous VOCs emitted during decomposition. Headspace gases also were monitored to determine the potential for using gaseous biomarkers in the aerated burial trench exhaust stream to monitor completion of the decomposition. Results of the lab-scale experiments show that the mass of chicken carcasses was reduced by 95.0 ± 0.9% within 3 months at mesophilic temperatures (vs. negligible reduction via mesophilic anaerobic digestion typical of trench burial) with concomitant reduction of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD; 99%), volatile suspended solids (VSS; 99%), total suspended solids (TSS; 99%), and total ammonia nitrogen (TAN; 98%) in the liquid digestate. At week #7 BOD and TSS in digestate met the U.S. EPA standards for treated wastewater discharge to surface water. Salmonella and Staphylococcus were inactivated by the AeD process after week #1 and #3, respectively. Five gaseous biomarkers: pyrimidine; p-cresol; phenol; dimethyl disulfide; and dimethyl trisulfide; were identified and correlated with digestate quality. Phenol was the best predictor of TAN (R = 0.96), BOD (R = 0.92), and dissolved oxygen (DO) (R = -0.91). Phenol was also the best predictor populations of Salmonella (R = 0.95) and aerobes (R = 0.88). P-cresol was the best predictor for anaerobes (R = 0.88). The off-gas from AeD will require biofiltration or other odor control measures for a much shorter time than anaerobic decomposition. The lab-scale studies indicate that AeD burial has the potential to make burial a faster, safer, and more environmentally friendly method for emergency disposal and treatment of infectious animal carcasses and that this method should be further developed via prototype-scale field studies.

摘要

2005 年至 2016 年间,世界动物卫生组织向世界动物卫生信息数据库报告了近 55000 起动物疾病暴发。为了抑制疾病的传播,大量动物死亡通常必须迅速处理,并且经常被埋在其饲养的农场。虽然这种紧急处理方法快速且相对便宜,但它也会产生不良且持久的影响(缓慢腐烂、担心地下水污染、病原体再次出现和气味)。2010 年口蹄疫爆发后,韩国国家动物科学研究所资助了对选定的埋葬替代物或改良物的研究,这些改良物被认为有可能减少埋葬的不良影响。一种这样的改良方法涉及向 lined 埋葬沟中分解尸体的 60-70%水的液体降解产物中注入空气。在现场原型开发之前,对家禽尸体的充气分解(AeD)进行了实验室规模的研究,以量化尸体分解时间的改善、分解液体产物中潜在的地下水污染物的减少(因为沟槽衬里最终可能会泄漏)以及在分解过程中减少有臭味的 VOC 排放。还监测了顶空气体,以确定在充气掩埋沟排气中使用气态生物标志物来监测分解完成的可能性。实验室规模实验的结果表明,在中温条件下(与典型沟槽掩埋的中温厌氧消化相比,几乎没有减少),鸡尸体的质量在 3 个月内减少了 95.0%±0.9%,同时生物需氧量(BOD;99%)、挥发性悬浮固体(VSS;99%)、总悬浮固体(TSS;99%)和总氨氮(TAN;98%)在液体消化物中减少。在第 7 周,消化物中的 BOD 和 TSS 达到了美国环保署规定的地表水处理废水排放标准。沙门氏菌和葡萄球菌在 AeD 处理后分别在第 1 周和第 3 周失活。鉴定并关联了五种气态生物标志物:嘧啶;对甲酚;苯酚;二甲基二硫;和二甲基三硫。苯酚是 TAN(R=0.96)、BOD(R=0.92)和溶解氧(DO)(R=-0.91)的最佳预测因子。苯酚也是沙门氏菌(R=0.95)和需氧菌(R=0.88)种群的最佳预测因子。对甲酚是厌氧菌(R=0.88)的最佳预测因子。AeD 的废气需要生物过滤或其他气味控制措施,时间比厌氧分解短得多。实验室研究表明,AeD 埋葬有可能使埋葬成为一种更快、更安全、更环保的紧急处理和治疗传染性动物尸体的方法,并且应该通过原型规模的现场研究进一步开发这种方法。

相似文献

1
Lab-scale evaluation of aerated burial concept for treatment and emergency disposal of infectious animal carcasses.实验室规模评估充气掩埋概念在处理和紧急处置传染性动物尸体方面的应用。
Waste Manag. 2018 Jun;76:715-726. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
2
Data evidencing slow anaerobic digestion in emergency treatment and disposal of infectious animal carcasses.有数据表明在传染性动物尸体的应急处理中厌氧消化过程缓慢。
Data Brief. 2018 Dec 6;22:227-233. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.12.001. eCollection 2019 Feb.
3
Biosecurity procedures for the environmental management of carcasses burial sites in Korea.韩国尸体埋葬地环境管理的生物安全程序。
Environ Geochem Health. 2016 Dec;38(6):1229-1240. doi: 10.1007/s10653-015-9786-9. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
4
Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.上流式厌氧污泥床反应器——综述
Indian J Environ Health. 2001 Apr;43(2):1-82.
5
Efficacy of NH3 as a secondary barrier treatment for inactivation of Salmonella Typhimurium and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in digestate of animal carcasses: Proof-of-concept.氨气作为动物尸体消化物中鼠伤寒沙门氏菌和耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌灭活动的二级屏障处理方法的效果:概念验证
PLoS One. 2017 May 5;12(5):e0176825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176825. eCollection 2017.
6
Nationwide groundwater monitoring around infectious-disease-caused livestock mortality burials in Korea: Superimposed influence of animal leachate on pre-existing anthropogenic pollution.韩国传染病引起的牲畜死亡埋葬点周边地下水监测:动物渗滤液对既有人为污染的叠加影响。
Environ Int. 2019 Aug;129:376-388. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.04.073. Epub 2019 May 28.
7
Potential water quality impacts originating from land burial of cattle carcasses.来自牛尸体土地掩埋的潜在水质影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2013 Jul 1;456-457:246-53. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.03.083. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
8
Methane and carbon dioxide production from simulated anaerobic degradation of cattle carcasses.模拟牛尸体厌氧降解过程中甲烷和二氧化碳的产生。
Waste Manag. 2012 May;32(5):939-43. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.11.015. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
9
Characterization of odor emissions and microbial community structure during degradation of pig carcasses using the soil burial-composting method.采用土壤掩埋堆肥法对猪尸体降解过程中的气味排放和微生物群落结构进行表征。
Waste Manag. 2018 Jul;77:30-42. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.04.043. Epub 2018 May 8.
10
Performance of a plastic-wrapped composting system for biosecure emergency disposal of disease-related swine mortalities.用于对与疾病相关的病死猪进行生物安全应急处理的塑料包装堆肥系统的性能。
Waste Manag. 2016 Feb;48:483-491. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.11.006. Epub 2015 Nov 21.

引用本文的文献

1
A review of the animal disease outbreaks and biosecure animal mortality composting systems.动物疾病暴发与生物安全动物死亡堆肥系统综述。
Waste Manag. 2019 May 1;90:121-131. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.04.047. Epub 2019 Apr 28.
2
Data evidencing slow anaerobic digestion in emergency treatment and disposal of infectious animal carcasses.有数据表明在传染性动物尸体的应急处理中厌氧消化过程缓慢。
Data Brief. 2018 Dec 6;22:227-233. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.12.001. eCollection 2019 Feb.
3
Efficacy of NH3 as a secondary barrier treatment for inactivation of Salmonella Typhimurium and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in digestate of animal carcasses: Proof-of-concept.
氨气作为动物尸体消化物中鼠伤寒沙门氏菌和耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌灭活动的二级屏障处理方法的效果:概念验证
PLoS One. 2017 May 5;12(5):e0176825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176825. eCollection 2017.