Fitzsimons P, Shorvon P, Frost R A, Stevenson G W
Can Assoc Radiol J. 1987 Jun;38(2):109-12.
A randomized prospective trial was performed comparing Golytely (with bisacodyl) with our standard two-day catharsis and bowel washout regimen as colon preparation for double-contrast barium enema examinations. Of the 107 patients who participated, 50 received the standard preparation and 57 Golytely. Two radiologists reviewed the enema films without knowledge of which preparation had been used. No significant difference was detected either in the number of failed preparations or in the quality. We conclude that routine use of Golytely is preferable to methods involving catharsis and standard tap water enemas for barium enema examination, on the grounds that it is equally effective, yet more convenient for patients and for the radiology department, and reduces total costs.
进行了一项随机前瞻性试验，比较了复方聚乙二醇电解质散（含比沙可啶）与我们标准的两日导泻和肠道冲洗方案作为双重对比钡灌肠检查的结肠准备方法。在参与的107例患者中，50例接受标准准备，57例接受复方聚乙二醇电解质散准备。两名放射科医生在不知道使用了哪种准备方法的情况下查看灌肠片。在准备失败的数量或质量方面均未检测到显著差异。我们得出结论，对于钡灌肠检查，常规使用复方聚乙二醇电解质散优于涉及导泻和标准自来水灌肠的方法，因为它同样有效，但对患者和放射科更方便，且降低了总成本。
