• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparison of two oral evacuants (Citromag and Golytely) for bowel preparation before barium enema.

作者信息

Chan C C, Loke T K, Chan J C, Lo S S

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, United Christian Hospital, Kwun Tong, Kowloon, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Br J Radiol. 1997 Oct;70(838):1000-3. doi: 10.1259/bjr.70.838.9404202.

DOI:10.1259/bjr.70.838.9404202
PMID:9404202
Abstract

Oral regimens for bowel preparation before barium enema examination are routinely used because of their convenience and simplicity, rather than the traditional method of colonic wash-out. We performed a prospective study comparing the side-effects and efficacy of two commonly used oral bowel evacuants (Citromag and Golytely) for bowel preparation before barium enema examination in 102 patients. The side-effects associated with the agents were assessed by analysing a questionnaire completed by the patients. There was no significant difference in the side-effects between the two agents although more patients taking Golytely (45.5%) deemed its taste unacceptable than those taking Citromag (25.9%). The results of the bowel preparation were assessed by two independent radiologists giving scores on the amount of faecal residue and the quality of mucosal coating. The amount of faecal residue was less in the Golytely group (p < 0.05). The quality of mucosal coating by barium was also better in the Golytely group than the Citromag group (p < 0.05).

摘要

相似文献

1
Comparison of two oral evacuants (Citromag and Golytely) for bowel preparation before barium enema.
Br J Radiol. 1997 Oct;70(838):1000-3. doi: 10.1259/bjr.70.838.9404202.
2
A blinded clinical trial comparing conventional cleansing enema, Pico-salax and Golytely for barium enema bowel preparation.一项比较传统清洁灌肠剂、聚乙二醇电解质散和复方聚乙二醇电解质散用于钡剂灌肠肠道准备的双盲临床试验。
Clin Radiol. 1996 Aug;51(8):566-9. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(96)80137-1.
3
Comparison of a new colon lavage solution (Golytely-RSS) with a standard preparation for air-contrast barium enema.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988 Nov;151(5):947-50. doi: 10.2214/ajr.151.5.947.
4
A comparison of Golytely and standard preparation for barium enema.聚乙二醇电解质散与钡灌肠标准准备方法的比较。
Can Assoc Radiol J. 1987 Jun;38(2):109-12.
5
Comparison of Golytely lavage with standard diet/cathartic preparation for double-contrast barium enema.聚乙二醇电解质散灌肠与标准饮食/缓泻剂准备用于双重对比钡灌肠的比较。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1984 Jun;142(6):1147-9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.142.6.1147.
6
A prospective blinded randomized trial comparing oral sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol solutions for bowel preparation prior to barium enema.
Clin Radiol. 1997 Oct;52(10):791-3. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(97)80162-6.
7
A randomized blinded clinical trial of a rapid colonic lavage solution (Golytely) compared with standard preparation for colonoscopy and barium enema.一项关于快速结肠灌洗溶液(聚乙二醇电解质散)与结肠镜检查和钡灌肠标准准备方法对比的随机双盲临床试验。
Gastroenterology. 1983 Jun;84(6):1512-16.
8
Randomized single-blind clinical trial of a rapid colonic lavage solution (Golytely) vs. standard preparation for barium enema and colonoscopy.
Gastrointest Radiol. 1985;10(4):378-82. doi: 10.1007/BF01893135.
9
A comparative trial of magnesium citrate (Citramag) and Picolax for barium enema bowel preparation.
Clin Radiol. 1994 Jun;49(6):379-81. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(05)81821-5.
10
A rapid colonic lavage solution (Golytely) vs standard preparation for barium enema and colonoscopy.快速结肠灌洗溶液(聚乙二醇电解质散)与钡剂灌肠和结肠镜检查的标准准备方法的比较
Gastrointest Radiol. 1986;11(4):375-6.