Suppr超能文献

评估终末期肾病中心力衰竭的指南导向药物治疗。

Assessing Guideline-Directed Medication Therapy for Heart Failure in End-Stage Renal Disease.

机构信息

The University of Alabama at Birmingham Medical Center, Birmingham, AL.

Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Translational Science, The University of Tennessee College of Pharmacy, Memphis, TN.

出版信息

Am J Med Sci. 2018 Mar;355(3):247-251. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2017.11.008. Epub 2017 Nov 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) requires guideline-directed medication therapy (GDMT) consisting of either an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or an angiotensin receptor blocker in combination with an indicated beta-blocker. There is concern that end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients are not being prescribed GDMT. The study aim was to determine whether outcomes differ for patients with HFrEF and ESRD receiving GDMT compared to those not receiving GDMT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adult patients with ESRD and HFrEF admitted to a tertiary teaching hospital over a 2-year period were included. Patients were categorized into GDMT or non-GDMT groups based on their home medications. The length of stay (LOS), mortality, and 30-day hospital readmissions were compared between groups. The incidence of hyperkalemia, hypotension and bradycardia were also evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 109 patients were included: 88% African-American, 61% males, median age 63 (28-93) years with 25 in the GDMT group and 84 in the non-GDMT group. The LOS did not differ between the GDMT (5 days; 3-14) compared to the non-GDMT group (7 days; 3-28), P = 0.14. Thirty-day hospital readmission and in-hospital mortality were also similar. Hypotension occurred less frequently in the GDMT group compared to the non-GDMT group, 4% versus 27% (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Although there were no differences in the primary outcomes, the shorter LOS in the GDMT group may be clinically significant. The fact that most patients with ESRD and HFrEF were not receiving GDMT is a finding that requires further evaluation.

摘要

背景

射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)的治疗需要指南指导的药物治疗(GDMT),包括血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂与指示的β受体阻滞剂联合使用。有人担心终末期肾病(ESRD)患者未开具 GDMT。本研究旨在确定接受 GDMT 的 HFrEF 和 ESRD 患者与未接受 GDMT 的患者相比,其结局是否存在差异。

材料和方法

纳入了在 2 年内入住一家三级教学医院的 ESRD 和 HFrEF 成年患者。根据家庭用药情况,将患者分为 GDMT 或非 GDMT 组。比较两组之间的住院时间(LOS)、死亡率和 30 天住院再入院率。还评估了高钾血症、低血压和心动过缓的发生率。

结果

共纳入 109 例患者:88%为非裔美国人,61%为男性,中位年龄 63(28-93)岁,GDMT 组 25 例,非 GDMT 组 84 例。GDMT 组(5 天;3-14)与非 GDMT 组(7 天;3-28)的 LOS 无差异,P=0.14。30 天住院再入院率和院内死亡率也相似。GDMT 组低血压的发生率低于非 GDMT 组,分别为 4%和 27%(P=0.01)。

结论

尽管主要结局没有差异,但 GDMT 组较短的 LOS 可能具有临床意义。大多数 ESRD 和 HFrEF 患者未接受 GDMT 是一个需要进一步评估的发现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验