Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Heart, Vascular and Neuro Theme, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Eur J Heart Fail. 2024 Jun;26(6):1408-1418. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.3214. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
Recent guidelines recommend four core drug classes (renin-angiotensin system inhibitor/angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor [RASi/ARNi], beta-blocker, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist [MRA], and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor [SGLT2i]) for the pharmacological management of heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We assessed physicians' perceived (i) comfort with implementing the recent HFrEF guideline recommendations; (ii) status of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) implementation; (iii) use of different GDMT sequencing strategies; and (iv) barriers and strategies for achieving implementation.
A 26-question survey was disseminated via bulletin, e-mail and social channels directed to physicians with an interest in HF. Of 432 respondents representing 91 countries, 36% were female, 52% were aged <50 years, and 90% mainly practiced in cardiology (30% HF). Overall comfort with implementing quadruple therapy was high (87%). Only 12% estimated that >90% of patients with HFrEF without contraindications received quadruple therapy. The time required to initiate quadruple therapy was estimated at 1-2 weeks by 34% of respondents, 1 month by 36%, 3 months by 24%, and ≥6 months by 6%. The average respondent favoured traditional drug sequencing strategies (RASi/ARNi with/followed by beta-blocker, and then MRA with/followed by SGLT2i) over simultaneous initiation or SGLT2i-first sequences. The most frequently perceived clinical barriers to implementation were hypotension (70%), creatinine increase (47%), hyperkalaemia (45%) and patient adherence (42%).
Although comfort with implementing all four core drug classes in patients with HFrEF was high among physicians, a majority estimated implementation of GDMT in HFrEF to be low. We identified several important perceived clinical and non-clinical barriers that can be targeted to improve implementation.
最近的指南建议将四类核心药物(肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂/血管紧张素受体-脑啡肽酶抑制剂[RASi/ARNi]、β受体阻滞剂、盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂[MRA]和钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂[SGLT2i])用于治疗射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者。我们评估了医生对以下方面的看法:(i)实施最近的 HFrEF 指南建议的舒适度;(ii)指南指导的药物治疗(GDMT)实施情况;(iii)不同 GDMT 排序策略的使用情况;以及(iv)实现实施的障碍和策略。
通过公告、电子邮件和社交媒体向对心力衰竭感兴趣的医生分发了一份包含 26 个问题的调查问卷。在 432 名回复者中,36%为女性,52%年龄<50 岁,90%主要从事心脏病学(30%为心力衰竭)。整体而言,实施四联疗法的舒适度较高(87%)。只有 12%的医生估计,没有禁忌症的 HFrEF 患者中,有>90%的患者接受了四联疗法。34%的受访者估计,开始四联疗法需要 1-2 周的时间,36%的受访者估计需要 1 个月,24%的受访者估计需要 3 个月,6%的受访者估计需要>6 个月。平均受访者赞成传统的药物排序策略(RASi/ARNi 与/后用β受体阻滞剂,然后 MRA 与/后用 SGLT2i),而不是同时开始或 SGLT2i 优先排序。实施过程中最常被认为的临床障碍是低血压(70%)、肌酐升高(47%)、高钾血症(45%)和患者依从性(42%)。
尽管医生对在 HFrEF 患者中使用所有四类核心药物的实施感到舒适,但大多数医生估计 HFrEF 的 GDMT 实施率较低。我们确定了一些重要的、可被识别的临床和非临床障碍,可针对这些障碍进行干预,以提高实施率。