Suppr超能文献

医师对射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者实施指南指导的药物治疗的看法、态度和策略。一项对 ESC 心力衰竭协会和 ESC 心脏病学实践理事会的调查。

Physician perceptions, attitudes, and strategies towards implementing guideline-directed medical therapy in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. A survey of the Heart Failure Association of the ESC and the ESC Council for Cardiology Practice.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Heart, Vascular and Neuro Theme, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Eur J Heart Fail. 2024 Jun;26(6):1408-1418. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.3214. Epub 2024 Mar 22.

Abstract

AIMS

Recent guidelines recommend four core drug classes (renin-angiotensin system inhibitor/angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor [RASi/ARNi], beta-blocker, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist [MRA], and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor [SGLT2i]) for the pharmacological management of heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We assessed physicians' perceived (i) comfort with implementing the recent HFrEF guideline recommendations; (ii) status of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) implementation; (iii) use of different GDMT sequencing strategies; and (iv) barriers and strategies for achieving implementation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A 26-question survey was disseminated via bulletin, e-mail and social channels directed to physicians with an interest in HF. Of 432 respondents representing 91 countries, 36% were female, 52% were aged <50 years, and 90% mainly practiced in cardiology (30% HF). Overall comfort with implementing quadruple therapy was high (87%). Only 12% estimated that >90% of patients with HFrEF without contraindications received quadruple therapy. The time required to initiate quadruple therapy was estimated at 1-2 weeks by 34% of respondents, 1 month by 36%, 3 months by 24%, and ≥6 months by 6%. The average respondent favoured traditional drug sequencing strategies (RASi/ARNi with/followed by beta-blocker, and then MRA with/followed by SGLT2i) over simultaneous initiation or SGLT2i-first sequences. The most frequently perceived clinical barriers to implementation were hypotension (70%), creatinine increase (47%), hyperkalaemia (45%) and patient adherence (42%).

CONCLUSIONS

Although comfort with implementing all four core drug classes in patients with HFrEF was high among physicians, a majority estimated implementation of GDMT in HFrEF to be low. We identified several important perceived clinical and non-clinical barriers that can be targeted to improve implementation.

摘要

目的

最近的指南建议将四类核心药物(肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂/血管紧张素受体-脑啡肽酶抑制剂[RASi/ARNi]、β受体阻滞剂、盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂[MRA]和钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂[SGLT2i])用于治疗射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者。我们评估了医生对以下方面的看法:(i)实施最近的 HFrEF 指南建议的舒适度;(ii)指南指导的药物治疗(GDMT)实施情况;(iii)不同 GDMT 排序策略的使用情况;以及(iv)实现实施的障碍和策略。

方法和结果

通过公告、电子邮件和社交媒体向对心力衰竭感兴趣的医生分发了一份包含 26 个问题的调查问卷。在 432 名回复者中,36%为女性,52%年龄<50 岁,90%主要从事心脏病学(30%为心力衰竭)。整体而言,实施四联疗法的舒适度较高(87%)。只有 12%的医生估计,没有禁忌症的 HFrEF 患者中,有>90%的患者接受了四联疗法。34%的受访者估计,开始四联疗法需要 1-2 周的时间,36%的受访者估计需要 1 个月,24%的受访者估计需要 3 个月,6%的受访者估计需要>6 个月。平均受访者赞成传统的药物排序策略(RASi/ARNi 与/后用β受体阻滞剂,然后 MRA 与/后用 SGLT2i),而不是同时开始或 SGLT2i 优先排序。实施过程中最常被认为的临床障碍是低血压(70%)、肌酐升高(47%)、高钾血症(45%)和患者依从性(42%)。

结论

尽管医生对在 HFrEF 患者中使用所有四类核心药物的实施感到舒适,但大多数医生估计 HFrEF 的 GDMT 实施率较低。我们确定了一些重要的、可被识别的临床和非临床障碍,可针对这些障碍进行干预,以提高实施率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验