Guwatudde David, Absetz Pilvikki, Delobelle Peter, Östenson Claes-Göran, Olmen Van Josefien, Alvesson Helle Molsted, Mayega Roy William, Ekirapa Kiracho Elizabeth, Kiguli Juliet, Sundberg Carl Johan, Sanders David, Tomson Göran, Puoane Thandi, Peterson Stefan, Daivadanam Meena
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
Collaborative Care Systems Finland, Helsinki, Finland.
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 17;8(3):e019981. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019981.
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is increasingly contributing to the global burden of disease. Health systems in most parts of the world are struggling to diagnose and manage T2D, especially in low-income and middle-income countries, and among disadvantaged populations in high-income countries. The aim of this study is to determine the added benefit of community interventions onto health facility interventions, towards glycaemic control among persons with diabetes, and towards reduction in plasma glucose among persons with prediabetes.
An adaptive implementation cluster randomised trial is being implemented in two rural districts in Uganda with three clusters per study arm, in an urban township in South Africa with one cluster per study arm, and in socially disadvantaged suburbs in Stockholm, Sweden with one cluster per study arm. Clusters are communities within the catchment areas of participating primary healthcare facilities. There are two study arms comprising a facility plus community interventions arm and a facility-only interventions arm. Uganda has a third arm comprising usual care. Intervention strategies focus on organisation of care, linkage between health facility and the community, and strengthening patient role in self-management, community mobilisation and a supportive environment. Among T2D participants, the primary outcome is controlled plasma glucose; whereas among prediabetes participants the primary outcome is reduction in plasma glucose.
The study has received approval in Uganda from the Higher Degrees, Research and Ethics Committee of Makerere University School of Public Health and from the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology; in South Africa from the Biomedical Science Research Ethics Committee of the University of the Western Cape; and in Sweden from the Regional Ethical Board in Stockholm. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and scientific meetings.
ISRCTN11913581; Pre-results.
2型糖尿病(T2D)对全球疾病负担的影响日益增大。世界上大多数地区的卫生系统都在努力诊断和管理T2D,尤其是在低收入和中等收入国家,以及高收入国家的弱势群体中。本研究的目的是确定社区干预对卫生机构干预的附加益处,以实现糖尿病患者的血糖控制,以及糖尿病前期患者血浆葡萄糖的降低。
在乌干达的两个农村地区开展一项适应性实施整群随机试验,每个研究组有三个整群;在南非的一个城市镇区开展,每个研究组有一个整群;在瑞典斯德哥尔摩社会处境不利的郊区开展,每个研究组有一个整群。整群是参与的初级卫生保健机构服务区域内的社区。有两个研究组,一个是机构加社区干预组,另一个是仅机构干预组。乌干达还有第三个组,即常规护理组。干预策略侧重于护理组织、卫生机构与社区之间的联系,以及加强患者在自我管理、社区动员和支持性环境中的作用。在T2D参与者中,主要结局是血糖得到控制;而在糖尿病前期参与者中,主要结局是血浆葡萄糖降低。
该研究已获得乌干达马凯雷雷大学公共卫生学院高等学位、研究与伦理委员会以及乌干达国家科学技术委员会的批准;在南非获得西开普大学生物医学科学研究伦理委员会的批准;在瑞典获得斯德哥尔摩地区伦理委员会的批准。研究结果将通过同行评审的出版物和科学会议进行传播。
ISRCTN11913581;预结果。