• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在不同环境中生长的饲用植物营养价值的全球比较。

A global comparison of the nutritive values of forage plants grown in contrasting environments.

作者信息

Lee Mark A

机构信息

Natural Capital and Plant Health, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, Richmond, TW9 3AB, UK.

出版信息

J Plant Res. 2018 Jul;131(4):641-654. doi: 10.1007/s10265-018-1024-y. Epub 2018 Mar 17.

DOI:10.1007/s10265-018-1024-y
PMID:29550895
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6015622/
Abstract

Forage plants are valuable because they maintain wild and domesticated herbivores, and sustain the delivery of meat, milk and other commodities. Forage plants contain different quantities of fibre, lignin, minerals and protein, and vary in the proportion of their tissue that can be digested by herbivores. These nutritive components are important determinants of consumer growth rates, reproductive success and behaviour. A dataset was compiled to quantify variation in forage plant nutritive values within- and between-plant species, and to assess variation between plant functional groups and bioclimatic zones. 1255 geo-located records containing 3774 measurements of nutritive values for 136 forage plant species grown in 30 countries were obtained from published articles. Spatial variability in forage nutritive values indicated that climate modified plant nutritive values. Forage plants grown in arid and equatorial regions generally contained less digestible material than those grown in temperate and tundra regions; containing more fibre and lignin, and less protein. These patterns may reveal why herbivore body sizes, digestion and migration strategies are different in warmer and drier regions. This dataset also revealed the capacity for variation in the nutrition provided by forage plants, which may drive consumer species coexistence. The proportion of the plant tissue that was digestible ranged between species from 2 to 91%. The amount of fibre contained within plant material ranged by 23-90%, protein by 2-36%, lignin by 1-21% and minerals by 2-22%. On average, grasses and tree foliage contained the most fibre, whilst herbaceous legumes contained the most protein and tree foliage contained the most lignin. However, there were individual species within each functional group that were highly nutritious. This dataset may be used to identify forage plant species or mixtures of species from different functional groups with useful nutritional traits which can be cultivated to enhance livestock productivity and inform wild herbivore conservation strategies.

摘要

饲用植物很有价值,因为它们维持着野生和家养食草动物的生存,并保障了肉类、奶类及其他商品的供应。饲用植物含有不同数量的纤维、木质素、矿物质和蛋白质,其可被食草动物消化的组织比例也各不相同。这些营养成分是决定消费者生长速度、繁殖成功率和行为的重要因素。我们汇编了一个数据集,以量化植物物种内部和之间饲用植物营养价值的差异,并评估植物功能组和生物气候带之间的差异。我们从已发表的文章中获取了1255条地理位置记录,这些记录包含了30个国家种植的136种饲用植物的3774个营养价值测量数据。饲用植物营养价值的空间变异性表明气候改变了植物的营养价值。生长在干旱和赤道地区的饲用植物通常比生长在温带和苔原地区的植物含有更少的可消化物质;含有更多的纤维和木质素,以及更少的蛋白质。这些模式可能揭示了为什么在温暖和干燥地区食草动物的体型、消化和迁徙策略会有所不同。这个数据集还揭示了饲用植物提供的营养存在差异的可能性,这可能推动消费者物种的共存。不同物种间可消化的植物组织比例在2%至91%之间。植物材料中所含纤维量的范围为23%至90%,蛋白质为2%至36%,木质素为1%至21%,矿物质为2%至22%。平均而言,禾本科植物和树叶含纤维最多,而草本豆科植物含蛋白质最多,树叶含木质素最多。然而每个功能组中都有个别物种营养丰富。这个数据集可用于识别具有有益营养特性的饲用植物物种或来自不同功能组的物种混合物,这些物种可以种植以提高牲畜生产力,并为野生食草动物保护策略提供参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3e9/6015622/b04f97bdd807/10265_2018_1024_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3e9/6015622/559e56b65b49/10265_2018_1024_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3e9/6015622/face093258c8/10265_2018_1024_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3e9/6015622/a201a92c0642/10265_2018_1024_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3e9/6015622/b04f97bdd807/10265_2018_1024_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3e9/6015622/559e56b65b49/10265_2018_1024_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3e9/6015622/face093258c8/10265_2018_1024_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3e9/6015622/a201a92c0642/10265_2018_1024_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3e9/6015622/b04f97bdd807/10265_2018_1024_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A global comparison of the nutritive values of forage plants grown in contrasting environments.在不同环境中生长的饲用植物营养价值的全球比较。
J Plant Res. 2018 Jul;131(4):641-654. doi: 10.1007/s10265-018-1024-y. Epub 2018 Mar 17.
2
Comparison of Nutritive Values of Tropical Pasture Species Grown in Different Environments, and Implications for Livestock Methane Production: A Meta-Analysis.不同环境下生长的热带牧草品种营养价值比较及其对家畜甲烷排放的影响:一项荟萃分析
Animals (Basel). 2022 Jul 14;12(14):1806. doi: 10.3390/ani12141806.
3
Spatio-temporal patterns of rangeland forage nutritive value and grazer selection with patch-burning in the US northern Great Plains.美国大平原北部斑块火烧法下草地饲用植物营养价值和食草动物选择性的时空格局。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Apr;357:120731. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120731. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
4
Nutritional composition and in vitro digestibility of grass and legume winter (cover) crops.冬季(覆盖)草料和豆科作物的营养成分和体外消化率。
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Mar;101(3):2037-2047. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13260. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
5
Nutritive value of three tropical forage legumes and their influence on growth performance, carcass traits and organ weights of pigs.三种热带豆科牧草的营养价值及其对猪生长性能、胴体性状和器官重量的影响。
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2016 Aug;48(6):1165-73. doi: 10.1007/s11250-016-1070-1. Epub 2016 May 6.
6
Changes in southern Piedmont grassland community structure and nutritive quality with future climate scenarios of elevated tropospheric ozone and altered rainfall patterns.随着对流层臭氧浓度升高和降雨模式改变的未来气候情景,皮埃蒙特南部草原群落结构和营养品质的变化。
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2016 Jan;18 Suppl 1:47-55. doi: 10.1111/plb.12324. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
7
Effect of concentrate supplement to ewes on nutritive value of ingested Caatinga native forage nutritive value as affected by season.浓缩物补充对绵羊的影响对摄入的卡廷加原生牧草营养价值的影响,受季节影响。
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2021 Dec 2;53(6):556. doi: 10.1007/s11250-021-03004-7.
8
Combining near infrared spectra of feces and geostatistics to generate forage nutritional quality maps across landscapes.结合粪便的近红外光谱和地统计学方法生成跨景观的饲料营养质量图。
Ecol Appl. 2015 Sep;25(6):1630-9. doi: 10.1890/14-1347.1.
9
Alfalfa forage digestibility, quality and yield under future climate change scenarios vary with Sinorhizobium meliloti strain.紫花苜蓿饲料的消化率、质量和产量在未来气候变化情景下因根瘤菌属苜蓿中华根瘤菌菌株的不同而有所差异。
J Plant Physiol. 2012 May 15;169(8):782-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2012.01.010. Epub 2012 Feb 25.
10
Genetic variations of cell wall digestibility related traits in floral stems of Arabidopsis thaliana accessions as a basis for the improvement of the feeding value in maize and forage plants.拟南芥株系花茎中细胞壁消化率相关性状的遗传变异,作为提高玉米和饲料作物饲用价值的基础。
Theor Appl Genet. 2006 Jun;113(1):163-75. doi: 10.1007/s00122-006-0284-4. Epub 2006 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of forage production performance and prediction of introduction adaptability for different germplasms in the southeast edge of the Qinghai-Tibet plateau.青藏高原东南缘不同种质牧草生产性能评价及引种适应性预测
Front Plant Sci. 2025 Aug 13;16:1564278. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1564278. eCollection 2025.
2
Extending beyond traditional forage: potential nutritional benefits of native plants in extreme arid insular regions.超越传统饲料:极端干旱岛屿地区本土植物的潜在营养益处
Front Plant Sci. 2024 Dec 24;15:1476809. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1476809. eCollection 2024.
3
Production, use and nutritive value of fruit wastes as feed in and around the city of West Arsi Zone and Sidama Regional State.

本文引用的文献

1
Modelling the nutritional ecology of ungulate herbivores: evolution of body size and competitive interactions.有蹄类食草动物营养生态学建模:体型进化与竞争相互作用
Oecologia. 1992 Mar;89(3):428-434. doi: 10.1007/BF00317422.
2
Physiological and structural tradeoffs underlying the leaf economics spectrum.叶经济谱背后的生理和结构权衡。
New Phytol. 2017 Jun;214(4):1447-1463. doi: 10.1111/nph.14496. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
3
Herbaceous Legume Encroachment Reduces Grass Productivity and Density in Arid Rangelands.草本豆科植物的入侵降低了干旱草原的草产量和密度。
西阿西地区和锡达马地区州及周边城市水果废弃物作为饲料的生产、利用及营养价值
Heliyon. 2024 Oct 15;10(23):e39429. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39429. eCollection 2024 Dec 15.
4
Assessing the proximate compositions of indigenous forage species in Yemen's pastoral rangelands.评估也门牧区草原上本土饲料物种的近似成分。
Open Life Sci. 2024 Nov 11;19(1):20220901. doi: 10.1515/biol-2022-0901. eCollection 2024.
5
Effects of grazing on grassland or wood-pasture, slaughtering age and ageing time on meat production and quality in Podolian young bulls.放牧对草原或林牧地的影响、屠宰年龄和陈化时间对波多利年轻公牛产肉性能和肉质的影响。
Vet Q. 2024 Dec;44(1):1-12. doi: 10.1080/01652176.2024.2381544. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
6
Adult Feeding Experience Determines the Fecundity and Preference of the (F.) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae).成虫取食经历决定了(瓢虫属)瓢虫(鞘翅目:瓢虫科)的繁殖力和偏好。
Biology (Basel). 2024 Apr 9;13(4):250. doi: 10.3390/biology13040250.
7
Unlocking growth potential: Synergistic potassium fertilization for enhanced yield, nutrient uptake, and energy fractions in Chinese cabbage.释放生长潜力:协同施用钾肥提高大白菜产量、养分吸收及能量组分
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 26;10(7):e28765. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28765. eCollection 2024 Apr 15.
8
Using sulfur stable isotope ratios (δ S) for animal geolocation: Estimating the delay mechanisms between diet ingestion and isotope incorporation in tail hair.利用硫稳定同位素比值(δ S)进行动物定位:估计饮食摄入和尾毛中同位素掺入之间的延迟机制。
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2024 Jan 30;38(2):e9674. doi: 10.1002/rcm.9674.
9
Chemical Composition and In Vitro Ruminal Fermentation Characteristics of Native Grasses from the Floodplain Lowlands Ecosystem in the Colombian Orinoquia.哥伦比亚奥里诺科河平原低地生态系统中本地草类的化学成分及体外瘤胃发酵特性
Animals (Basel). 2023 Aug 30;13(17):2760. doi: 10.3390/ani13172760.
10
Nutritional quality of indigenous legume browse in southern Ethiopia: farmers' preference and correlation of local valuation of feed value with scientific indicators.埃塞俄比亚南部本土豆科植物嫩枝叶的营养品质:农民偏好及饲料价值的当地评估与科学指标的相关性
Front Vet Sci. 2023 Aug 21;10:1198212. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1198212. eCollection 2023.
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 17;11(11):e0166743. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166743. eCollection 2016.
4
Linking landscape-scale differences in forage to ungulate nutritional ecology.将草料在景观尺度上的差异与有蹄类动物的营养生态学联系起来。
Ecol Appl. 2016 Oct;26(7):2156-2174. doi: 10.1002/eap.1370. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
5
Physiological and biochemical responses of the forage legume Trifolium alexandrinum to different saline conditions and nitrogen levels.饲用豆科植物埃及三叶草对不同盐分条件和氮水平的生理生化响应。
J Plant Res. 2016 May;129(3):423-34. doi: 10.1007/s10265-016-0791-6. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
6
Functional traits in agriculture: agrobiodiversity and ecosystem services.农业中的功能特性:农业生物多样性和生态系统服务。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2015 Sep;30(9):531-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2015.06.013. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
7
DNA metabarcoding illuminates dietary niche partitioning by African large herbivores.DNA宏条形码技术揭示了非洲大型食草动物在饮食生态位上的分化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jun 30;112(26):8019-24. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1503283112. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
8
Climate variation explains a third of global crop yield variability.气候变化解释了全球作物产量变异性的三分之一。
Nat Commun. 2015 Jan 22;6:5989. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6989.
9
Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health.全球饮食与环境可持续性和人类健康息息相关。
Nature. 2014 Nov 27;515(7528):518-22. doi: 10.1038/nature13959. Epub 2014 Nov 12.
10
Plant and arthropod community sensitivity to rainfall manipulation but not nitrogen enrichment in a successional grassland ecosystem.在一个演替的草原生态系统中,植物和节肢动物群落对降雨操纵敏感,但对氮富集不敏感。
Oecologia. 2014 Dec;176(4):1173-85. doi: 10.1007/s00442-014-3077-5. Epub 2014 Sep 16.