Former Visiting Professor, Division of Restorative Sciences and Prosthodontics, The Ohio State University College of Dentistry, Columbus, Ohio; and Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Okan University Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul, Turkey.
Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Istanbul Aydin University Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul, Turkey.
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Aug;120(2):263-268. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.10.024. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
The effects of surface treatments and coffee thermocycling on the color and relative translucency of a recently introduced computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) monolithic glass-ceramic are unknown.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of coffee thermocycling on the color and relative translucency parameter (RTP) of CAD-CAM monolithic glass-ceramics after different surface treatments.
Specimens (1.5-mm-thick) were sectioned from zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramic (ZLS) (n=18) and lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (LDS) blocks (n=18). Two different types of surface treatments (glazing or polishing) were applied to the specimens. The specimens were subjected to 5000 thermocycles in a coffee solution. The color coordinates of specimens were measured before and after coffee thermocycling by using a spectroradiometer, and color differences and relative translucency values were calculated by using CIEDE2000 color difference and RTP formulas. ANOVA was used to analyze the color difference and relative translucency values by using maximum likelihood estimation and the Satterthwaite degrees of freedom methods. Any significant interaction between surface subgroups was further analyzed by using the Tukey-Kramer adjustment (α=.05).
Material type had a significant effect on color difference (P=.018). All color difference values of all materials were smaller than the clinical acceptability threshold (<1.8 units). For relative translucency, material (P<.001) and coffee thermocycling had a significant effect (P=.014), and an interaction was found between the surface treatments and materials (P<.001). The Tukey-Kramer test revealed significant differences between glazed and polished subgroups of LDS material, except for ZLS-glazed and ZLS-polished subgroups.
Different surface treatments of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate and lithium disilicate glass-ceramics resulted in clinically acceptable color changes after coffee thermocycling. The color changes in all groups, except for LDS-polished, were not perceivable. Lithium disilicate was more translucent than zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate before and after coffee thermocycling. Coffee thermocycling decreased the translucency of both of the materials. Different surface treatments affected the translucency of only lithium disilicate for tested thickness.
目前尚不清楚表面处理和咖啡热循环对最近引入的计算机辅助设计和计算机辅助制造(CAD-CAM)整体玻璃陶瓷的颜色和相对透光率的影响。
本体外研究的目的是评估不同表面处理后咖啡热循环对 CAD-CAM 整体玻璃陶瓷颜色和相对透光率参数(RTP)的影响。
从氧化锆增强锂硅玻璃陶瓷(ZLS)(n=18)和锂二硅玻璃陶瓷(LDS)块中切下 1.5 毫米厚的试件(n=18)。对试件进行两种不同类型的表面处理(上釉或抛光)。将试件在咖啡溶液中进行 5000 次热循环。使用分光光度计在咖啡热循环前后测量试件的颜色坐标,并使用 CIEDE2000 颜色差和 RTP 公式计算颜色差和相对透光率值。使用最大似然估计和 Satterthwaite 自由度方法,通过方差分析对颜色差和相对透光率值进行分析。任何表面亚组之间的显著相互作用都通过 Tukey-Kramer 调整(α=.05)进一步分析。
材料类型对颜色差有显著影响(P=.018)。所有材料的所有颜色差均小于临床可接受阈值(<1.8 单位)。对于相对透光率,材料(P<.001)和咖啡热循环有显著影响(P=.014),并且在表面处理和材料之间发现了相互作用(P<.001)。Tukey-Kramer 检验显示 LDS 材料的上釉和抛光亚组之间存在显著差异,除了 ZLS 上釉和 ZLS 抛光亚组之外。
CAD-CAM 整体氧化锆增强锂硅和锂二硅玻璃陶瓷经过不同的表面处理后,在咖啡热循环后会产生临床可接受的颜色变化。除了 LDS 抛光组外,所有组的颜色变化都无法察觉。锂二硅在咖啡热循环前后比氧化锆增强锂硅更透明。咖啡热循环降低了两种材料的透光率。不同的表面处理仅影响测试厚度的锂二硅的透光率。