Agres Alison N, Gehlen Tobias J, Arampatzis Adamantios, Taylor William R, Duda Georg N, Manegold Sebastian
Julius Wolff Institute, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
Gait Posture. 2018 May;62:179-185. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.03.007. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
Although early functional rehabilitation (EFR) has been suggested to yield rapid functional recovery after Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) compared to conventional rehabilitation (CR), most quantitative assessments occur long after rehabilitation has been completed. Few data exist regarding the short-term functional gains during the healing period post-ATR. It remains unclear if EFR allows for an objectively faster return to function. The aim of this study was to examine EFR's effect on gait, plantarflexor strength, and tendon properties in early post-operative follow-ups.
Fourteen patients received either EFR (n = 6) or CR (n = 8) after percutaneous ATR repair. Functional gait analysis, maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVICs), and Achilles tendon properties were assessed at 8 and 12 weeks post-op.
Comparison of EFR against CR yielded no statistically significant differences in ankle kinematics or kinetics, Achilles tendon properties or MVICs on the injured (INJ) ankle at either time point. During gait, only CR patients demonstrated significantly lower plantarflexion moments on INJ at 8 weeks (0.817 ± 0.151 N·m/kg vs. 1.172 ± 0.177 N·m/kg, p = 0.002). All patients exhibited deficits in plantarflexor moment at 8 weeks and eversion moment at 12 weeks on INJ during gait that had effect sizes of note when compared to CON.
ATR patients, regardless of rehabilitation, exhibit deficits in gait, AT properties, and single-limb strength at 8 weeks. Though AT properties and single-limb plantarflexor isometric strength remain at a deficit at 12 weeks, bipedal plantarflexion moments are comparable between INJ and CON. Though effect size calculations suggested clinically significant differences, clear benefits of EFR compared to CR were not found.
尽管与传统康复(CR)相比,早期功能康复(EFR)被认为能使跟腱断裂(ATR)后功能快速恢复,但大多数定量评估在康复完成后很长时间才进行。关于ATR后愈合期的短期功能改善的数据很少。目前尚不清楚EFR是否能使功能恢复得更快。本研究的目的是在术后早期随访中检查EFR对步态、跖屈肌力量和肌腱特性的影响。
14例患者在经皮ATR修复后接受了EFR(n = 6)或CR(n = 8)。在术后8周和12周评估功能步态分析、最大自主等长收缩(MVIC)和跟腱特性。
在两个时间点,EFR与CR相比,患侧(INJ)踝关节的运动学或动力学、跟腱特性或MVIC均无统计学显著差异。在步态中,只有CR组患者在8周时患侧的跖屈力矩显著较低(0.817±0.151N·m/kg vs. 1.172±0.177N·m/kg,p = 0.002)。与健侧(CON)相比,所有患者在步态中患侧在8周时跖屈力矩和12周时外翻力矩均有不足,效应量显著。
ATR患者无论接受何种康复治疗,在8周时均存在步态、跟腱特性和单腿力量方面的不足。尽管12周时跟腱特性和单腿跖屈等长力量仍有不足,但患侧和健侧的双足跖屈力矩相当。尽管效应量计算表明存在临床显著差异,但未发现EFR与CR相比有明显优势。