Suppr超能文献

用于中度牙科镇静的咪达唑仑/芬太尼给药医嘱

Administration order of midazolam/fentanyl for moderate dental sedation.

作者信息

Lobb Douglas, Clarke Alix, Lai Hollis

机构信息

Department of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

出版信息

J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Feb;18(1):47-56. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2018.18.1.47. Epub 2018 Feb 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of administration order when a sedative drug (midazolam) and an opioid analgesic drug (fentanyl) is applied for moderate intravenous (IV) sedation in dentistry.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted in one dental clinic during its transition from a midazolam-first to a fentanyl-first protocol for dental procedures requiring moderate IV sedation. Physiological parameters, drug administration times, patient recovery times, drug dosages, and patient recall and satisfaction were investigated for differences.

RESULTS

A total of 76 charts (40 midazolam-first and 36 fentanyl-first administrations), were used in the analysis. Administering midazolam first resulted in an average 4.38 min (52%) decrease in administration times (P < 0.001), and a decrease in procedural recollection immediately following the procedure (P = 0.03), and 24 to 48 hours later (P = 0.009). Administering fentanyl first required an average of 2.43 mg (29%) less midazolam (P < 0.001). No significant differences were found for change in vital signs, minimum oxygen saturation levels, recovery times, and patient satisfaction (P > 0.05). Oxygen saturation levels did not drop below 90% for either group; however, 5 cases in the fentanyl-first group fell to between 90% and 92%, compared with 0 cases in the midazolam-first group.

CONCLUSIONS

The administration order of fentanyl and midazolam may have different effects on patients and the sedation procedure. Findings from this study should be used to facilitate discussion among dental practitioners and to guide additional research investigating this topic.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨在牙科中应用镇静药物(咪达唑仑)和阿片类镇痛药物(芬太尼)进行中度静脉镇静时给药顺序的影响。

方法

在一家牙科诊所进行了一项回顾性病历审查,该诊所正从咪达唑仑优先方案过渡到芬太尼优先方案,用于需要中度静脉镇静的牙科手术。研究了生理参数、给药时间、患者恢复时间、药物剂量以及患者的回忆和满意度的差异。

结果

分析共使用了76份病历(40例咪达唑仑优先给药和36例芬太尼优先给药)。先给予咪达唑仑使给药时间平均减少4.38分钟(52%)(P<0.001),并使手术后立即(P=0.03)以及24至48小时后(P=0.009)的手术回忆减少。先给予芬太尼平均所需的咪达唑仑减少2.43毫克(29%)(P<0.001)。在生命体征变化、最低氧饱和度水平、恢复时间和患者满意度方面未发现显著差异(P>0.05)。两组的氧饱和度水平均未降至90%以下;然而,芬太尼优先组有5例降至90%至92%之间,而咪达唑仑优先组为0例。

结论

芬太尼和咪达唑仑的给药顺序可能对患者和镇静过程有不同影响。本研究结果应用于促进牙科从业者之间的讨论,并指导对该主题的进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验