Mamula Petar, Markowitz Jonathan E, Neiswender Kristin, Zimmerman Ann, Wood Stephanie, Garofolo Michael, Nieberle Megan, Trautwein Andria, Lombardi Susan, Sargent-Harkins Lynn, Lachewitz Greta, Farace Lisa, Morgan Verita, Puma Anita, Cook-Sather Scott D, Liacouras Chris A
Division of GI and Nutrition, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Feb;65(2):203-10. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.05.002.
Data on safety of intravenous sedation in pediatric GI endoscopy are sparse.
To evaluate safety of intravenous sedation for GI endoscopy.
DESIGN/SETTING: Single-center prospective series of outpatient GI endoscopies performed from February 2003 to February 2004 at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. The recorded information included demographic, medication, and adverse event data.
A total of 1226 patients were studied.
Description of adverse events relating to intravenous sedation.
A total of 2635 endoscopies were performed, of which 1717 were outpatient procedures with the patient under intravenous sedation. Sedation data were available on 1578 procedures (92%, M/F 674/552): 758 esophagogastroduodenoscopies (EGD) alone, 116 colonoscopies (COL) alone, and 352 combined EGD and COL. The median dose of fentanyl was 2.77 microg/kg (SD 0.97, range 0-6.73), and of midazolam was 0.11 mg/kg (SD 0.06, range 0-0.39). The mean recovery time was 118 minutes (SD 47.3, range 31-375). Ten patients (0.8%) failed intravenous sedation. Serious adverse events (apnea) were noted in 2 patients (0.2%). Mild or moderate adverse events included desaturation below 92% for less than 20 seconds (100 patients, 9%), vomiting (64 patients, 5%), agitation (15 patients, 1%), desaturation below 92% for greater than 20 seconds (12 patients, 0.7%), and rash (8 patients, 0.7%). No cardiopulmonary resuscitation or sedation reversal was necessary. No patients required hospitalization. Patients younger than 6 years were more likely to develop respiratory adverse event (P < .01).
Intravenous sedation with midazolam and fentanyl is safe for pediatric GI endoscopy. Serious adverse events are rare and no patient required hospitalization.
儿科胃肠内镜检查中静脉镇静安全性的数据较少。
评估胃肠内镜检查静脉镇静的安全性。
设计/场所:2003年2月至2004年2月在费城儿童医院进行的单中心门诊胃肠内镜检查前瞻性系列研究。记录的信息包括人口统计学、用药及不良事件数据。
共研究了1226例患者。
描述与静脉镇静相关的不良事件。
共进行了2635例内镜检查,其中1717例为门诊手术,患者接受静脉镇静。1578例手术(92%,男/女674/552)有镇静数据:单独食管胃十二指肠镜检查(EGD)758例,单独结肠镜检查(COL)116例,EGD和COL联合检查352例。芬太尼的中位剂量为2.77μg/kg(标准差0.97,范围0 - 6.73),咪达唑仑的中位剂量为0.11mg/kg(标准差0.06,范围0 - 0.39)。平均恢复时间为118分钟(标准差47.3,范围31 - 375)。10例患者(0.8%)静脉镇静失败。2例患者(0.2%)出现严重不良事件(呼吸暂停)。轻度或中度不良事件包括血氧饱和度低于92%持续不到20秒(100例患者,9%)、呕吐(64例患者,5%)、躁动(15例患者,1%)、血氧饱和度低于92%持续超过20秒(12例患者,0.7%)和皮疹(8例患者,0.7%)。无需进行心肺复苏或使用镇静逆转药物。无患者需要住院治疗。6岁以下患者更易发生呼吸不良事件(P <.01)。
咪达唑仑和芬太尼静脉镇静用于儿科胃肠内镜检查是安全的。严重不良事件罕见,无患者需要住院治疗。