Kovačević Mirza, Rizvanović Nermina, Adilović Adisa Šabanović, Smajić Jasmina, Sijerčić Selma
Department of Anesthesiology, Resusciation and Intensive Care, Cantonal Hospital Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Clinic for Anesthesiology and Reanimatology, University Clinical Centre Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Saudi J Anaesth. 2022 Oct-Dec;16(4):423-429. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_488_22. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
The aim of the study was to compare the analgesic effects of ketamine over fentanyl combined with propofol in analgesia-based elective colonoscopy with purpose of patient safety and satisfaction.
This is a double-blinded prospective randomized controlled trial. Ninety patients were included and randomized to either fentanyl-propofol (Group FP, : 30), ketamine-propofol (Group KP, : 30) or propofol-control group (Group C, : 30). Group FP patients received fentanyl and propofol, Group KP received ketamine and propofol and Group C, propofol. In all groups, incremental doses of propofol were used to maintain a Ramsay sedation score (RSS) of 5. Respiratory depression and hemodynamic parameters were monitored for the first minute and every 5 min during endoscopy. Fifteen minutes after the procedure, the degree of pain was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS), the quality of recovery according to the Aldrete score (ARS), complications during and after the procedure and additional doses of propofol were recorded.
Mean arterial pressure (MAP) at 5 and 30 min ( < 0.05), heart rate (HR) at 15, 25 and 30 min ( < 0.05) and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO) at 30 min ( < 0.05) were statistically significant for Group FP. Desaturation (* = 0.033), and weakness (* = 0.004) was also significant for Group FP at 20, 25 and 30 min ( < 0.05). Pain was lower assessed for the Group KP according to the VAS (** = 0.025).
In analgesia-based colonoscopy, ketamine provides appropriate analgesia and less incidence of complications compared to fentanyl.
本研究旨在比较氯胺酮与芬太尼联合丙泊酚在以镇痛为基础的择期结肠镜检查中的镇痛效果,以确保患者安全并提高满意度。
这是一项双盲前瞻性随机对照试验。纳入90例患者,随机分为芬太尼-丙泊酚组(FP组,n = 30)、氯胺酮-丙泊酚组(KP组,n = 30)或丙泊酚对照组(C组,n = 30)。FP组患者接受芬太尼和丙泊酚,KP组接受氯胺酮和丙泊酚,C组仅接受丙泊酚。所有组均使用递增剂量的丙泊酚维持 Ramsay 镇静评分(RSS)为5分。在内镜检查期间,第1分钟及之后每5分钟监测呼吸抑制和血流动力学参数。检查后15分钟,使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛程度,根据Aldrete评分(ARS)评估恢复质量,记录检查期间及检查后的并发症以及丙泊酚的追加剂量。
FP组在5分钟和30分钟时的平均动脉压(MAP)(P < 0.05)、15分钟、25分钟和30分钟时的心率(HR)(P < 0.05)以及30分钟时的外周血氧饱和度(SpO₂)(P < 0.05)有统计学意义。FP组在20分钟、25分钟和30分钟时的血氧饱和度下降(P = 0.033)和肌无力(P = 0.004)也有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。根据VAS评估,KP组的疼痛程度较低(P = 0.025)。
在以镇痛为基础的结肠镜检查中,与芬太尼相比,氯胺酮能提供适当的镇痛效果且并发症发生率更低。