• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)知识、治疗经验及吸入装置使用情况的患者调查结果

Results of a Patient Survey Regarding COPD Knowledge, Treatment Experiences, and Practices With Inhalation Devices.

作者信息

Dhand Rajiv, Mahler Donald A, Carlin Brian W, Hanania Nicola A, Ohar Jill A, Pinto-Plata Victor, Shah Tina, Eubanks David, Braman Sidney S

机构信息

University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, Tennessee.

Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire.

出版信息

Respir Care. 2018 Jul;63(7):833-839. doi: 10.4187/respcare.05715. Epub 2018 Mar 20.

DOI:10.4187/respcare.05715
PMID:29559537
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Successful inhalation therapy depends on the ability of patients with COPD to properly use devices. We explored subjects' COPD knowledge, including education they receive from health care providers, treatment experiences, and practices with inhalation devices.

METHODS

A multiple-choice online survey, developed by a steering committee of American Thoracic Society clinicians and scientists, was administered to subjects with COPD who were sourced from the Harris Poll Online panel.

RESULTS

Of the 254 respondents (mean age 61.8 y; 49% males), most subjects (82%) claimed to understand their disease and available treatments, yet COPD symptoms and causes were well known to only 45% and 44% of subjects, respectively. Forty-three percent of subjects had ever used a pressurized metered-dose inhaler or dry-powder inhaler. Of the 54% of subjects who had ever used a small-volume nebulizer (SVN), 63% considered this device to be easy to use, 55% considered it to be fast-acting, 53% considered it to be convenient, and 38% considered it to be essential for treatment. Among subjects who had ever used them, SVNs were preferred by 54% over other devices. One third of subjects desired more extensive education during office visits; 25% felt the time was insufficient to cover questions, and 15% felt their concerns about COPD treatment(s) were ignored. Subjects believed physicians (32%), nurses (26%), and no single provider (28%) were primarily responsible for training and assessing proper inhalation technique.

CONCLUSION

The survey showed differences between patients' beliefs and knowledge of COPD; the need for continuous education from health care providers, particularly on inhalation devices; and extensive use of pressurized metered-dose inhalers and dry-powder inhalers despite positive perceptions of SVNs.

摘要

背景

成功的吸入疗法取决于慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者正确使用设备的能力。我们探讨了受试者对COPD的了解情况,包括他们从医疗保健提供者那里获得的教育、治疗经历以及使用吸入设备的习惯。

方法

由美国胸科学会临床医生和科学家组成的指导委员会开发的多项选择题在线调查,对来自哈里斯在线民意调查小组的COPD受试者进行了调查。

结果

在254名受访者中(平均年龄61.8岁;49%为男性),大多数受试者(82%)声称了解自己的疾病和可用治疗方法,但分别只有45%和44%的受试者清楚COPD的症状和病因。43%的受试者曾使用过压力定量吸入器或干粉吸入器。在曾使用过小容量雾化器(SVN)的54%的受试者中,63%认为该设备易于使用,55%认为其起效快,53%认为其方便,38%认为其对治疗至关重要。在曾使用过这些设备的受试者中,54%的人更喜欢SVN而不是其他设备。三分之一的受试者希望在门诊就诊时能接受更全面的教育;25%的人觉得时间不足以涵盖所有问题,15%的人觉得他们对COPD治疗的担忧被忽视了。受试者认为医生(32%)、护士(26%)以及没有单一的提供者(28%)主要负责培训和评估正确的吸入技术。

结论

调查显示患者对COPD的认知和了解存在差异;需要医疗保健提供者持续进行教育,尤其是关于吸入设备的教育;尽管对SVN有积极的看法,但压力定量吸入器和干粉吸入器仍被广泛使用。

相似文献

1
Results of a Patient Survey Regarding COPD Knowledge, Treatment Experiences, and Practices With Inhalation Devices.一项关于慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)知识、治疗经验及吸入装置使用情况的患者调查结果
Respir Care. 2018 Jul;63(7):833-839. doi: 10.4187/respcare.05715. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
2
Results of a Pulmonologist Survey Regarding Knowledge and Practices With Inhalation Devices for COPD.一项关于慢性阻塞性肺疾病吸入装置知识与实践的肺科医生调查结果
Respir Care. 2018 Jul;63(7):840-848. doi: 10.4187/respcare.05717. Epub 2018 May 1.
3
Inhalatory therapy training: a priority challenge for the physician.吸入疗法培训:医师面临的一项首要挑战。
Acta Biomed. 2007 Dec;78(3):233-45.
4
Maintenance inhaler preference, attribute importance, and satisfaction in prescribing physicians and patients with asthma, COPD, or asthma-COPD overlap syndrome consulting for routine care.维持性吸入器偏好、属性重要性以及哮喘、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)或哮喘-COPD重叠综合征患者及开具处方的医生在接受常规护理咨询时的满意度。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Mar 16;13:927-936. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S154525. eCollection 2018.
5
Factors associated with appropriate inhaler use in patients with COPD - lessons from the REAL survey.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者正确使用吸入器的相关因素——来自真实调查的经验教训
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Feb 26;13:695-702. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S149404. eCollection 2018.
6
COPD: misuse of inhaler devices in clinical practice.COPD:临床实践中吸入器装置的误用。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 May 30;14:1209-1217. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S178040. eCollection 2019.
7
Usage and usability of one dry powder inhaler compared to other inhalers at therapy start: an open, non-interventional observational study in Poland and Germany.与其他吸入器相比,一种干粉吸入器在治疗开始时的使用情况和可用性:在波兰和德国进行的一项开放性、非干预性观察性研究。
Pneumonol Alergol Pol. 2015;83(5):365-77. doi: 10.5603/PiAP.2015.0059.
8
Tiotropium administered by a pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) and spacer produces a similar bronchodilator response as that administered by a Rotahaler in adult subjects with stable moderate-to-severe COPD.对于患有稳定的中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的成年受试者,使用压力定量吸入器(pMDI)和储雾罐给药的噻托溴铵产生的支气管扩张反应与使用旋转式吸入器给药的相似。
Respir Med. 2007 Dec;101(12):2464-71. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2007.07.006. Epub 2007 Aug 24.
9
The use of multiple respiratory inhalers requiring different inhalation techniques has an adverse effect on COPD outcomes.使用需要不同吸入技术的多种呼吸吸入器对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的治疗效果有不利影响。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 Dec 21;12:59-71. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S117196. eCollection 2017.
10
[The choice of inhalation device: A medical act].[吸入装置的选择:一项医疗行为]
Rev Mal Respir. 2015 Jun;32(6):599-607. doi: 10.1016/j.rmr.2014.10.729. Epub 2014 Nov 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacist's knowledge, attitude, and practice toward proper inhaler technique.药剂师对正确吸入器技术的知识、态度和实践。
J Public Health Res. 2025 Aug 22;14(3):22799036251368440. doi: 10.1177/22799036251368440. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of inhalation device use among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吸入装置使用的知识、态度和实践
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 21;15(1):26377. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11852-8.
3
Recalibrating Perceptions and Attitudes Toward Nebulizers versus Inhalers for Maintenance Therapy in COPD: Past as Prologue.
重新校准慢性阻塞性肺疾病维持治疗中雾化器与吸入器的认知和态度:以史为鉴。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2024 Nov 28;19:2571-2586. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S491275. eCollection 2024.
4
The importance of reminders and patient preferences to improve inhaler technique in older adults with COPD.提醒和患者偏好对改善慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)老年患者吸入器技术的重要性。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Jan 4;13:989362. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.989362. eCollection 2022.
5
Treating COPD Patients with Inhaled Medications in the Era of COVID-19 and Beyond: Options and Rationales for Patients at Home.在 COVID-19 时代及以后用吸入药物治疗 COPD 患者:居家患者的选择和理由。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021 Sep 28;16:2687-2695. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S332021. eCollection 2021.
6
Association of Nonmedical Switches in Inhaled Respiratory Medications with Disruptions in Care: A Retrospective Prescription Claims Database Analysis.吸入式呼吸药物中的非医疗转换与护理中断的关联:一项回顾性处方索赔数据库分析。
Pulm Ther. 2021 Jun;7(1):189-201. doi: 10.1007/s41030-021-00147-8. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
7
The Impact of a Forced Non-Medical Switch of Inhaled Respiratory Medication Among Patients with Asthma or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Patient Survey on Experience with Switch, Therapy Satisfaction, and Disease Control.哮喘或慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吸入性呼吸药物强制非医学换药的影响:关于换药体验、治疗满意度和疾病控制的患者调查
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Aug 20;14:1463-1475. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S242215. eCollection 2020.
8
Nebulized Therapies in COPD: Past, Present, and the Future.雾化治疗在 COPD 中的应用:过去、现在和未来。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Jul 12;15:1665-1677. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S252435. eCollection 2020.
9
Inhaler device feature preferences among patients with obstructive lung diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis.阻塞性肺疾病患者对吸入装置特性的偏好:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jun 19;99(25):e20718. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020718.
10
Maintenance Therapy with Nebulizers in Patients with Stable COPD: Need for Reevaluation.稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者雾化器维持治疗:重新评估的必要性。
Pulm Ther. 2020 Dec;6(2):177-192. doi: 10.1007/s41030-020-00120-x. Epub 2020 May 20.